Quote:
Originally Posted by DorKnight Briefly, if you don't mind, how do you like the Benchmark DAC1 as the new USB version has taken my fancy and may go down that route rather than upgrading my Zhaolu with a ZapFilter? |
The DAC1 is a lovely DAC, there's no doubt about that. Fantastic sound that compares favourably with most DACs I've heard in that price-range. I've listened to a Zhalou as well, which is obviously considerably cheaper than the Benchmark. I was impressed with it too. I wouldn't trade my Benchmark for one, but I'd certainly not be upset if I owned the Zhalou, especially at the price, great little DAC.
In terms of the USB version of the DAC1, I'll reserve comment on it until I've heard it, but for the moment I'm ignoring USB completely until I2S becomes common-place (and more affordable) as every single USB implementation I've heard has fallen well short of the other digital options available on the DACs. At the moment, it just sounds a bit muddy and inaccurate to my ears. Granted, my experiences have been limited to just a few DACs in this regard, but the reasons behind this performance (and the workaround that I2S is purported to provide) has convinced me that I'm best off leaving the technology to develop for the moment. I haven't been able to test the I2S technology yet though, due to costs, so my theory could be wrong there anyway!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Just Listen Off topic slightly, but out of interest how does the Benchmark compare to the Audio Opus? I was actually planning on buying the Audio Opus until I found out about the Benchmark (I already had a Denon A11 for a transport). I now also have a Townshend 565 which is a similar price to the Audio Opus (maybe slightly more), but is a universal player as I have a substantial SACD and DVD-A collection. It's CD performance is better than the Benchmark do you find the same with the Audio Opus? |
In terms of CD performance there's no real contest, the Opus 21 outguns the DAC1 by quite some way. It's not specifically one thing that I can point to, but rather every area. The bass is a bit better, the treble is a bit sweeter, timing and resolution has an edge etc etc, all of which adds up to make one big difference that, to my ears, puts the Opus 21 in a totally different league to the DAC1.
Oddly enough, and it's something I've mentioned a few times in various threads, the use of the DAC1 vs Opus 21 as a DAC for my PC yields a slightly different result.
The Opus 21 only allows for a digital-coax in if you want to use the onboard DAC for an external source. The DAC1, though, allows for an optical signal, and when using my PC as the source, the DAC1 seems to outshine the Opus 21 by a small margin. When I started looking into reasons as to why this might be so when the Opus 21 so clearly beats out the DAC1 for CD replay, it was pointed out to me that digi-coax is susceptible to noise that could be introduced by the PC (PSU/RFI etc) while optical remains unaffected.
I don't know how true that is, but it makes sense. Using another transport less prone to this noise would seem the obvious way to test this theory, but for the moment it's not something I've looked into any further.
But in answer to your question, for CD-only performance, the Opus 21 is a very clear winner.