AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

LED BLU vs CCFL

Post Reply
Old 26-11-2008, 1:45 PM   #1
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Experience Points:
2,291, Level: 11
Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 1
Posts: 14
LED BLU vs CCFL

I understand that LED BLU is (potentialy) better than CCFL. Mainly due to the yield of higher contrast ratios (I'm trying to fight the big numbers!) and potentially plasma-esque blacks. In SONYs 'guff' it states that their RGB implementation makes 'your blacks darker than the night sky' . . . hmm

I just wanted to scout peoples experienced opinions on if this:

1) Is it really as good as made out (ie LED BLU is better than CCFL)?
2) Is this something that should be a key consideration in purchasing a new set? (I can't see it in the ]FAQ, so maybe not?)
3) How does the the RGB LED BLU implementation fair against the the white implementation? (in terms of overall picture quality)
4) I am resultantly looking firmly in the direction of the [SIZE=1]Samsung LE46A956D1M. Which I have seen for 1454.70. This is pushing my budget of ~1200, but I don't mind if it is really worth it! Any other potential contenders (>=46")?

Background - I am upgrading from a >10 year old CRT - solid performer, mind; good old Trinitron!

The main uses of the new set (no particular order) will be gaming, SD TV <edit>including sport</edit> (maybe HD later down the line), DVD and a some Blu Ray. The extra features on the Samsung (DLNA - videos from computer / USB) would probably be put to good use too.

Last edited by RottenFox; 27-11-2008 at 3:27 PM. Reason: removed pointless size 1 tags...
  Quote
Old 26-11-2008, 3:54 PM   #2
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Experience Points:
6,144, Level: 18
Points: 6,144, Level: 18 Points: 6,144, Level: 18 Points: 6,144, Level: 18
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 95, Got 55
Posts: 313
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

I think it's still a bit early to get an awful lot of forum opinion yet...there only seems to be a couple of Sammy 9 series and Phillips 9803 owners out there at the mo. I don't think the Sony 4500 has actually hit the shops yet (although I believe it's imminent), so nobody can really tell if the RGB LED variety of backlight will offer anything over regular white LEDs.

The general feedback from the review websites seems to be very good though try reading these:


Samsung LE55A956 Review

Samsung LE55A956 55in LCD TV Review - TV Reviews - TrustedReviews

Philips 42PFL9803H 42in LED LCD TV Review - TV Reviews - TrustedReviews

For me personally, I've ruled out the Sony on the basis that it's physical size is too big for my lounge. I'm currently swayed towards the Sammy 9 series because I'm not convinced that the 2k phillips will be worth the extra 500quid.

Last edited by DaveC; 26-11-2008 at 3:58 PM.
  Quote
Thanks from:
weblah (26-11-2008)
Old 26-11-2008, 4:27 PM   #3
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Experience Points:
2,291, Level: 11
Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 1
Posts: 14
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

I didn't realise that the LED BLUs were so new - I thought that these were the 2nd gens. Guess I was wrong

I am pretty certain I like the sounds of the Samsung too - I guess I should go and have a good play, when I can, before I commit!
As an aside - I had seen a couple of those reviews before, but failed to understand the greyscale and colour charts on them (under the "Calibration" section). Anyone know of a link where they are explained simply?

Last edited by RottenFox; 27-11-2008 at 3:28 PM. Reason: removed pointless size 1 tags..
  Quote
Old 26-11-2008, 4:40 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveC View Post
so nobody can really tell if the RGB LED variety of backlight will offer anything over regular white LEDs.
Seeing €œGreen Displays€ at FPD International 2008 | LEDinside - Let There Be Light with LED

It says Samung's RGB LED backlight uses 50% of the power consumption as their White LED backlight. I don't know if that has been shown in Sony's X4500 though. From this you could maybe assume that Samsung's successor to the A656 will have a white LED backlight, and the higher end sucessor to the A956 will have an RGB LED backlight? It's also meant to much easier to calibrate the white balance with an RGB LED backlight.

