Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunderland
some nice clocks there lord Bunky m8,is the card nice and quiet m8 as i love my 4870 but am getting a bit bored so might try one of these out,is it stable at those speeds m8,cheers for any help,p.s were did you get yours from
Yeah, m8, its very quiet. I tried setting the card to 100% on the fan, it made some noise then, but on 50% theres not much sound at all. Its very stable too. One site, overclockersclub, i think it was called, got it up to 740 core.
***EDIT***
Only got to 702 on the core due to the Nvidia software not letting go past it.
__________________
Pioneer PDP LX5090 - Denon DVD2500BT - Oppo DV983H - Denon DCD700AE - Denon AVR4308(A) - M&K Xenon 36 and 26 surrounds - VX850SF sub - Virgin V+HD - Logitech Harmony One - Xbox 360 - PS3.
Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
bet you were gutted m8,so they are due in on the 12th then,i see there are selling the evga for a few quid more but its clocked higher apart from the shader clock but im sure it could go upto the xfx speed
and why is it always a friday so you have to pay sat delivery money to get it as they know you want it
Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
I couldn't recommend this store myself as I have never shopped with them, but they seem to be doing the black for £220 (don't know how much delivery is). may be worth checking them out if they are legit.
Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
thats the card i was going to get in its place but its 200 less in the shader department and dont know if it would clock to that speed of the xfx,so might just hold on
The 55nm GPU consumes roughly 50% less power than it was the case with 65nm one, and this difference is more than massive. When I did quick power checks, the GTX280 at 650/1500/2200 would eat around 266W, while the default clocked GTX280 (600/1300/2200) was specc’ed at 238W.
Well, the 55nm GPU will eat around 170W at 650/1500/2200, meaning that GTX290 just got 100W of power to play with. If you’re into overclocking, you can now start dreaming about clocking those 240 shaders to 1.7-1.8 GHz range (perhaps even 2.0 if water-cooling setup is powerful enough), and achieve massive performance gains, all happening while you’re consuming less power than a stock clocked GTX280.
If thats true I will wait until these new chips are out before jumping in
__________________
Cosmos s / i7 D0 4ghz / Asus P6t Deluxe v2 / OCZ 6gb / EK 4870x2 / XSPC 360+120 / HeatKiller v3 / TX750 / Win7 / Mint 7 / Steam- HOUGHSX / Xfire- HOUGHSX
Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
yes but you will find that they come in higher priced than the ones now and IMO they wont be much better than what they are using now,but that is just me
Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunderland
yes but you will find that they come in higher priced than the ones now and IMO they wont be much better than what they are using now,but that is just me
You don't think they will release at the same price, maybe dropping the 65nm cards a little?, just thinking of the ATI cards and their price point as the 260 is in comp with the 4870. Also, 55nm is cheaper to manufacture?
Edit: Just seen this, interesting
"Unfortunately, the shrink is a mess and not working out well at all, so neither of those features panned out. Where does that leave us? With a shrunken GT200 that doesn't really perform any better or worse than the current part, but gives NVIDIA a little better breathing room. That is the current best case."
So they may just clock the stock speed higher and charge more?
The Black edition is very tempting as I only have a 4850, which is a very good card for the price. However, most games are optimised for Nvidia and with the new driver release is very impressive.
__________________
Cosmos s / i7 D0 4ghz / Asus P6t Deluxe v2 / OCZ 6gb / EK 4870x2 / XSPC 360+120 / HeatKiller v3 / TX750 / Win7 / Mint 7 / Steam- HOUGHSX / Xfire- HOUGHSX
Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
i dont even think it wil drop the 65nm cards as if you look now the 190 cores are still as expensive if not more than the 216 ones on the gtx260,well thats whats making me go back to nvidia the games that are getting optimized for them,because the 4870 plays all games at full no probs apart from crysis but no card plays that at the max,plus i hate the CCC panel
Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunderland
i dont even think it wil drop the 65nm cards as if you look now the 190 cores are still as expensive if not more than the 216 ones on the gtx260,well thats whats making me go back to nvidia the games that are getting optimized for them,because the 4870 plays all games at full no probs apart from crysis but no card plays that at the max,plus i hate the CCC panel
Been looking around and to be honest it looks like Nvidia have made a real mess of the 55nm shrink, so it looks like the current cards are better which means no need to wait.
Re: HD4870(512)vs.HD4870(1gig)vs.GTX280 vs. GTX260(216) ?
The 4850X2 also seems like a pretty good card, although it's a little more expensive that the Black. I think performance for money it is a bit better than the black but is apparently noisy and uses a lot of power (210W when idle).