AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

Grammatical question

Post Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 6:47 PM   #1
Moderator
 
Iccz's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Keystone City
Experience Points:
29,888, Level: 42
Points: 29,888, Level: 42 Points: 29,888, Level: 42 Points: 29,888, Level: 42
Activity: 24.2%
Activity: 24.2% Activity: 24.2% Activity: 24.2%
Thanks: Gave 3,753, Got 4,287
Posts: 19,785
Grammatical question

While talking with a friend and the word "texted" came into conversation, and to me this sounds terrible when used in conversation...

Quote:
I texted him earlier
Personally when i'm using the word text in a past tense i'll say something like:

Quote:
I sent him a text earlier
I've also seen people use text as a verb, for example:

Quote:
I text you last night
Quote:
I will text you later
Which just sounds a bit stupid to me...

The problem lies with the fact "text", to me is not a verb... it does not indicate that you are doing something, it is just the message, and as you'd assume from the word "text" just infact a bunch of text...
So although it takes a little longer to say it makes sense to go for my method of using a verb such as send or sent...

What is your take on this?
Sorry for the silly pedantic thread but things like this really bug me
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 6:58 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
ste v p's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oxford
Experience Points:
2,423, Level: 11
Points: 2,423, Level: 11 Points: 2,423, Level: 11 Points: 2,423, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 75, Got 112
Posts: 1,067
Re: Grammatical question

TBH I'm not a fan of "texted" either; it just sounds wrong. However, I think it's only a matter of time before text is defined as both a noun and a verb and we'll just have to get used to it!
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:05 PM   #3
j98 j98 is offline
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Experience Points:
3,649, Level: 14
Points: 3,649, Level: 14 Points: 3,649, Level: 14 Points: 3,649, Level: 14
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 55, Got 12
Posts: 344
Re: Grammatical question

Even "a text" doesn't sound right now I think about it. "A message" makes more sense.
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:05 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Leej's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Birmingham
Experience Points:
9,341, Level: 23
Points: 9,341, Level: 23 Points: 9,341, Level: 23 Points: 9,341, Level: 23
Activity: 9.5%
Activity: 9.5% Activity: 9.5% Activity: 9.5%
Thanks: Gave 860, Got 970
Posts: 3,432
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iccz View Post
What is your take on this?
I've no take on it but have texted a mate to see what he thinks.

  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:06 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
jassco's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Experience Points:
1,641, Level: 9
Points: 1,641, Level: 9 Points: 1,641, Level: 9 Points: 1,641, Level: 9
Activity: 1.5%
Activity: 1.5% Activity: 1.5% Activity: 1.5%
Thanks: Gave 648, Got 273
Posts: 1,655
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by ste1000 View Post
TBH I'm not a fan of "texted" either; it just sounds wrong. However, I think it's only a matter of time before text is defined as both a noun and a verb and we'll just have to get used to it!

texted isn't correct at all imo. it's like saying commonist instead of most common. i'll admit i do use text as a verb though in the contexts you mentioned
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:21 PM   #6
Member
 
whiskyboozer's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Experience Points:
4,381, Level: 15
Points: 4,381, Level: 15 Points: 4,381, Level: 15 Points: 4,381, Level: 15
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 110, Got 68
Posts: 949
Re: Grammatical question

According to Oxford English Dictionary there has been a verb to text since the 1500s. The modern usage has been adopted by them since 2004 and they use an example which includes the word 'texted'
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:33 PM   #7
Moderator
 
Iccz's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Keystone City
Experience Points:
29,888, Level: 42
Points: 29,888, Level: 42 Points: 29,888, Level: 42 Points: 29,888, Level: 42
Activity: 24.2%
Activity: 24.2% Activity: 24.2% Activity: 24.2%
Thanks: Gave 3,753, Got 4,287
Posts: 19,785
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by j98 View Post
Even "a text" doesn't sound right now I think about it. "A message" makes more sense.
well "a text" is just short for "a text message"

I don't have a problem with shortening that down, it's just the context in which it is sometimes used.

I don't mind such as "i'll text you" etc as much as i'm guilty of using it, but the word "texted" just doesn't sound right to me at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by whiskyboozer View Post
According to Oxford English Dictionary there has been a verb to text since the 1500s. The modern usage has been adopted by them since 2004 and they use an example which includes the word 'texted'
I just found this:

Quote:
It isn't new actually. Although the verb 'to text' is a modern feature of today's English, you can actually trace it back to the 16th century when 'to text', in those days, was to write something in very large letters, in capital letters, in 'text hand'. And, if you look it up in a big dictionary these days, you'll often be told "this verbal use is now rather rare". Well it was rare until about 4 or 5 years ago. Since then of course, everybody's been using it, and it's produced a whole new family of words.
Interesting...
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:48 PM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Experience Points:
12,200, Level: 26
Points: 12,200, Level: 26 Points: 12,200, Level: 26 Points: 12,200, Level: 26
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 58, Got 214
Posts: 2,671
Re: Grammatical question

Iccz is correct in response to this "Question of grammar"
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:52 PM   #9
Illustrious Member
 
signs's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: nr burton on trent
Experience Points:
30,704, Level: 42
Points: 30,704, Level: 42 Points: 30,704, Level: 42 Points: 30,704, Level: 42
Activity: 42.0%
Activity: 42.0% Activity: 42.0% Activity: 42.0%
Thanks: Gave 1,187, Got 2,118
Posts: 16,716
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by leej View Post
I've no take on it but have texted a mate to see what he thinks.

Has he texted "u" back yet ?
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 7:59 PM   #10
Moderator
 
Steven's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Experience Points:
61,727, Level: 60
Points: 61,727, Level: 60 Points: 61,727, Level: 60 Points: 61,727, Level: 60
Activity: 37.9%
Activity: 37.9% Activity: 37.9% Activity: 37.9%
Blog Entries: 42
Thanks: Gave 2,014, Got 4,411
Posts: 32,406
Re: Grammatical question

Pronounce it as a mangled sounding "text-tud" if it bothers?

"Text" would have to be accepted as a verb through common usage. Just have to accept the times (which to be truthful has been a good number of years now...).

Same with "google"
  Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 8:08 PM   #11
Moderator
 
Leej's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Birmingham
Experience Points:
9,341, Level: 23
Points: 9,341, Level: 23 Points: 9,341, Level: 23 Points: 9,341, Level: 23
Activity: 9.5%
Activity: 9.5% Activity: 9.5% Activity: 9.5%
Thanks: Gave 860, Got 970
Posts: 3,432
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by signs View Post
Has he texted "u" back yet ?


Yes but I couldn't understand it I so texted him back and told him to ringed me instead
  Quote
Thanks from:
Iccz (06-03-2009)
Old 06-03-2009, 8:32 PM   #12
Illustrious Member
 
signs's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: nr burton on trent
Experience Points:
30,704, Level: 42
Points: 30,704, Level: 42 Points: 30,704, Level: 42 Points: 30,704, Level: 42
Activity: 42.0%
Activity: 42.0% Activity: 42.0% Activity: 42.0%
Thanks: Gave 1,187, Got 2,118
Posts: 16,716
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by leej View Post


Yes but I couldn't understand it I so texted him back and told him to ringed me instead
coolieo
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 3:19 AM   #13
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Experience Points:
3,113, Level: 13
Points: 3,113, Level: 13 Points: 3,113, Level: 13 Points: 3,113, Level: 13
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 17, Got 16
Posts: 269
Re: Grammatical question

People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot
  Quote
Thanks from:
Ned Senior (07-03-2009)
Old 07-03-2009, 11:30 AM   #14
Illustrious Mumbler
 
Mr Incredible's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Fylde Coast
Experience Points:
19,488, Level: 33
Points: 19,488, Level: 33 Points: 19,488, Level: 33 Points: 19,488, Level: 33
Activity: 11.0%
Activity: 11.0% Activity: 11.0% Activity: 11.0%
Thanks: Gave 1,658, Got 3,425
Posts: 15,600
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevandalice View Post
People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot
How do you know they just can't pronounce "texts" properly?
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:19 PM   #15
Prominent Member
 
