Quote:
Originally Posted by insomniak123 The Klaxons?! Really?! If this is what new music in this country is about then I'll quite happily shoot myself in the head  than listen to any music ever again!
I think they're lacking something you need to make a good band - they cannot sing. at all. not even a little bit. every note is off. or play instruments with any real talent. and they're trying so very hard to get it right. is that really what count these days? I had the displeasure of seeing them live at Hyde Park earlier this year (on the BandStand stage - says it all, while bands like the White Stripes and Queens of The Stone Age were playing a real stage, they played on a bandstand surrounded by empty deckchairs  I've heard homeless men in the street with more talent. I'm being serious. Usually I mock bands that are copying others with no hope in hell of making a decent record, and accept that one of two tunes are catchy, but with the Klaxons I really cannot understand what's going on. What makes it worse is they're arrogant knobs too, in an interview on BBC they claim to have made the "most forward thinking record" - yet they wear stuff that adam ant would've been ashamed of and sound like cindy lauper after a heroin binge. very forward thinking
Anyone care to enlighten me on the one thing that I'm so obviously missing? |
Just watched the recording. I completely agree. In my eyes, they
might have pulled it off if they where a little more endearing (like the Scissor Sisters were until they became annoying). But the fact is they are just sneering and pretentious art students.
They are possibly one those bands that are not really great, but they are so confident and convinced they are the best thing ever, they manage to transfer that onto their fans - and we all know only a minority of people buy music based on musical ability.
They do have something about them though, you cant deny that, i can see why that would have a bit of a following (especially in the student scene), but they wont be around for long IMO. They are good, just not great - there was about 4 acts more deserving of the Mercury award (which dont forget once went to M People instead of Blur's Park Life, lol).
The whole "Nu Rave" thing is very odd anyway, as someone who experienced the real rave scene in all its glory in the late 80's and 90's, i can't see any connection or genuine references/influences at all.