AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

DSOTM - SACD comes of age?

Post Reply
Old 11-04-2003, 2:17 PM   #1
paiger
Guest
Posts: n/a
DSOTM - SACD comes of age?

Just got this home and stuck it on. Seriously blown away. I was starting think that DVD-A had the edge as many of the SACD's I have are badly done but this is fantastic. Maybe it was because it was recorded for quad sound but it works so well and adds several dimensions over the CD.

This is a 'must have' for anyone with a SACD player, especially if you have a good 5.1 set up as well.

I was thinking of giving up on SACD and only buying DVD-A in future but this has changed my mind completely.
  Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 2:39 PM   #2
ronancoll
Guest
Posts: n/a
!

agree completly

The pink floyd masterpiece sound just fantastic. I first got a copy of tubular bells and found the whole thing just a little over produced and the surruond sound stuff sounded just plain odd. But i think the DSOTM disc is just super. The whole sound stage is so open the steering can be so subtle and adds to the whole experience.

anyway i am away to listen to it again.


ps anyboby here studied A-level chemistry in the 80's? I am sure the intro to TIME was used as an intro to chemistry education videos, now that was a surreal experience!
  Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 3:09 PM   #3
Member
 
perrdl's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Worcester
Experience Points:
8,238, Level: 21
Points: 8,238, Level: 21 Points: 8,238, Level: 21 Points: 8,238, Level: 21
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 358
Also agree

Really like it.

The sound stage created is fantastic.

If this is the standard for all up and coming SACD's then I really think it's going to be hard to beat.
  Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 3:44 PM   #4
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Knocksville, Tennessee
Experience Points:
7,859, Level: 21
Points: 7,859, Level: 21 Points: 7,859, Level: 21 Points: 7,859, Level: 21
Activity: 8.0%
Activity: 8.0% Activity: 8.0% Activity: 8.0%
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 37
Posts: 1,745
It's by far the best M/C SACD mix I've heard. I aggree it's partly because of the quad connection. I also think part of it is because of the sounds effects and heavy production. It doesn't sound un-natural to have, say, cash register sounds and the rattle of coinage bouncing around channels. You do the same sort of thing with alot of music and it messes it up IMO.

It seems to me that music full of sound effects like:

Beatles - A DAY IN LIFE
Dukes Of The SRATOSPHEAR (XTC by another name) - 25 O'CLOCK
Pink Floyd - YHE WALL
Spirit - KAHUNA DREAM
Beatles - YELLOW SUBMARINE
Todd Rungren - INTERNATIONAL FEEL

...will be great fodder for 5.1 .
  Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 3:58 PM   #5
Member
 
dunkyboy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Experience Points:
5,461, Level: 17
Points: 5,461, Level: 17 Points: 5,461, Level: 17 Points: 5,461, Level: 17
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 6
Posts: 611
Another great showcase of how 5.1 can benefit music is the Orbital DVD 'The Altogether'. It's only DTS on plain jane DVD-V, but it sounds phenomenal - I can only imagine how it would sound in one of the next-gen formats.

Dunc
  Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 5:29 PM   #6
Prominent Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Experience Points:
9,504, Level: 23
Points: 9,504, Level: 23 Points: 9,504, Level: 23 Points: 9,504, Level: 23
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 20, Got 73
Posts: 3,002
Well -what can i say?
I really didn't think that much of the multichannel version (i have as yet to hear one that totally convinces me).
I still felt it was a bit "fairground" - perhaps i should shift the front/rear balance a bit?
Thought the 2 channel version was by far the best.
My favourite SACD still to date is the Telarc release (NOT SONY!!!) - Carmina Burana, Atlanta orchestra - 2 channel only. Fantastic dynamics.

Steve.
  Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 8:50 PM   #7
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lichfield
Experience Points:
5,127, Level: 16
Points: 5,127, Level: 16 Points: 5,127, Level: 16 Points: 5,127, Level: 16
Activity: 0.3%
Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3%
Thanks: Gave 21, Got 125
Posts: 939
I think it’s a bit harsh to compare the SACD multichannel mix of Dark Side to that of Tubular Bells. The Dark Side mix was specifically done for 5.1 whereas the Tubular Bells was merely the 1976 Quad Mix dusted down from the archives. This mix was done as a rough and ready demo and the mixer was amazed that Oldfield let it through on the nod.

A “proper” mix of Tubular Bells would be a lot different. In fact we’ll soon know as Oldfields 30th anniversary re-recording is coming out on DVDA, mixed into 5.1.

Furthermore Dark Side wasn’t recorded in Quad, and whilst this release is a coup for Sony and for SACD, I don’t think it really says anything about SACD per sec. I’d wager that the mix would sound identical on DVDA.

Fortunately I have a Pioneer 656 so the format is irrelevant.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off