 |
|
|
06-05-2005, 12:06 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 858
Thanks: Gave 31, Got 61
|
Kingdom of Heaven
Going to see this tonight!
I really hope i'm not let down as i have been with Troy, Alexander and King Arthur. The trailer looks fantastic and i'm sure Ridley can't mess it up, just hope Orlando is up to the job, i don't think he has the same screen presence as Russel Crowe. We'll see.....
Anyone else looking forward to it (or seen it!?)
What has the critical reaction been like?
Rob
|
|
|
|
06-05-2005, 12:22 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,999
Thanks: Gave 206, Got 124
|
Metro gave to 2 stars this morning and empire gave it 3. i've been looking forward to this for ages, the only problem is that its going to be held up against Gladiator which is both envitable and unfair. my understanding is that it looks very nice but you dont really care what happens
you pays your money and makes ya choice!
fingers crossed!!!
Gary
__________________
GT: Captain Splash
Kit List: a screen, some black boxes, some silver boxes, some cables, some speakers. Techno willy waving isn't my thing.
|
|
|
|
06-05-2005, 11:24 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 16
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
|
 i saw it friday morning at my local ugc. i thought it was a good film with a decent enough story. it ended sooner than i thought it was going to (i had it in my head it lasted for 3 hours) i like scotts films and like most of the epics lateley yes including troy and king arthur
|
|
|
|
07-05-2005, 9:51 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Posts: 21,406
Thanks: Gave 364, Got 900
|
I'm a big fan of Ridley Scott. I think it is inevitable there will be comparisons made to Gladiator, I just hope there is enough to distinguish itself from it.
Rob, what were your thoughts?
|
|
|
|
07-05-2005, 11:51 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Cotswolds
Posts: 393
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 15
|
Saw the film yesterday.
Good but not brilliant, but a good Sir Ridley film is better than most.
I got the feeling he didn't want to offend anyones religious believes.
Solid performances from Olanado Bloom, Liam Neeson, Jermy Irons, Edward Norton and Ghassan Massoud.
As usual, beautifully shot, action sequences are stunning but I feel there is a better film in there somewhere. There are rumours that Sir Ridleys' first cut of the film was 40-50 mins longer. Me thinks this will appear as a directors cut on dvd.
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 8:25 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 858
Thanks: Gave 31, Got 61
|
OK, saw it Friday as planned and i'm sad to say overall i was dissapointed. I did have high expectations of the film, and by no means was it a bad film. Probably better than Troy and definitely better than Alexander. The acting was fine, i felt Bloom did a good job, Neeson was excellent. And the battle scenes were awesome, couldnt fault them.
There was just no real emotion in the story, the 'bad guys' were actually quite nice, and the good guys were actually quite bad! In the end you didnt really care who won or lost, thats the trouble, you felt no attachment to the charachters as i did with Maximus in Gladiator or William Wallace in Braveheart. This is not Blooms fault, but the fault of the script writer as has been mentioned i dont think they wanted to offend anyone!
What you need is a real villain and a real hero and this didnt have either, maybe they should not stick too close to historical 'fact'/political correctness and be a bit more creative.
it is worth seeing (even just for the battle scenes), but don't expect too much.
6/10
Cheers Rob
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 12:50 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Posts: 21,406
Thanks: Gave 364, Got 900
|
I'll wait for the dvd release on this one methinks!
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 1:16 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 858
Thanks: Gave 31, Got 61
|
Also my experience wasn't helped, by having to go and complain about the picture going in and out of focus every 10 seconds or so. I can't believe the rest of the audience were willing to sit through the whole film like it!  luckily it was fixed as soon as i complained!
Rob
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 1:39 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Notts/Sth. Yorks border
Posts: 2,113
Thanks: Gave 162, Got 32
|
I'm guilty of comparing this to Gladiator. historical epic, directed by Ridley Scott, whose gonna blame me?
And I didn't think that it was as good, as has already been stated you just don't give enough of a damn about most of the characters. Also I thought Orlando Bloom was too young for the role, perhaps young is the wrong word, maybe gravitas or precence would be a better choice, perhaps even inexperience. This does not mean that he's bad in this role but just the wrong shape for the part. If that makes any sense.
__________________
... but Affleck was the bomb in "Phantoms".
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 2:00 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: Gave 11, Got 18
|
Saw this yesterday and was disappointed  I had high hopes for it and although it started off well I think as others have said you just don't care enough about the characters. Their parts are too shallow, also I think Orlando is still just a boy and definitely not a man. Somebody like Eric Banna (not sure of spelling) would have been much better, somebody whos a bit haggard and chiseled. Battle scenes were good in places but some of the filming style was a little frenetic for me and I didn't think that you could really make out what was going on some of the time.
__________________
Barco G808s, Lumagen HDP(ISF), Oppo970HD, Toshiba EP35, Tag AV32RDP, 4 ATC T16s, ATC C4CA, SVS PB12.2plus2, xbox360, 7" TFT monitor. MarkGrant cables. Toshiba Regza, Teac DRL700, Philips MT2400 HTPC, Mission FS2AV, 2 KEF 2005.2
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 2:07 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 858
Thanks: Gave 31, Got 61
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thunder
Their parts are too shallow, also I think Orlando is still just a boy and definitely not a man. Somebody like Eric Banna (not sure of spelling) would have been much better, somebody whos a bit haggard and chiseled.
|
Yeah, Bana would've been good, he was the best thing about Troy!  However i dont think it would have made much difference given the script. It just needs a complete overhaul to make you care about what happens! in need of some good old fashioned Heroes and pantomime villains!
So when will we get to see another decent epic? IMO Gladiator was the last (not including LOTR) and has been nothing close since. Anything on the horizon? i remember reading about Terrence Maliks retelling of the Pocahontas story (forget the name) with Colin Farrell (although i think they've made Pocahontas a bit older! :lol  that could be good.....
Rob
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 3:38 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Leeds
Posts: 180
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
|
Haven't seen it yet but do want to, but have heard that Scott had to cut over an hour from the film, which might have added to the story
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 8:58 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hants
Posts: 6,576
Thanks: Gave 135, Got 253
|
don't want to spoil it, so will say that I thought it was excellent, I was hoping that it wouldn't be all action, there is some historical accuracy there, not a lot, but enough to give people the jist of the time period. Fantastic cinematography, quite similar to gladiator in that way, i'd give it a 7.5/10.
__________________
Only when the last tree has died and the last river been poisoned and the last fish been caught will we realise we cannot eat money.
http://www.no2id.net/ - Say no to the police state.
|
|
|
|
10-05-2005, 11:57 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 386
Thanks: Gave 3, Got 2
|
R1 Release is October 14. 
|
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 5:35 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 3,885
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 5
|
Saw this last night and have to agree completely with what everyone else has said... wanted it to be better than it was, but at the same time it wasn't a bad film. I thought Bloom was definitely a little lacking, he is a strong actor, but he doesn't chew up the scenery like a Russel Crowe... Sir Ridley sure can make a film look good though, I thought that this was one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen - the cgi city of Jerusalem was outstanding, as were the battle scenes. and I love the way Ridley fills every shot with such texture: there is always, snow, or dust particles, or fire, or smoke or something dancing on the light.
Best thing about the movie though was the score - just ordered the CD 
__________________
Opinions expressed here by me are not necessarily those of AV Forums or associated websites.
DVDs R' Us
|
|
|
|
| |