Quote:
Originally posted by Dan Gleebles At this moment I am well oiled, but I have to bring up something that really bugs me and I cannot normaly talk about. You all rave at the Shiva, but it is my guess that none of you have actualy measured its Th-Sm. Well in my position I have well documented its parameters so can someone explain to me why the Lab 12 is rated at 400W with a 160 oz magnet and the Shiva is rated at over 650W with a 60oz Magnet????
Remember Bl is like Litres to an engine. bigger magnets bigger magnetic fields bigger BL
I know thats not the be all and end where magnets are concerened (close tolerence air gaps and all) but the Shiva has a 60oz Mag the Lab 12 160oz?????
Your comments are welcome |
My next sub project will most likely envolve a Lab 12, I am very intersted in your comments about the woofer.
Manget size does not allways effect power handleing there are subwoofers with huge magnets but terible power handeling and suboofers with small magnets and high power handeling.
Compairing the 400rms to the 650 rms does not really work, most of the time these figures are a general a guideline and are totally dependent on the size and type of enclosure used.
Powerhandling in my opinion is a measure of a speakers performance before either power compression of the driver within x-max limits or driver execding the x-max limits and 9 times out of 10 bottoming the driver into its back plate.
The Shiva and lab 12 have very simular sensivities but the Shiva does have about 2.8mm more potential x-max over the lab 12, but the lab 12 does have a shade more cone area (SD) about 25 cm more.
They are fairly simalar drivers, in looking at enclosure models for both these drivers they are pritty close.