Sorry Kenny, I have bought (and sold off again) about five now. I find them thin, over bright, and what the original vinyl lacked (although I'm not sure what you mean here, as I played the SACD and vinyl versions of Blood on the tracks back to back and there was one winner - the LP hands down) in detail they make up for in 'musicality'. Blonde on Blonde on SACD is a disaster! I'm not the only one to have said that either, as I've seen consumer reviews which reflected that. One guy described it as the worst version he'd heard!
The problem is, for very bit of extra information on the re-master, the modern mastering techniques ruins by producing an un-listenable to overall sound. See the excellent article on this posted on another thread.
Oh I quite agree that some MFLS versions can be bettered. I have some Half speed masters by CBS and others that are better than the MFSL version. I agree there is no carte blanche. I have just been disappointed (as, on other dedicated music forums, have a lot of other people) thus far with many digital re-masters.
However, and before this turns into an un-necessary row

, it is all down to personal taste, and equipment, anyway.
I have heard the argument that Japanese pressings can be better than MFSL versions and yet, other people have rubbished that view. Some of the ding dongs about this on other music forums are great entertainment!
Frankly I really don't care enough to argue the toss either way. If I find a version I like I keep it, if not it goes. Hence I have recently flogged off a load of hi-res and CD re-masters. Along with some poor quality vinyl and ordinary CD's............