 | | |
06-03-2009, 6:47 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Astro City
Posts: 1,292
Thanks: Gave 959, Got 976 | Grammatical question
While talking with a friend and the word "texted" came into conversation, and to me this sounds terrible when used in conversation... Personally when i'm using the word text in a past tense i'll say something like: Quote: |
I sent him a text earlier
| I've also seen people use text as a verb, for example: Which just sounds a bit stupid to me...
The problem lies with the fact "text", to me is not a verb... it does not indicate that you are doing something, it is just the message, and as you'd assume from the word "text" just infact a bunch of text...
So although it takes a little longer to say it makes sense to go for my method of using a verb such as send or sent...
What is your take on this?
Sorry for the silly pedantic thread but things like this really bug me
__________________ My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites. |
| |
06-03-2009, 6:58 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 285
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 50 | Re: Grammatical question
TBH I'm not a fan of "texted" either; it just sounds wrong. However, I think it's only a matter of time before text is defined as both a noun and a verb and we'll just have to get used to it!
|
| |
06-03-2009, 7:05 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 246
Thanks: Gave 55, Got 12 | Re: Grammatical question
Even "a text" doesn't sound right now I think about it. "A message" makes more sense.
|
| |
06-03-2009, 7:05 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 973
Thanks: Gave 369, Got 438 | Re: Grammatical question Quote:
Originally Posted by Iccz What is your take on this? | I've no take on it but have texted a mate to see what he thinks.
__________________ My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites. |
| |
06-03-2009, 7:06 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 47
Thanks: Gave 60, Got 39 | Re: Grammatical question Quote:
Originally Posted by ste1000 TBH I'm not a fan of "texted" either; it just sounds wrong. However, I think it's only a matter of time before text is defined as both a noun and a verb and we'll just have to get used to it! |
texted isn't correct at all imo. it's like saying commonist instead of most common. i'll admit i do use text as a verb though in the contexts you mentioned
|
| |
06-03-2009, 7:21 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 305
Thanks: Gave 72, Got 40 | Re: Grammatical question
According to Oxford English Dictionary there has been a verb to text since the 1500s. The modern usage has been adopted by them since 2004 and they use an example which includes the word 'texted'
|
| |
06-03-2009, 7:33 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Astro City
Posts: 1,292
Thanks: Gave 959, Got 976 | Re: Grammatical question Quote:
Originally Posted by j98 Even "a text" doesn't sound right now I think about it. "A message" makes more sense. | well "a text" is just short for "a text message"
I don't have a problem with shortening that down, it's just the context in which it is sometimes used.
I don't mind such as "i'll text you" etc as much as i'm guilty of using it, but the word "texted" just doesn't sound right to me at all. Quote:
Originally Posted by whiskyboozer According to Oxford English Dictionary there has been a verb to text since the 1500s. The modern usage has been adopted by them since 2004 and they use an example which includes the word 'texted' | I just found this: Quote: |
It isn't new actually. Although the verb 'to text' is a modern feature of today's English, you can actually trace it back to the 16th century when 'to text', in those days, was to write something in very large letters, in capital letters, in 'text hand'. And, if you look it up in a big dictionary these days, you'll often be told "this verbal use is now rather rare". Well it was rare until about 4 or 5 years ago. Since then of course, everybody's been using it, and it's produced a whole new family of words.
| Interesting...
__________________ My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites. |
| |
06-03-2009, 7:48 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: Gave 53, Got 199 | Re: Grammatical question
Iccz is correct in response to this "Question of grammar" |
| |
06-03-2009, 7:52 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: nr burton on trent
Posts: 6,454
Thanks: Gave 807, Got 996 | Re: Grammatical question Quote:
Originally Posted by leej I've no take on it but have texted a mate to see what he thinks.  | Has he texted "u" back yet ?
__________________ XBOX 360 paramount signs PSN Paramountsigns
Lines .. i must not be confrontational, i must not be confrontational,i must not be confrontational i must not be confrontational,i must not be confrontational,
|
| |
06-03-2009, 7:59 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,995
Thanks: Gave 970, Got 1,851 | Re: Grammatical question
Pronounce it as a mangled sounding "text-tud" if it bothers?
"Text" would have to be accepted as a verb through common usage. Just have to accept the times (which to be truthful has been a good number of years now...).
Same with "google"
__________________ Opinions expressed here are my own and do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites |
| |
06-03-2009, 8:08 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 973
Thanks: Gave 369, Got 438 | Re: Grammatical question Quote:
Originally Posted by signs Has he texted "u" back yet ? |
Yes but I couldn't understand it I so texted him back and told him to ringed me instead
__________________ My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AV Forums or its associated websites. |
| |
06-03-2009, 8:32 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: nr burton on trent
Posts: 6,454
Thanks: Gave 807, Got 996 | Re: Grammatical question Quote:
Originally Posted by leej
Yes but I couldn't understand it I so texted him back and told him to ringed me instead | coolieo
__________________ XBOX 360 paramount signs PSN Paramountsigns
Lines .. i must not be confrontational, i must not be confrontational,i must not be confrontational i must not be confrontational,i must not be confrontational,
|
| |
07-03-2009, 3:19 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 150
Thanks: Gave 15, Got 12 | Re: Grammatical question
People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot
|
| |
07-03-2009, 11:30 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: St-Annes-On-Sea
Posts: 5,788
Thanks: Gave 661, Got 1,188 | Re: Grammatical question Quote:
Originally Posted by kevandalice People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot | How do you know they just can't pronounce "texts" properly?
__________________ | Bob | | Sony KL-50W2 | Denon 3805 + POA-T10 | Denon 2900 | B&Ws 604/602/LCR600 s3 7.1 | SVS B12-ISD | BFD | Showcenter 200 | Sky+(250GB) | Scorpion & Mark Grant |
| GA-EP45-UD3R | Q6700 @ 3.52GHZ | 8GB OCZ @ 1056 | XFX GTX260 | Corsair 650W TX | Thermalright 120 Extreme | Akasa Infinity | |
| |
07-03-2009, 12:19 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Stargate 9
Posts: 1,536
Thanks: Gave 330, Got 160 | Re: Grammatical question Quote:
Originally Posted by kevandalice People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot | You been listening to Radio 1 extra????
__________________ Yes I am quite mad BUT wish you peace and happiness all the same |
| | | |