Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Audio Electronics > Headphones and Headphone Amps

Today's price checkPowered by
Bose On-Ear Headphones
Bose In-Ear Headphones
Sennheiser RS 130
Sennheiser CX 300-II
Bose On-Ear Headphones 
Bose In-Ear Headphones 
Sennheiser RS 130 
Sennheiser CX 300-II 
Bose Around-Ear Headphones 
Sennheiser CX 400-II 
Sennheiser CX 300 
Sennheiser PX 100 
MonsterCable Beats by Dr. Dre 
Sennheiser RS 140 
 More...Prices updated November 22nd at 1:30pm and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-03-2006, 8:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,604
Thanks: Gave 27, Got 136
Senn CX300...very jog unfriendly!!

30 minutes on a treadmill is boring, so yesterday I decided to buy my first MP3 player (a Sony) and naturally chucked away the freebie headphones.

I planned to use my existing Sennheiser MX500's, but they are a bit too big for my ears, so when I saw the 'ear canal' CX300's (which everyone is raving about) for sale in the same store, I bought them too.

However, they are definately NOT suitable for jogging. If you intend to buy them for the gym..... forget it! Stick with regular ear buds.
Every step generates a loud thump in your head. After the first 30 seconds on the treadmill I had to take them out... it really isn't pleasant and I've got ear ache now.

I imaging they'd be very good for sitting still on public transport (I don't use public transport) but they should be avoided for anything else.

I also think the bass is too heavy and hard aswell.
So although I'm a Sennheiser fan (I have a pair of the awsome HD600's aswell), I feel I need to redress the balance on the glowing reviews of these ear phones scattered all over the web.

Although they probably are quite good for this type of product, I reckon other phones would be a better choice for most people.

I imagine selling the CX300's would be difficult. Despite my fanatical ear hygene, the rubber seals have become slightly 'tacky'. I'm sure noone would fancy them second hand.


I'm now looking for a pair of decent 'vertical' ear buds to see if they are better suited to the gym and my tiny lug holes.
Any recommendations?
__________________
Oh I'm sure we can handle this situation maturely.... Isn't that right, Mr Poopy Pants?
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 12:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,389
Thanks: Gave 72, Got 127
I agree with you - they arent good for excersing. I wish you had come here first - I would have told you this.

I love mine, but I dont exercise with them. Personally i dont really think any ear bud / canal phones are good for exercising - I'd prefer clip-ons like the Koss KSC-75.
__________________
HOME CINEMA: TV: Panasonic TH42PX70 Satellite: Thomson Sky HD Media PC / Gaming rig: HP Pavilion Elite M9361
HIFI: Source: HP Pavilion Elite M9361 into Beresford TC-7510 Mk6 Amp: Harman Kardon HK6550 Speakers: Rega Ela Headphone rig: ANT Audio Amber into Sennheiser HD600
pbirkett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 9:20 AM   #3 (permalink)
shadowritten
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If quality isn't your major consideration, the Sony MDR-J20 stays in the ears comfortably and without undue shifting about during exercise. Used to use these in the gym a couple of years back.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 1:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,604
Thanks: Gave 27, Got 136
I'm sticking with my MX500's.
Is it just my odd shaped ears, or does everyone else find that when you insert ordinary ear buds vertically (making them stick out and look stupid) they sound 100 times better?

To be honest, the MX500's really outclass the CX300's in this position. they sound much more open and balanced. Going back to the CX300's sounds boxy and unnatural.

So if I can find an equivalent of the MX500's but designed for vertical insertion (and therefore more discreet) I'll buy them.
__________________
Oh I'm sure we can handle this situation maturely.... Isn't that right, Mr Poopy Pants?
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 9:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,389
Thanks: Gave 72, Got 127
Horses for courses, but I had the MX500's and to be honest they arent a patch on the CX300s in any respect (in my opinion). They are uncomfortable, dont fit in my ears properly, offer zero isolation and lack bass.

Like I say though, each to their own
__________________
HOME CINEMA: TV: Panasonic TH42PX70 Satellite: Thomson Sky HD Media PC / Gaming rig: HP Pavilion Elite M9361
HIFI: Source: HP Pavilion Elite M9361 into Beresford TC-7510 Mk6 Amp: Harman Kardon HK6550 Speakers: Rega Ela Headphone rig: ANT Audio Amber into Sennheiser HD600
pbirkett is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
cx300very, jog, senn, unfriendly
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:43 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting