AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

is it ever sacricing pic quality for better sound quality

Post Reply
Old 15-11-2002, 11:58 AM   #1
7 of 9
Guest
Posts: n/a
is it ever sacricing pic quality for better sound quality

does any one one on here think it is ever worth sacrificing picture quality for better sound, e.g. face/off dts horrible picture but great sound.

i myself i don't think this is ever worth it, i would rather have a package with both good picture and sound e.g. face/off dolby digital.
  Quote
Old 15-11-2002, 12:27 PM   #2
Member
 
dfield2000's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cardiff
Experience Points:
6,149, Level: 18
Points: 6,149, Level: 18 Points: 6,149, Level: 18 Points: 6,149, Level: 18
Activity: 1.4%
Activity: 1.4% Activity: 1.4% Activity: 1.4%
Thanks: Gave 3, Got 5
Posts: 965
I'm more into the sound advantages of DVD rather that the picture.

I've always thought that picture quality from normal tv broadcasts was OK for my humble eyes, but I love tweaking my amp/speakers/etc to get the best possible sound from a good dts encoded film.
  Quote
Old 15-11-2002, 2:30 PM   #3
Ex Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Belfast
Experience Points:
19,712, Level: 34
Points: 19,712, Level: 34 Points: 19,712, Level: 34 Points: 19,712, Level: 34
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 6,067
I dont think that either should be sacrificed....... my view is that extras should be sacrificed and the film itself made as good as posssible.

ad
  Quote
Old 15-11-2002, 4:13 PM   #4
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere on t'internet
Experience Points:
4,682, Level: 16
Points: 4,682, Level: 16 Points: 4,682, Level: 16 Points: 4,682, Level: 16
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 3, Got 2
Posts: 309
I am getting behind buns on this one!

I think the max amount of space should be handed over to the picture & sound.... extras are what 2 disc sets etc are for in my opinion!
  Quote
Old 15-11-2002, 4:20 PM   #5
js
Guest
Posts: n/a
I agree with Kirk and buns.
DVD is all about pic and sound quality. Extras in my opinion are just a bonus - interesting initially but I rarely watch them again and as Kirk said a second disc can be provided for the extras.
  Quote
Old 15-11-2002, 4:23 PM   #6
Member
 
perrdl's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Worcester
Experience Points:
8,238, Level: 21
Points: 8,238, Level: 21 Points: 8,238, Level: 21 Points: 8,238, Level: 21
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 358
Could not agree more, I very rarely watch any extra's, and if I do it's only the once!
  Quote
Old 15-11-2002, 7:45 PM   #7
LDR LDR is offline
Senior Member
 
LDR's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wales
Experience Points:
6,526, Level: 19
Points: 6,526, Level: 19 Points: 6,526, Level: 19 Points: 6,526, Level: 19
Activity: 3.0%
Activity: 3.0% Activity: 3.0% Activity: 3.0%
Thanks: Gave 46, Got 43
Posts: 1,615
I also concur..
  Quote
Old 15-11-2002, 9:26 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Taz69's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bristol
Experience Points:
7,762, Level: 21
Points: 7,762, Level: 21 Points: 7,762, Level: 21 Points: 7,762, Level: 21
Activity: 0.3%
Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3%
Thanks: Gave 47, Got 34
Posts: 1,927
I agree with Kirk, Buns etc, with DVD9's it is possible to have the best bitrate for picture, DTS/DD5.1 and all the extras, why make a dvd9 utilising just about 2/3rds (sometimes less) of the space available and produce a poor picture, if we wanted that we would have stayed with VHS (lol).

IMHO

Taz69
  Quote
Old 15-11-2002, 11:48 PM   #9
Ex Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Belfast
Experience Points:
19,712, Level: 34
Points: 19,712, Level: 34 Points: 19,712, Level: 34 Points: 19,712, Level: 34
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 6,067
not often i have a queue behind me!

I do believe this point has been debated in one form or another in the past...... there are still many people who are very keen on extras. Unfortunately the simple truth is that an extra packed disc comes across better to the general public than a bare bones quality transfer.

ad
  Quote
Old 16-11-2002, 12:59 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
bowenjones's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wales
Experience Points:
11,198, Level: 25
Points: 11,198, Level: 25 Points: 11,198, Level: 25 Points: 11,198, Level: 25
Activity: 0.3%
Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3%
Thanks: Gave 261, Got 427
Posts: 2,718
I think that on music dvd's most of the room available
on the disc should be taken up by the soundtrack preferably
a high bitrate dts one.
After watching the videos or a live concert I usually leave
the telly off when I play the discs again and just listen to
the music.
A good example of soundtrack over video is Queen's
Greatest Video Hits Vol. 1.
I don't think I'll ever watch those horrid vids again!!!
  Quote
Old 16-11-2002, 2:36 AM   #11
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have to admit, i am a big believer in the audio side of things....

Get the right combination & the results are utterly brilliant.

Hate to be without my audio.


Adzman.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off