The Official LG LH4000 LCD Thread

[LG Blog]

LH4000 HD Ready 1080p LCD TV series (47-, 42-, 37-, 32-inch)

The LH4000 series offers consumers an exceptional viewing and listening experience with a sleek exterior and unique Invisible Speaker System. With TruMotion 100 Hz technology, motion blur is reduced for a more natural viewing experience at almost any viewing angle.

Key features include:
· HD Ready 1080p
· 3 HDMI™ version.1.3 with Deep Colour
· Intelligent Sensor
· 24p Real Cinema (5:5 Pulldown)
· ISFccc Ready
· LG SimpLink™
· USB 2.0 for access to digital music and photos (JPEG / MP3 Playback)
· Smart Energy Saving
· LG Core Technologies

Photos will be added when we have them. Any thoughts?

You can now find photos in our Flickr set.



H

[Ian Paul]

Last week I got a 42LH4000, nice telly, but the web site and info show that it has a blue bezel, when I got the unit unpacked I found mine had a clear bezel. Spoke to LG who said they would pass it onto technical, still no answer. The TV is fine, but why should I get a TV that is not what is being shown on the their web site?
Keep speaking to LG but still no answers.
Spoke to the supplier who has unpacked several more TV's and there the same.
Trying to get an answer out of LG is proving very hard.
Was going to order a LG Blue Ray player, but I think LG will only supply me a 'Ray' player, as they don't do colours.
Will let you know if I get any news. But don't hold you breath.

Ian

[Hyperboy]

the one i've seen was pretty much a clear bezel, VERY slight hint of blue perhaps but the website images are very misleading....

apart from that, seemed like a fantastic value for money TV!!...

[Ian Paul]

The problem was when I spoke to LG they didn't know what the problem was and have only just come back to me to say that the bezel is nothing like there advertising photos.
TV is very good, but LG should change what they are advertising.
Ian

[Ian Paul]

Does anybody know a code that would work for this TV, for the Sky handset, LG say they don't have one yet, and the Sky web site don't show one.
Ian

[Tommas]

Well atm im looking for a new tv and have been lookin for a nice design telly. The choice is btw either LG or Samsung. The LG seems alot cooler and what im worried about next is the prices.

The price range for the LH4000 to LH5000 is pretty deep when you look at what u get. The LH5000 got usb that supports Divx HD, a 200Hz True motion and Energy Saving Recommended.

Thats about it. Ive seen some post that the diffrence btw 100Hz and 200Hz is nothing and many turns off the true motion as it dont realy work great.

So my question will be, is it worth goin up to the LH5000? and is this telly worth the money compared to the Samsung LE40A786

[manchy69]

is 42lh4000 judder free?

[Ian Paul]

I've just got a 42LH4000, paid £699. The picture is very good, I didn't go for the 5000, couldn't see the point in paying out the extra cash. Have set the TV to 100Hz and seems to run fine, can't comment on the Samsung. But you get a lot of telly for your money with the LH4000. Ian

[manchy69]

Originally Posted by Ian Paul

I've just got a 42LH4000, paid £699. The picture is very good, I didn't go for the 5000, couldn't see the point in paying out the extra cash. Have set the TV to 100Hz and seems to run fine, can't comment on the Samsung. But you get a lot of telly for your money with the LH4000. Ian

is 42lh4000 judder free on 1080p/24 video signal?

[Daniel_C]

Hi,

Does anyone know if the 32" version of the LH4000 has 100Hz or not? It used say it did on the LG website but that's now changed. The same with the richer sounds website, although when I looked in there it had a 100 Hz sticker on it.

It seems that the only difference between the LH4000 and 5000 is a slightly different design and the ability of the LH5000 to play video files from USB - neither of those seem to be worth the extra cost but if the the 5000 does 100Hz and the 4000 doesn't that might tip the ballance for me. Can anyone who has some experience with these models let me now?

Thanks a lot for your time

Dan

[Ian Paul]

Hi Dan, I've got a LH4000, it is 100Hz and full HD, 1080. Had it about 3 weeks, good TV.
Ian

[Daniel_C]

Cheers for that Ian.

I've just checked the LG site and it says the 42 inch has 100Hz but it no longer says that for the 32. Just checked the trustedreviews review on the 32" and it says it doesn't have it. But I remember the specs used to have it. I wonder if they removed it or LG just aren't bigging it up so people buy the LH5000 model.

Anyone got the 32" for a definitive answer?

Cheers,

Dan

[Glen6899]

I'm also planning to get a TV from this series pretty soon, probably the 42" but maybe even the 47" if I'm feeling adventurous.

However I've recently read a review which was hardly overwhelmingly positive.

While the first part of the review is very positive, they then raise a couple of quite concerning issues, and indeed the final rating is fairly mediocre.

It's not enough to put me off, and at the end of the day it's the opinion of someone who probably has far higher expectations than the average consumer such as myself, but maybe if someone who owns the TV could give their view on the points they've raised?

Basically there seems to be concern that:-

• Dark scenes are mired by a blue-grey mist
• Contrast drops dramatically if viewed from an angle
• Sound sync problems while watching 1080p/24 Blu-ray sources via HDMI

What do LH4000 owners make of these suggestions?

Thanks in advance to anyone who can give any input.

[Barchetta]

Well, I'm coming toward the end of a two trial with the 32LH4000 (thank you Richer Sounds!) and I must say the TV has surprised in a number of ways.

This is my first stab at HDTV after sitting on the fence for years so I'm a bit lacking when it comes to comparing with other sets/manufacturers.

First off though - the 32"LH4000 DOES NOT have 100hz (even the guys at R.S. have had to alter their in store displays following confirmation from the LG rep). The 37" does have this facility.

Must say from a motion-wise perspective the set is much better than many 50hz models (and some 100hz too). It can struggle with some fast action though I'm not entirely sure that wasn't coming from the source material.
The 5ms response time (so I'm told) may be helping out here.

Calibration-wise it is STACKED with options - again I've not seen many other sets and certainly haven't got my hands dirty like I have with this set - so I have found a much more satisfactory picture once I got the set home.

SD DTV is better than I'd expected though as many have said Freeview is a mixed bag when it comes to transmission quality - hardly the fault of the set.

My main uses are gaming and TV - no blue-ray or SKY-HD yet but the component 1080p images from the 360 look fantastic and have really revived my interest (and have had me digging out some old games to see them in a new light!). Response time seems ample to me but I'm no gaming ninja....

I purchased a VGA cable for the 360 too so I could check out the upscaling to 1080p of a DVD - it works fine and the set can indeed accept and show a 1080p signal (some don't of VGA apparently). I'm not convinced the upscaling is of much benefit over the component signal though the set does report the signal at 60hz as opposed to 50hz via component.

Last night I spent some time with a borrowed Digital Video Essentials disc as I attempted a more serious calibration task which bring me to the only real issue I have with the set. Black Levels.

With the disc I have found that the 'blacker than black' ability of the set is simply not possible. There is no 'lower than the background' black visible on the test pages no matter what backlight/brightness/contrast settings I try.

Since many of my DVDs contain dark scenes (Blade Runner being something of a favourite) I have been disappointed with the black on this set. I know plasma is still the best way to go but 32" was my maximum and I wasn't so taken with the only 32" plasma - LGs 32PG6000 when I saw both that set and this 32LH4000 side by side in store.

Also, unless you are sat pretty much dead on and with the set at eye level, the picture clarity drops off enormously. Please don't consider mounting this up high on a wall (wrong headed whatever the set I know but...).

It really has me wondering in the few remaining days of my trial whether I should be looking at an alternative set (Panny TX32LZD80 anyone?) or live with the 85% grey level of the blacks on the set.....

[fruitfly]

Originally Posted by Barchetta

Last night I spent some time with a borrowed Digital Video Essentials disc as I attempted a more serious calibration task which bring me to the only real issue I have with the set. Black Levels.

With the disc I have found that the 'blacker than black' ability of the set is simply not possible. There is no 'lower than the background' black visible on the test pages no matter what backlight/brightness/contrast settings I try.

Thanks for the review, very informative, although there may be an issue with black levels that may not be the TV's fault.
What device did you use to play the DVE disc? This maybe a big factor in your results as not all players are equal and some are unable to pass through all information required for the disc to display properly - the below black test being the one to trip up many systems.
It's true that you do not need to see all three black bars to calibrate a set, but it is certainly useful, as the below black bar gives you that extra bit of information. Not seeing the below black bar doesn't always mean you lose all detail in a picture, and like I say, it may not be down to the tv.
For example, using an LG7000, a PS3 and the the DVE Blu-ray, the TV shows all information and the three black bars are clearly visible for adjustment. On the other hand, calibrating the same TV using a Pioneer DVD player and a DVE DVD, the below black bar is not visibible during testing. I would then be inclined to blame my DVD player for clipping the detail and not the TV as I already know it's a capable performer that is able to display below black.
All components are linked by the same brand of HDMI and I've noticed that you are using component cables. Once again this could be a factor in reducing the amount of information reaching the TV.
The use of different eqiupment might yield different results.