Member Log In

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Dedicated THX Home Theatre

Post Reply
Old 23-07-2012, 9:21 AM   #31
Senior Member
Philw101's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Windsor
Thanks: Gave 138, Got 114
Posts: 1,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by magicvinny View Post
philw101 thanks!

How do you find your pre-amp?

It is the one I'm looking for

He would fit perfect with the Onkyo PA MC5500.
Hi there magicvinny - Your welcome buddy!

Yes the pre-amp is fantastic thank you, I have to be honest very similar to the Onkyo TX-NR3008 I used to have, I guess because they have the same processing abilities/specs. (I was only using the 3008 as a pre/pro since I had the Arcam P7 Power amp - also great value for a THX Ultra 2 product!). I do find the video processing features on the Onkyo range to be excellent especially the ability to calibrate each source connected to specific standards (whether ISF or THX picture quality). Overall I highly recommend the Onkyo's as a processor - I don't think you can get better without having to spend a least three times as much (Arcam AV888 or maybe the Classe SSP800 or Anthem).

I have not heard the Onkyo 5500 power amp though and cannot comment on its performance (although reviews online suggest it's pretty good). I guess on a personal note - I do find it frustrating with the japanese manufactuers when they quote wattage with only one channel driven and state that as the load per channel. 200watt per channel with one channel driven at 1Khz is not the same as 200watt per channel 1Hz to 20Khz with all 7 seven channels (like my Arcam). Anyhow! Sorry gripe over! :D

In short mate - I dont think you can go wrong with the Onkyos - they do exactly what they say on the tin - power and control with movies with all the added bonuses of a feature list longer than your arm!
  Quote
Advert
Log in or sign up to remove
Old 25-07-2012, 8:28 AM   #32
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Hey Philw101,


Thank you for your reply!

I'm looking for a onkyo pre-amp but I'm hesitating. I can buy a PR-sc5507 or a TX-NR3009 that I can use as pre-amp, for about the same price. The 5507 is a little bit cheaper.

Can you comment on the quality of those 2?

I guess the 3009 has newer tech inside but the power consumption is 1000Watt and the 5507 is 100watt.
Don't care about the video processing as I will be using the Oppo 93 wich has 2 HDMI outputs(just like the 95 ), 1 for video only wich will go straight to the projector.
  Quote
Old 25-07-2012, 9:28 AM   #33
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
And the other wall:




  Quote
Old 25-07-2012, 10:23 AM   #34
Senior Member
Philw101's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Windsor
Thanks: Gave 138, Got 114
Posts: 1,193
Hey MagicVinny

Ok firstly lets consider the 3009 (firstly I am guessing you know its a receiver and not just a pre amp?) - Will you be using a power amp along side this (using the pre-outs on the 3009) or just the AVR as it is? I think the only real difference with the 3009 compared to the previous series 3008/5008 will be the addition of the 4K upscaling and upgraded network features but since you won't be using the video options and placing the video straight to the screen you don't need to worry about that. So maybe an older AVR could be worthwhile - I used to have the 3008 before upgrading to the 5508, while it sounded great with my B&W 600 series - it didn't have enough power to drive the 800 series.

Now talking about the 5507 - yes it is a great processor, however will you be wanting any Room EQ ? I only ask since the 5507 only has the Audyessy XT eq, and not the XT32 (higher resolution filters applied to signal), to allow for increased detailed equalisation. There are a couple of people on here than have upgraded their AVRs and Pre/pros for such technology - one chap is called i_raz - it may be worth asking him how he has found the upgrade. A great compromise to this would either be going for the 5508 if you could, or maybe another brand (unless you wanted to stick with Onkyo?).

Of course for my personal reasons as to the change from the AVR 3008 to the Pre/Pro 5508 - was not enough power from the Onkyo amps for my speaker setup, and too much power consumption from using both the AVR and Power amp together- since you cannot turn off the amps in the AVR while using the pre outs it was still consuming 1000watts + while just processing. I think overall I was using nearly 2.6Kw for just the sound which is way too much for my apartment (had trouble with fuses blowing).

Any how buddy - I hope that helps! If you need any more advice on the Onkyos give me a shout. I do think you would be best going down the seperates route - that way if you do need to upgrade the processing in future (this will be outdated before your power amp), you can do so more easily than if you were going down the AVR route.

Cheers

Phil.

Last edited by Philw101; 25-07-2012 at 10:28 AM.
  Quote
Old 25-07-2012, 10:31 AM   #35
Senior Member
Philw101's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Windsor
Thanks: Gave 138, Got 114
Posts: 1,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevos View Post
What bugs me (ok small things for small minds) is why they put stupid light displays on high end AV kit, although i am assuming it can be disabled.

That blue light may look cool in the pictures but lets face it, no one is going to have it enabled, since you want dark for a AV setup. So either its the light will have to be turned off or the amp placed in a cupboard, which has the same effect.
I think the blue light is so you can tell the unit is on. European safety regulations state this must be on all objects that consume electricity, other wise someone could get a nasty shock if they open it up and not realise its on.

I agree though it is bloody distracting. I turn the blue light off my Pre amp!
  Quote
Old 25-07-2012, 12:16 PM   #36
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Thanks: Gave 30, Got 24
Posts: 434
magicvinny, are those sound insulation panels in your pictures above?
  Quote
Old 25-07-2012, 12:26 PM   #37
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by simonprr View Post
magicvinny, are those sound insulation panels in your pictures above?
Yes they are, it's the Isofix sound insulation.
  Quote
Old 25-07-2012, 2:00 PM   #38
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Thanks: Gave 30, Got 24
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by magicvinny View Post
Yes they are, it's the Isofix sound insulation.
Cool, thanks! Would be interested to know how well it works in a real life situation The graph on that PDF makes it look like it's quite good even at bass levels...
  Quote
Old 28-07-2012, 9:20 PM   #39
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Ceiling is done.

Will post pic later.
  Quote
Old 29-07-2012, 12:01 AM   #40
Senior Member
Philw101's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Windsor
Thanks: Gave 138, Got 114
Posts: 1,193
You thought any more about the Pre/Pro?
  Quote
Old 29-07-2012, 8:00 AM   #41
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Hi Philw101,

Yes I did. Actually I don't think of nothing else anymore than that Home theatre

I will use a pre/pro configuration anyway as I already bought the PA-SC5500.

I know the Onkyo 3009 is a Receiver that I can use as a pre-amp and it has the Audyssey XT32. The PR-SC5507 has Audyssey XT so to correct the room acoustic problems so I would be better off with the newer XT32 but then ofcourse I will have to look for a PR-SC5508 wich is not so easy to find or go with the 3009 that is cheaper but power consumption is higher.

I could go for another brand but I want to stick with the Onkyo for the uniformity of the system.

Integra would still be ok as it is build on the same chassis than Onkyo but with better quality components, but it's even harder to find.

Choices are not easy

Last edited by magicvinny; 29-07-2012 at 8:07 AM.
  Quote
Old 29-07-2012, 11:03 AM   #42
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Here it is:

  Quote
Old 30-07-2012, 11:10 AM   #43
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: hatfield
Thanks: Gave 22, Got 15
Posts: 321
dedicated thx home theatre

magicvinny,
hi, i have been following your thread with intrest and for what its worth can offer this small piece of advice. i have a 9.1 miller & kreisel setup with s150's and ss150's all round and was running them with an onkyo txnr3008. the amp kept turning itself of when i turned it up to say -45/50 db and got very hot , it cannot run a large speaker setup at volume. i paired it up with an onkyo 5500 power amp with the 5500 running the front left/centre and right and also the surrounds left/right, then the 3008 does the rear surrounds and the upper fronts plus all the processing. this combo now works great and i can have the volume at the thx reference level with no problems at all ( not very often,it is very loud) although the 3008 has now been discontinued it has all the audessy xt32 so no need to change the amp. i personally think the reciever/power amp combo is better than the pre/power amp setup as you have more output and less strain on the amps.
regards
john
  Quote
Old 30-07-2012, 1:00 PM   #44
Senior Member
aandpwoodley's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oxford
Thanks: Gave 323, Got 431
Posts: 2,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by magicvinny View Post
Here it is:

image
It's looking like it will be a great space, jealious
  Quote
Thanks from:
magicvinny (30-07-2012)
Old 30-07-2012, 7:43 PM   #45
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by john01707 View Post
magicvinny,
hi, i have been following your thread with intrest and for what its worth can offer this small piece of advice. i have a 9.1 miller & kreisel setup with s150's and ss150's all round and was running them with an onkyo txnr3008. the amp kept turning itself of when i turned it up to say -45/50 db and got very hot , it cannot run a large speaker setup at volume. i paired it up with an onkyo 5500 power amp with the 5500 running the front left/centre and right and also the surrounds left/right, then the 3008 does the rear surrounds and the upper fronts plus all the processing. this combo now works great and i can have the volume at the thx reference level with no problems at all ( not very often,it is very loud) although the 3008 has now been discontinued it has all the audessy xt32 so no need to change the amp. i personally think the reciever/power amp combo is better than the pre/power amp setup as you have more output and less strain on the amps.
regards
john
John01707, Thanks for the advice.

Just not really sure if the receiver/amp combo is better then the pre/amp combo.

I will be using 7 channels of the PA-SC5500 and not 9 as I will have a 7.2 set up. But even if you would use all 9 channels of the amp there shouldn't be any problems as it is made to use them all 9, I guess

The pre-amp is made to process the audio and the video so I don't see any problems with that and power consumption is less.
  Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 4:11 PM   #46
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: hatfield
Thanks: Gave 22, Got 15
Posts: 321
dedicated thx home theatre

magicvinny,
just trying t save you some money! i stand to be corrected but i think the 3008/3009 have the same processing capabilities as the pre amp apart from 4k so you already have your pre amp. as for the 5500 power amp which i own myself and like,it is capable of running 9 channels but only has 1 channel driven so the more channels you hook up the less watts per channel are available. so in theory if your like me and have it up loud you could still take the amp into uncomfortable territory. plus you have some very nice speakers there that will need driving properly. thats why i like the avr/power combo as there is more output available.i am no expert but was asking all the same questions as you are and i think i came to the best solution after being given what i think was good advice.
i aggree a bit more power consumption but think of all the enjoyment you are getting from all those watts per channel!
regards
john
  Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 4:54 PM   #47
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
And some more progress:



Had to try to put already one speaker in



The "wall":

  Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 4:57 PM   #48
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Here you see the thickness of the wall with the insulation:



This is where the subs will go.
  Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 1:13 PM   #49
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Building the backwall:






Last edited by magicvinny; 09-08-2012 at 12:12 PM.
  Quote
Old 08-08-2012, 3:42 PM   #50
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
The inside backwall is done:



Sound absorbing panels:


Last edited by magicvinny; 09-08-2012 at 12:08 PM.
  Quote
Old 08-08-2012, 4:24 PM   #51
Illustrious Member
Smurfin's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Planning the next project
Thanks: Gave 790, Got 1,225
Posts: 15,564
Looks awesome
  Quote
Old 09-08-2012, 8:23 AM   #52
Member
scatterbug's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Wales
Thanks: Gave 109, Got 119
Posts: 965
I presume you are going to place your equipment in the other part of the attic? Are you going to use the remaining space for anything?

Great build so far.
  Quote
Old 09-08-2012, 11:43 AM   #53
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Can you still see pics?????

I already posted all of them twice.
  Quote
Old 09-08-2012, 11:47 AM   #54
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Hi scatterbug,


The equipment will go in the home theatre, right side of the back wall.

The other half of the place will be used as a wellness-room with lounge, sauna shower etc..That will be for the misses so we each have our thing
  Quote
Thanks from:
scatterbug (09-08-2012)
Old 09-08-2012, 12:33 PM   #55
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
pic problem seems to be ok
  Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 9:22 PM   #56
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Some nice decoration:

  Quote
Old 13-08-2012, 9:25 AM   #57
Member
homethx's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Thanks: Gave 34, Got 76
Posts: 714
Where did you get that sign from please ?
  Quote
Old 13-08-2012, 5:52 PM   #58
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Thanks: Gave 30, Got 24
Posts: 434
Looking good! How big is that room?
  Quote
Old 13-08-2012, 7:04 PM   #59
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by homethx View Post
Where did you get that sign from please ?
I got it from ebay.com
  Quote
Old 13-08-2012, 7:07 PM   #60
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 6
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by simonprr View Post
Looking good! How big is that room?
Thanks but still a long way to go.......

The room is 3.5m on 4.5m.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off