Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Lightfoot Hi Zippy,
I've had a look at the back of some double sockets which I have lying around, and sure enough they all say 13A - but that could be because the spec is per single socket (so each socket is 13A making a total of 26A). The wikipedia entry for BS1363 seems to suggests that it's the plug that is limiting the load, not the socket itself, since most of the text seems to revolve around the plug. Even if you read the text knowing that 13A is the limit (for a double socket) it's very hard to actually get the spec to tell you that.
Thing is I could see how that can be interpreted as one double drawing 26A being OK on 2.5mm T&E because the cable can take 27A (IIRC) if clipped correctly, so adding another would potentially put the cable in danger. Limiting the current is the obvious thing to do. Radials are usually 20A for example so you'd think the same principle was being applied there. 26A is fine for a double because the circuit is a ring.
It's terribly ambiguous and you would think the regs would make the 13A limitation known within its' text more clearly if that was the case, especially as much of BS1363 seems to refer to plugs rather than S/Os (and the BS1363 socket info appears to suggest it's more of a receptacle/safety spec rather than for current carrying capacity). The fact you say that you're sure a large percentage of electricians are unaware of it proves the point. Diversity seems to be the safety factor rather than anything else if 13A for a double is the case.
Do you have a link or can you reference something that I could look at that states it definitively?
Thanks
Gary |
Hi Garry,
I’ve been struggling to find an external link (much to my annoyance

); at work we have access to a subscription based database which allows us to download PDF’s of each standard (not allowed to pass them on as our company name gets put across the page). BS 1363 is split into several documents of which part 2 is the relevant section for socket outlets etc. Skimming through it I couldn’t see a conclusive line stating the overall rating for a double socket, but it is ambiguously implied.
When I’m referring to the spur scenario I’m trying to identify that if the load exceeds 13A you need to provide a means of limiting the current regardless of cable size. If a double socket was rated at 26A you would be required to limit the current to 13A, however this is not the case. If a single double socket is ok then why not two singles?
Also I feel if sockets were rated at 26A they would need to clearly say 2x13A, not 13A or 26A. I’ve had a look around work at some technical sheets which indicate some manufacturers test their sockets to 20A but certainly not 26A; however they are still officially only rated at 13A total.
I also found this in the past which I did post some time ago in another thread:
‘All MK socket-outlets are manufactured to comply with BS1363 part 2: 1995 and are rated at 13A per unit. Double socket-outlets have been manufactured and tested to exceed this rating by margin that allows electrical safety and reduces the risk of heat and mechanical damage to components due to overloading. It should be noted that BS1363 part 2: 1995 does not allow double sockets to operate at twice the permissable maximum loading and it should be remembered that double socket-outlets are not manufactured to be able to withstand a 26A load for sustained periods of time. Research by ourselves and third party organisations has shown that all MK double sockets can safely withstand a continuous load of 19.5A for an indefinite period. Increasing the load slightly will begin to cause heat and mechanical stresses on the components in a relatively shortperiod. Testing showed that a load of 22.3A was sufficientto cause heat stress that would cause a browning of the faceplates and sufficient heat to cause insulation damage to cable cores. A load of 24A for 43 hours was sufficient to cause significant heat damage to the material in which the socket-oulet was situated and within 75 hours sufficient to cause significant damage that would lead to the very real potential of fire.’
I completely agree with you that this is not clear enough, which is evident by the fact that a large proportion of electricians are completely unaware of such limitations. The only way I could see this being made any clearer in the future would be if it became a problem (unlikely to be a problem as people have been doing this for years).