Online link for the cable =
www.themagazineshop.com/chord though for a RRP of eighty smackers I expect all 200 are gone!
I was going to reply to this yesterday but decided to read the mag again - and also dug out the 2006 edition. 2006's budget DVD Recorder Award was ridiculous, it went to the Panny recorder with only an analogue tuner (ES15), requiring a separate Freeview box unless you had Sky. That was plain bad advice to give that an award, no matter how cheap it was, the trade-off was too great. They've sorted that this year. However, they removed one accessory and it's almost as if they didn't bother testing for new headphones, stands, phono stages and learning remotes. Similarly, the MP3 Awards might as well be "Best Ipod".
It should have been made clear they were dropping SCART and aerial leads from 2006, then it wouldn't have looked like a whitewash when QED swept the board in all but two categories. They also should have made it clear that to get the best from the QED Quenex TTV, you had to spend another £20-30 on the RVR add-on - it does look great, but this hidden cost was never mentioned any time the cable was recommended, so again, incomplete advice as to the true cost.
Someone else will have to tell me whether all 3 Onkyos were previous supertest winners in 2007 or whether it was just the TX-SR605. If the other two models weren't, and are just hanging on the coat tails of the one surprise, then people have every right to dispute the results.
To balance this out - I've bought award winners before in What Hi Fi's history, two VCRs from 10 and 14 years ago when I knew even less than now, I don't paint myself as an expert. The recorders gave me the ten years you'd expect. Better recorders and newer technologies have been here for ages but I've been waiting for the right price/performance balance. I was already looking at the EZ27 because of my brother's positive experience with the 25 from last year, and the Award was the icing on the cake considering I'd picked two other Panny Award winners from yesteryear and never had a complaint.
There are always going to be some glaring perceived or factual errors and omissions in Awards lists, from little old What Hi Fi all the way to the Oscars for film (the latter being worse, film's totally subjective). Once you buy a really great DVD *player*, what can you do to see that great picture - beyond changing the interconnect, nothing unless you want a whole new screen. Physical aesthetics shouldn't matter but they do - no matter how many awards NAD won for their gear, their trademark style is Marmite - personally, I think they looked pig-ugly and I'd choose a different brand even if their equipment was the best, until they change the way they look. It's wrong, but that's how I feel considering I keep my gear until it dies rather than chopping and changing.
On balance, if like me the Awards issue is the only one of WHF that you buy and keep each year, then yes, some parts look like they don't bother re-examining it from year to year (accessories) but then other areas are moving so fast that it's a bit of a hot seat (eg flatscreen tellies) and you just have to buy it and not look back until it's replacement time. Speaking of that HDMI lead they're giving away, it's also a bit stupid to go mad about that when the RRP's £35 higher than last year's winner - clearly you get what you pay for - but hopefully on the net it's much cheaper and price won't matter.
Sorry for the long post

, but it's not a simple issue.