Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Lifestyle Topics > General Chat

Latest AVForums Movie Reviews
Gray Lady Down - Original Motion Picture Soundtrack CD ReviewUp Blu-ray ReviewLéon Blu-ray ReviewNear Dark Blu-ray ReviewLogan's Run Blu-ray Review
Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, The Blu-ray ReviewStar Trek Blu-ray ReviewUFC 100: Lesnar vs. Mir (2009) Blu-ray ReviewThe New York Ripper Blu-ray ReviewHeat Blu-ray Review

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPhone repair question darthfuzz iPhone Discussions 3 08-04-2009 10:05 AM
TomTom 540 Live question. neil29 Satellite Navigation (Sat Nav) 3 07-03-2009 1:14 PM
Dab radio question MJR_UK DAB Digital Radio and FM Radio 6 06-03-2009 9:14 PM
A question regarding speakers paddy155 Speakers 6 06-03-2009 7:21 PM
Trivial PS3 display question inavacuum PS3 4 06-03-2009 7:13 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-03-2009, 6:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Iccz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Astro City
Posts: 1,292
Thanks: Gave 959, Got 976
Grammatical question

While talking with a friend and the word "texted" came into conversation, and to me this sounds terrible when used in conversation...

Quote:
I texted him earlier
Personally when i'm using the word text in a past tense i'll say something like:

Quote:
I sent him a text earlier
I've also seen people use text as a verb, for example:

Quote:
I text you last night
Quote:
I will text you later
Which just sounds a bit stupid to me...

The problem lies with the fact "text", to me is not a verb... it does not indicate that you are doing something, it is just the message, and as you'd assume from the word "text" just infact a bunch of text...
So although it takes a little longer to say it makes sense to go for my method of using a verb such as send or sent...

What is your take on this?
Sorry for the silly pedantic thread but things like this really bug me
__________________
My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites.
Iccz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 6:58 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
ste1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 285
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 50
Re: Grammatical question

TBH I'm not a fan of "texted" either; it just sounds wrong. However, I think it's only a matter of time before text is defined as both a noun and a verb and we'll just have to get used to it!
ste1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
j98
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 246
Thanks: Gave 55, Got 12
Re: Grammatical question

Even "a text" doesn't sound right now I think about it. "A message" makes more sense.
j98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:05 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
leej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 973
Thanks: Gave 369, Got 438
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iccz View Post
What is your take on this?
I've no take on it but have texted a mate to see what he thinks.

__________________
My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites.
leej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 47
Thanks: Gave 60, Got 39
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by ste1000 View Post
TBH I'm not a fan of "texted" either; it just sounds wrong. However, I think it's only a matter of time before text is defined as both a noun and a verb and we'll just have to get used to it!

texted isn't correct at all imo. it's like saying commonist instead of most common. i'll admit i do use text as a verb though in the contexts you mentioned
jassco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
whiskyboozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 305
Thanks: Gave 72, Got 40
Re: Grammatical question

According to Oxford English Dictionary there has been a verb to text since the 1500s. The modern usage has been adopted by them since 2004 and they use an example which includes the word 'texted'
whiskyboozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Iccz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Astro City
Posts: 1,292
Thanks: Gave 959, Got 976
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by j98 View Post
Even "a text" doesn't sound right now I think about it. "A message" makes more sense.
well "a text" is just short for "a text message"

I don't have a problem with shortening that down, it's just the context in which it is sometimes used.

I don't mind such as "i'll text you" etc as much as i'm guilty of using it, but the word "texted" just doesn't sound right to me at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by whiskyboozer View Post
According to Oxford English Dictionary there has been a verb to text since the 1500s. The modern usage has been adopted by them since 2004 and they use an example which includes the word 'texted'
I just found this:

Quote:
It isn't new actually. Although the verb 'to text' is a modern feature of today's English, you can actually trace it back to the 16th century when 'to text', in those days, was to write something in very large letters, in capital letters, in 'text hand'. And, if you look it up in a big dictionary these days, you'll often be told "this verbal use is now rather rare". Well it was rare until about 4 or 5 years ago. Since then of course, everybody's been using it, and it's produced a whole new family of words.
Interesting...
__________________
My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites.
Iccz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: Gave 53, Got 199
Re: Grammatical question

Iccz is correct in response to this "Question of grammar"
Steve.J.Davies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
signs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: nr burton on trent
Posts: 6,454
Thanks: Gave 807, Got 996
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by leej View Post
I've no take on it but have texted a mate to see what he thinks.

Has he texted "u" back yet ?
__________________
XBOX 360 paramount signs PSN Paramountsigns

Lines .. i must not be confrontational, i must not be confrontational,i must not be confrontational i must not be confrontational,i must not be confrontational,
signs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:59 PM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
LFC_SL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,995
Thanks: Gave 970, Got 1,851
Blog Entries: 6
Re: Grammatical question

Pronounce it as a mangled sounding "text-tud" if it bothers?

"Text" would have to be accepted as a verb through common usage. Just have to accept the times (which to be truthful has been a good number of years now...).

Same with "google"
__________________
Opinions expressed here are my own and do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites
Selling my Aluminium Macbook | Trading Rules - Read for Your Protection | DVDs
LFC_SL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 8:08 PM   #11 (permalink)
Moderator
 
leej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 973
Thanks: Gave 369, Got 438
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by signs View Post
Has he texted "u" back yet ?


Yes but I couldn't understand it I so texted him back and told him to ringed me instead
__________________
My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites.
leej is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks from:
Iccz (06-03-2009)
Old 06-03-2009, 8:32 PM   #12 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
signs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: nr burton on trent
Posts: 6,454
Thanks: Gave 807, Got 996
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by leej View Post


Yes but I couldn't understand it I so texted him back and told him to ringed me instead
coolieo
__________________
XBOX 360 paramount signs PSN Paramountsigns

Lines .. i must not be confrontational, i must not be confrontational,i must not be confrontational i must not be confrontational,i must not be confrontational,
signs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 3:19 AM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 150
Thanks: Gave 15, Got 12
Re: Grammatical question

People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot
kevandalice is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks from:
Ned Senior (07-03-2009)
Old 07-03-2009, 11:30 AM   #14 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Mr Incredible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St-Annes-On-Sea
Posts: 5,788
Thanks: Gave 661, Got 1,188
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevandalice View Post
People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot
How do you know they just can't pronounce "texts" properly?
__________________
| Bob | | Sony KL-50W2 | Denon 3805 + POA-T10 | Denon 2900 | B&Ws 604/602/LCR600 s3 7.1 | SVS B12-ISD | BFD | Showcenter 200 | Sky+(250GB) | Scorpion & Mark Grant |
| GA-EP45-UD3R | Q6700 @ 3.52GHZ | 8GB OCZ @ 1056 | XFX GTX260 | Corsair 650W TX | Thermalright 120 Extreme | Akasa Infinity |
Mr Incredible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:19 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stargate 9
Posts: 1,536
Thanks: Gave 330, Got 160
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevandalice View Post
People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot
You been listening to Radio 1 extra????
__________________
Yes I am quite mad BUT wish you peace and happiness all the same
Ned Senior is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
grammatical, question
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:57 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting