AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

Lutron Grafik eye power consumption question..

Post Reply
Old 26-03-2007, 1:04 AM   #1
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Experience Points:
4,877, Level: 16
Points: 4,877, Level: 16 Points: 4,877, Level: 16 Points: 4,877, Level: 16
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 58
Lutron Grafik eye power consumption question..

hi, I recently read somewhere (not a very reliable source!) that the grafik eye 310x series is very inefficient. And that, for example, when a zone is at 10% light it uses the same watts as if the lights were in 100%! Is there any truth to this?
  Quote
Old 26-03-2007, 7:48 AM   #2
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Experience Points:
3,459, Level: 13
Points: 3,459, Level: 13 Points: 3,459, Level: 13 Points: 3,459, Level: 13
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 14
Posts: 60
Re: Lutron Grafik eye power consumption question..

Dimmers "consume" around 1-2% of the connected load. They DO NOT simply divert to power away from the lamp.

A long time ago, a dimmer would just divert power away from the lamp, and therefore you wouldn't save energy. But that was 30+ years ago.

Almost every dimmer available today uses "phase control", which mean it chops the waveform. Basically, it turns the power on and off 100 times per second. There's 2 methods, leading edge (triac), and trailing edge (transistor). Both dim the lights. Both save energy when you dim the lights. And it's almost linear too, so dimming the lights to 10% means you will save 90% of the energy.

Also, when you dim the lights you extend the lamplife. So that saves you money on replacements. Even at 95% (which you can't see the difference), the lamplife is still doubled.

There's a lot of talk about using compact fluorescents instead. What isn't talked about is that they are usually low power factor, which affects that actual power used. So combined with the extra energy needed to manufacture these lamps, they are NOT the carbon-friendly light that many make them out to be.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off