Quote:
|
Originally Posted by clivem2 Don't you think your campaign against the HD5 bass is getting a touch over the top? I like to think of myself as an audiophile, I have various valve amps and some seriously good speakers. For music on MP3 type player the reality is different. For my hi-fi I like a very well balanced sound. For an MD or MP3 I need to boost the bass - even with good phones. It's the same with 5.1 sound, the requirements are different. I strongly believe you are in a minority in wanting flat (bland?) bass for an MP3. I do want a flat response for my hi-fi system. The requirements are different. |
The iPod's response has a falloff in bass with low-impedance phones. That has to be considered against the underlying higher sound quality of the iPod against the HD5... and it's not just against the iPod that the HD5 sounds somewhat lacking against in terms of quality. ATRAC3+ and the smooth tuning of the HD5 provides a euphonic sound, but the 'flavour' can be matched by other non-iPod MP3 players with EQ and the overall quality exceeded.
I think the ATRAC vs MP3 debate is somewhat overblown. ATRAC3+ does very well at bitrates where the word 'quality' isn't yet a major issue. 64K ATRAC3+ does a very convincing impression of an older-codec 128K MP3 for example. However at 256K, it's neck and neck when compared with a modern MP3 encoder (especially LAME).
To get around the bass issue of the iPod is pretty simple and I don't know why it's not publicised more. Just plug in a pair of medium-impedance phones. 60 ohms will do it, and a number of quality (still portable) headphones are available with a 50+ ohm impedance. Don't get me wrong... I like a balanced sound with a slight kick in the lows, and with the headphones I usually use with the iPod (the £130 70 ohm Sennheiser HD25-1, and the £1,800 70 ohm Sony Qualia 010 with custom short cabling), there's a decent amount of bass on offer because they get around the iPod's bass falloff (and in the case of the HD25-1, it's a fairly bassy phone). Fifty quid even in overpriced UKP will get you the (typically $40 in the states) Koss Portapro, which is another higher-impedance phone with a bass kick.
It's also not just about the sound. If it was only down to differences in the sound, I'd be leaning towards the Sony since it doesn't have the falloff. However the Sony has severely restricted flexibility in loading and also in playlisting. Control is also rather hit and miss. You may not care about playlisting because you don't use it on the HD5, but that's because the playlisting is unnecessarily tricky to use. The iPod's very advanced, highly automated playlisting facilities, controllable and easy navigation, easy track navigation with long files and it's ease of sync among other everyday-use niceties lacking from the HD5 are really what attracts me to the Apple.
I think too many people who make a point of trying to be different from the iPod masses don't look at the fact that the iPod is basically a good player. And too many people who believe that Sony are their anti-iPod answer don't look at the fact that in many ways the HD5 represents the worst of Sony because they're rushing products to market trying to create a "SonyPod" without innovating and without thinking everything through.
I know we can argue for ever if the player you've bought and are talking about is better or worse than something else. I have both the iPod and the HD5 as well as iAudio, iRiver, Rio and Creative etc players. And it's my opinion that the Sony has the most outwardly pleasing sound when no EQ is engaged and when low-impedance phones are used, but even if we take the iPod out of the equation the quality lags behind (sometimes by just a hair, other times in a quite major way) the other players. And since other non-iPod players have fully working EQ's, you can match the 'pleasantness' of the HD5's sound with EQ. You can also pair many of the UMS (USB Mass storage) players like the iRiver and iAudios with very powerful management and syncing software such as j.River Media Center, which makes Sonicstage look like a really bad joke. I could go on for a long time really... but it's worth taking a look at what else is avaialble.
The HD5 is a nice enough machine for ad hoc listening and enough control over the sound to satisfy many. It also has the battery life and size. However other players offer higher sound quality and in some cases better sound shaping options. And as mentioned, the iPod outstrips the Sony in terms of innovative listening features as well as basic navigation.
I'm not ultimately just saying 'get the iPod over the HD5' because there's many good things with other players too. However if asked to choose specifically between the iPod and the HD5 as in this thread, I'd go for the new iPod every time.
Whew. That was an opus!