Quote:
Originally Posted by AML Video wise they tend to be the same transfers so you wont see any difference there ... |
This is not correct. Many BD movies are MPEG-2 encoded (used for SD DVD as well). Some AVC. Only Warner encodes their BD releases with VC-1 if I'm not mistaken; this is certainly the case with their more recent releases.
Most HD DVD films are encoded with VC-1 and some with AVC.
Now as to the arguments about which encode format is best. For that I suggest that you do your own research on the insider thread on AVS
In brief however, MPEG-2 is an older format, compared to VC-1 and AVC which are new, more "intelligent" and better at compression; therefore the smaller size of VC-1 encoded films with resulting PQ being equal or better when compared to similar efforts made with MPEG-2.
Aside from compression rates and resulting file sizes the different encode formats are also different in that at which they're good - see details on the AVS thread that I mentioned - with many people preferring VC-1. AVC can hold its own in a few areas, and MPEG-2 can produce excellent results as well (see Casino Royale) but takes up a lot more disc space in doing so.
Here's the AVS insider thread for research purposes if you're interested:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=774635