Last edited by ziffius; 26-11-2008 at 4:48 PM.
  Quote
Thanks from:
DaveC (27-11-2008), weblah (27-11-2008)
Old 26-11-2008, 4:43 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by weblah View Post
I didn't realise that the LED BLUs were so new - I thought that these were the 2nd gens. Guess I was wrong


The A786/ A956 are second generation. The first generation was the F96/F97 Samsung LE52F96BD 52in LED LCD TV Review - TV Reviews - TrustedReviews.
  Quote
Old 26-11-2008, 4:51 PM   #6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Due to high production costs, the penetration rate of LED backlighting in LCD TV applications may only reach 10% of the total LCD TV market by 2012, according to LCD panel maker AU Optronics (AUO).

AUO executives indicated that currently the price for an LED lamp for a 42-inch LCD panel is 3.4 times more expensive than the price of a similar CCFL lamp. In terms of the entire backlight unit (BLU), Chi Mei Optoelectronics (CMO) noted that a white LED backlight unit (BLU) for a 42-inch LCD TV panel is 2-3 times more expensive than a CCFL solution, while a RGB LED BLU is five times more expensive than a CCFL BLU.

In terms of LED backlight technology, the AUO executives commented that the current direct-type LED backlight technology with local dimming and boosting would be replaced by edge-type LED backlight technology in the future and LED lighting efficiency will improve 10-20% annually.

AUO is planning to equip its LCD TV panels with edge-type LED backlight technology, which require fewer, but higher-powered LEDs in 2010.
Penetration rate of LED backlighting for LCD TV applications to only reach 10% in 2012, says AUO
  Quote
Thanks from:
DaveC (27-11-2008)
Old 27-11-2008, 10:36 AM   #7
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Experience Points:
2,291, Level: 11
Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 1
Posts: 14
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziffius View Post
Samung's RGB LED backlight uses 50% of the power consumption as their White LED backlight....you could maybe assume that Samsung's successor to....the A956 will have an RGB LED backlight? It's also meant to much easier to calibrate the white balance with an RGB LED backlight.
Other than the mamoth energy saving, is there anything else WRT picture quality?
I thought the A956 was relatively new and you are referring to a successor!? - eek. Do you know if this successor would be weeks/months/a year away? . . . I can hear the Samsung beckoning me
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 1:30 PM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by weblah View Post
Other than the mamoth energy saving, is there anything else WRT picture quality?
I thought the A956 was relatively new and you are referring to a successor!? - eek. Do you know if this successor would be weeks/months/a year away? . . . I can hear the Samsung beckoning me
Normally they have a 12month lifespan before being replaced. It's rumoured that the replacement for the A656/ A686 will have a BLU, presumably the B656. The A756 could also be replaced as although it was slow to show up here, it was avalible in the US about a month after their A656.

I have a feeling they might refresh the A956 with a Divx certified version marchish. Although the A956 will play Divx files, it isn't certified. According to a Divx press release, Samsung are releasing Divx certified TV's early next year. DivX, Inc. - Samsung and DivX Announce Agreement to Add DivX Video Support to Leading Line of Digital Televisions.

Any 2009 new models should be announced in six weeks time at CES next 8th-11th January. A high end TV like the A956 has the potential to be discounted in the January sales with the credit crunch effecting the high end TV's the most.

Last edited by ziffius; 27-11-2008 at 1:39 PM.
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 2:01 PM   #9
Distinguished Member
 
ChrisGgr's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greece
Experience Points:
210,527, Level: 100
Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 897, Got 1,655
Posts: 14,173
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

but what would actually give a benefit to samsung to introduce the LED BLU on the successor of A656?This mid range model needs to be priced at a very competitive price and with economic crisis prices will be driven even more down.furthermore this plan doesnt collocate with samsung's ranging.there would be no reason for someone to buy the hi end 9 series!
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 2:28 PM   #10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRISGEO View Post
but what would actually give a benefit to samsung to introduce the LED BLU on the successor of A656?This mid range model needs to be priced at a very competitive price and with economic crisis prices will be driven even more down.furthermore this plan doesnt collocate with samsung's ranging.there would be no reason for someone to buy the hi end 9 series!
I did say it was a rumour, I imagine there's a 50/50 chance of it becoming true. There will still be plenty of models above it, and it still won't be competition for the 9 series. Next year mid range could be LED.

I imagine it was already planned before the credit crunch started. We knew there was going to be a LED 9 series from early this year. It takes quite a while to design a new set and will already be designed. There are already references to next years 5 series 'B' model numbers from Samsung. It looks like next years 5 series are this years 6, this is how Samsung is going to save money.

The 40A786 can be had from Robert Whyte for 869 with a 5 year warrenty included, just 130 more than the A686. It's clear that Samsung are working on both White HiddenWires - Freescale and Samsung Electronics Announce Collaboration on LED Display Technology and RGB backlights, so you got assume the RGB are for the higher end models.

Last edited by ziffius; 27-11-2008 at 3:10 PM.
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 2:46 PM   #11
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Experience Points:
2,291, Level: 11
Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 1
Posts: 14
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziffius View Post
I have a feeling they might refresh the A956 with a Divx certified version marchish. Although the A956 will play Divx files, it isn't certified. According to a Divx press release, Samsung are releasing Divx certified TV's early next year. DivX, Inc. - Samsung and DivX Announce Agreement to Add DivX Video Support to Leading Line of Digital Televisions.
Great! - this isnt the first time I have read about Samsung about mid-range. I guess I am not too bothered about a certificate. Especially if (as you say / I have seen elsewhere) the current version already plays them!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziffius View Post
Any 2009 new models should be announced in six weeks time at CES next 8th-11th January. A high end TV like the A956 has the potential to be discounted in the January sales with the credit crunch effecting the high end TV's the most.
Grrrr. This, however, is a problem - it's the opposite of what I have heard / read elsewhere
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 3:05 PM   #12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by weblah View Post
Grrrr. This, however, is a problem - it's the opposite of what I have heard / read elsewhere
The reason why Sony are likely to put up prices is because the Pound is doing very poorly against the Yen GBP to JPY Share Price Chart | GBPJPY=X | | Yahoo! Finance UK. Some of the Japanese manufacturers are really struggling. Sony/ Pansonic/ Pioneer can probably get away with this as they have a reasonibly large fanbase who will buy regardless, but the likes of Toshiba, JVC, Hitachi could be in serious trouble.

It's very different against the Korean currency the Won. The pound is actually doing reasonably well against it, so they don't need to increase prices. GBP to KRW Share Price Chart | GBPKRW=X | | Yahoo! Finance UK The question is will LG/ Samsung keep the prices as they are and attempt to get a bigger market share when the Japanese firms up the prices, or will they follow the Japanese and increase the prices and then make more of profit on each set.

Last edited by ziffius; 27-11-2008 at 3:10 PM.
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 3:05 PM   #13
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Experience Points:
2,291, Level: 11
Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11 Points: 2,291, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 1
Posts: 14
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziffius View Post
...you got assume the RGB are for the higher end models.
I guess this again touches on part 3 of the original post. Is the assumption based purely on the fact that RGB BLU allows white balance to be set better and provides improved power consumption? Or are there other factors you are taking into consideration?
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 3:06 PM   #14
Distinguished Member
 
ChrisGgr's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greece
Experience Points:
210,527, Level: 100
Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 897, Got 1,655
Posts: 14,173
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziffius View Post
I did say it was a rumour, I imagine there's a 50/50 chance of it becoming true. There will still be plenty of models above it, and it still won't be competition for the 9 series. Next year mid range could be LED.

I imagine it was already planned before the credit crunch started. It takes quite a while to design a new set and will already be designed. there are already references to next years 5 series 'B' model numbers from Samsung. It looks like next years 5 series are this years 6. We knew there was going to be a LED 9 series from early this year.

The 40A786 can be had from Robert Whyte for 869 with a 5 year warrenty included, just 130 more than the A686. It's clear that Samsung are working on both White HiddenWires - Freescale and Samsung Electronics Announce Collaboration on LED Display Technology and RGB backlights, so you got assume the RGB are for the higher end models.
what references are there about B 5 series?
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 3:22 PM   #15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRISGEO View Post
what references are there about B 5 series?
Product numbers are LE32B530P7W,LE37B530P7W LE40B530P7W,LE46B530P7W,LE32B550A5W LE37B550A5W,LE40B550A5W,LE46B550A5W along with the 'B' 6 series Plasmas PN50B650S1F,PN58B650S1F.

It's possible LE40B550A5 could have 100hz.

Last edited by ziffius; 27-11-2008 at 3:32 PM.
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 3:57 PM   #16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

From doing more digging, there are new 4,5,6,7 series. No new 8 or 9 series. It looks like there will only be one new 7 series model, 4 new 6 series but they are including the B550 in that for some reason and 2 other 5 series models. Maybe It's a typo the B550A5W is really the B650A5W.

LCD project names are LB4Q, LB5K, LB5P (listed as B530), LB6A, LB6N, LB6R, LB6T (listed as B550), LB7U. Plasmas are PB5G and PB5S.

Last edited by ziffius; 27-11-2008 at 4:30 PM.
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 4:25 PM   #17
Distinguished Member
 
ChrisGgr's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greece
Experience Points:
210,527, Level: 100
Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 897, Got 1,655
Posts: 14,173
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

link about them?
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 8:21 PM   #18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

It's on one of the manuals sites. No manuals yet though, just placeholders with no real information other than the model numbers and project names They added entries for the BD-P1600/XAA & BD-P3600 (expected P2600, another typo?) over a week ago but still haven't put the manuals up, so I guess they're keeping the '09 lineup close to their chest.

Last edited by ziffius; 27-11-2008 at 8:24 PM.
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 8:35 PM   #19
Distinguished Member
 
ChrisGgr's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greece
Experience Points:
210,527, Level: 100
Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 897, Got 1,655
Posts: 14,173
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

yeah you mean ibbank?logical not to put manuals up!I guess CES is the time...
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 8:56 PM   #20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Yeah ibbank. It's totally ironic, they put manuals on there sometimes months before the TV's are even announced. But Samsung's official webpages are totally useless, they still don't have the A686 or A786 on the UK website. I am wondering if it's harmed the sales of the A686 & A786 in any way, as they don't seem to have sold as well as I expect them to, especially the A786. If you look on a companies website you expect to see all of their current models, and some people may not be aware of the A786. None of the A686-A956 seem to have been a runaway sucess like the A656 was in the first few months.

Although Samsung have performed much better than all the other manufacturers over the year and saw much better growth year on year, in the last quarter both Sony and Sharp saw more growth than Samsung. The W4500 may have changed Sony's fortunes for this year....
  Quote
Old 27-11-2008, 9:57 PM   #21
Distinguished Member
 
ChrisGgr's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greece
Experience Points:
210,527, Level: 100
Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100 Points: 210,527, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 897, Got 1,655
Posts: 14,173
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

actually yeah W4000 and W4500 were big sellers and key for sony's success and growth of ms and sales.the 40786 has very low sales although its not expensive.the A956 hasnt anyway been intended to sell so much,mainly because of the size and the price(exept UK where its priced well).
  Quote
Old 28-11-2008, 3:50 PM   #22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Experience Points:
79,103, Level: 68
Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68 Points: 79,103, Level: 68
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 306
Posts: 1,887
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

More confirmation of Samsung's future sets having RGB LED BLU

Solid State Lighting Net - Document
  Quote
Old 28-11-2008, 4:16 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
sparkymark75's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fife
Experience Points:
8,027, Level: 21
Points: 8,027, Level: 21 Points: 8,027, Level: 21 Points: 8,027, Level: 21
Activity: 1.0%
Activity: 1.0% Activity: 1.0% Activity: 1.0%
Thanks: Gave 99, Got 126
Posts: 1,639
Re: LED BLU vs CCFL

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziffius View Post
Yeah ibbank. It's totally ironic, they put manuals on there sometimes months before the TV's are even announced. But Samsung's official webpages are totally useless, they still don't have the A686 or A786 on the UK website. I am wondering if it's harmed the sales of the A686 & A786 in any way, as they don't seem to have sold as well as I expect them to, especially the A786. If you look on a companies website you expect to see all of their current models, and some people may not be aware of the A786. None of the A686-A956 seem to have been a runaway sucess like the A656 was in the first few months.

Although Samsung have performed much better than all the other manufacturers over the year and saw much better growth year on year, in the last quarter both Sony and Sharp saw more growth than Samsung. The W4500 may have changed Sony's fortunes for this year....
Details on the 786 are on the website it's just not listed in the same way as the others so you need to know the model number. Maybe their keeping it a secret
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off