Quote:
Originally posted by Hawklord Hi
I have the solo MKIII and was wandering if you bought the MKIV or had the MKIII upgraded. If you had it upgraded what are the major difference and do you feel it was a worthwhile one? How much did it cost and what was the leadtime involved getting the work done?
I'm still waiting delivery on my cable upgrade (cardas) for my HD600's I'll post my findings when it finally materialises but I'm told there is about a 200Hr burn in period. |
I originally had the 2004 Solo. There were only a handful in existence. Graham Slee has now modified it to include the new op-amp. Apart from the case it is now identical to the new look version about to be launched.
I've been running in the Solo for the past few days. I'm not very good at reviews but will report back shortly after having a listening test. All I can say at the moment is that the sound is excellent.
It's the only headphone amp I've heard so my only comparison is with the headpone sockets on my stereo amp, AV amp and CD player.
I don't know if Graham is upgrading MKIIIs.
As for whether it's been worthwhile I have to say that there may have been better ways to spend £400 to improve my system.
The new look model will cost £449 which seems a lot of money to me.
I'll be interested to see what you make of the Cardas cable although I was thinking of trying the Meier cable which is a lot cheaper I believe.
Cheers