Ned Senior's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stalag 9
Experience Points:
13,490, Level: 27
Points: 13,490, Level: 27 Points: 13,490, Level: 27 Points: 13,490, Level: 27
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 559, Got 264
Posts: 3,200
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevandalice View Post
People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot
You been listening to Radio 1 extra????
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:42 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
eric pisch's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Experience Points:
4,331, Level: 15
Points: 4,331, Level: 15 Points: 4,331, Level: 15 Points: 4,331, Level: 15
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Blog Entries: 9
Thanks: Gave 1,120, Got 772
Posts: 7,380
Re: Grammatical question

i normally say text'd instead of texted which does sound daft

but text is a totally valid verb in my books and can be used in relation to the act of sending a text message
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 1:50 PM   #17
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Experience Points:
2,737, Level: 12
Points: 2,737, Level: 12 Points: 2,737, Level: 12 Points: 2,737, Level: 12
Activity: 0.7%
Activity: 0.7% Activity: 0.7% Activity: 0.7%
Thanks: Gave 62, Got 73
Posts: 479
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevandalice View Post
People who say the plural of text as 'textses' instead of texts should be shot
Isn't that where George Bush comes from?

In a similar vein, what's the plural of (computer) mouse? Mice just doesn't seem right somehow.

Dave
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 1:56 PM   #18
Moderator
 
Iccz's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Keystone City
Experience Points:
29,888, Level: 42
Points: 29,888, Level: 42 Points: 29,888, Level: 42 Points: 29,888, Level: 42
Activity: 24.2%
Activity: 24.2% Activity: 24.2% Activity: 24.2%
Thanks: Gave 3,753, Got 4,287
Posts: 19,785
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Weystoner View Post
Isn't that where George Bush comes from?

In a similar vein, what's the plural of (computer) mouse? Mice just doesn't seem right somehow.

Dave
Surely Mice is the plural regardless of the context the word is used.
Sounds fine to me
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 1:56 PM   #19
Moderator
 
Steven's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Experience Points:
61,727, Level: 60
Points: 61,727, Level: 60 Points: 61,727, Level: 60 Points: 61,727, Level: 60
Activity: 37.9%
Activity: 37.9% Activity: 37.9% Activity: 37.9%
Blog Entries: 42
Thanks: Gave 2,014, Got 4,411
Posts: 32,406
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Weystoner View Post
In a similar vein, what's the plural of (computer) mouse? Mice just doesn't seem right somehow.
If the plural of mouse is not mice then what would it be?
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 2:05 PM   #20
Illustrious Mumbler
 
Mr Incredible's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Fylde Coast
Experience Points:
19,488, Level: 33
Points: 19,488, Level: 33 Points: 19,488, Level: 33 Points: 19,488, Level: 33
Activity: 11.0%
Activity: 11.0% Activity: 11.0% Activity: 11.0%
Thanks: Gave 1,658, Got 3,425
Posts: 15,600
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by LFC_SL View Post
If the plural of mouse is not mice then what would it be?
According to Mr Jinks in Pixie and Dixie, it's meeces.
  Quote
Thanks from:
Orson (07-03-2009)
Old 07-03-2009, 2:11 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
C225's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Linlithgow Nr Edinburgh
Experience Points:
16,359, Level: 30
Points: 16,359, Level: 30 Points: 16,359, Level: 30 Points: 16,359, Level: 30
Activity: 0.4%
Activity: 0.4% Activity: 0.4% Activity: 0.4%
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: Gave 134, Got 654
Posts: 5,840
Re: Grammatical question

One thing i've wondered is why if the plural of mouse is mice then why is the plural of house not hice?
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 2:40 PM   #22
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Experience Points:
2,737, Level: 12
Points: 2,737, Level: 12 Points: 2,737, Level: 12 Points: 2,737, Level: 12
Activity: 0.7%
Activity: 0.7% Activity: 0.7% Activity: 0.7%
Thanks: Gave 62, Got 73
Posts: 479
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by C225 View Post
One thing i've wondered is why if the plural of mouse is mice then why is the plural of house not hice?
Because hice is just a posh way of saying house, silly.

OK, I give in on the mice thing; or I may revert to 'tactile human-computer input devices'.

Dave
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 2:58 PM   #23
Moderator
 
Iccz's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Keystone City
Experience Points:
29,888, Level: 42
Points: 29,888, Level: 42 Points: 29,888, Level: 42 Points: 29,888, Level: 42
Activity: 24.2%
Activity: 24.2% Activity: 24.2% Activity: 24.2%
Thanks: Gave 3,753, Got 4,287
Posts: 19,785
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Weystoner View Post
Isn't that where George Bush comes from?

In a similar vein, what's the plural of (computer) mouse? Mice just doesn't seem right somehow.

Dave
If you really want to be pedantic you could say "Pointing Devices"

If you use MOUSE as an acronym:
Manually Operated User Selection Equipment
I guess you technically could use Mouses, or for the grammar pedants MOUSEs

Quote:
Originally Posted by C225 View Post
One thing i've wondered is why if the plural of mouse is mice then why is the plural of house not hice?
I think it's because when you say houses you say the first s as a z, houzes, so it would probably be acceptable to say mouzes, but... that just doesn't sound right.

Hice sounds awfully German too

Last edited by Iccz; 07-03-2009 at 3:02 PM.
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 6:18 PM   #24
Prominent Member
 
Toasty's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Staffs
Experience Points:
11,027, Level: 25
Points: 11,027, Level: 25 Points: 11,027, Level: 25 Points: 11,027, Level: 25
Activity: 12.9%
Activity: 12.9% Activity: 12.9% Activity: 12.9%
Thanks: Gave 342, Got 375
Posts: 4,924
Re: Grammatical question

This isn't any different to email:

I emailed you earlier, I will email you later..

I guess, I sent you an email earlier, I will send you an email later, sounds a bit better, but hey, why be verbose?
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 9:08 PM   #25
Prominent Member
 
Ned Senior's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stalag 9
Experience Points:
13,490, Level: 27
Points: 13,490, Level: 27 Points: 13,490, Level: 27 Points: 13,490, Level: 27
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 559, Got 264
Posts: 3,200
Re: Grammatical question

Funny I have today been surveying the Hice and Grinds....

What's the difference between a buffalo and a Bison???


Ye canny wash your hands in a buffalo
  Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 9:18 PM   #26
Illustrious Mumbler
 
Mr Incredible's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Fylde Coast
Experience Points:
19,488, Level: 33
Points: 19,488, Level: 33 Points: 19,488, Level: 33 Points: 19,488, Level: 33
Activity: 11.0%
Activity: 11.0% Activity: 11.0% Activity: 11.0%
Thanks: Gave 1,658, Got 3,425
Posts: 15,600
Re: Grammatical question

Everything for the Hice...

YouTube - The Two Ronnies - 1984 Christmas Special (Part 1 of 6)

Skip past the intro to get to the sketch.
  Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 5:31 AM   #27
Prominent Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: West Lothian
Experience Points:
10,158, Level: 24
Points: 10,158, Level: 24 Points: 10,158, Level: 24 Points: 10,158, Level: 24
Activity: 29.2%
Activity: 29.2% Activity: 29.2% Activity: 29.2%
Thanks: Gave 1,120, Got 483
Posts: 4,050
Re: Grammatical question

What I don't understand (or at least, what I think sounds pretty awkward) is saying fitted.

Y'know like - the window fitted in the window frame. Surely the window fat in the window frame? You didn't sitted on the seat you sat on the seat...

English is a weird language like.
  Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 8:17 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
eric pisch's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Experience Points:
4,331, Level: 15
Points: 4,331, Level: 15 Points: 4,331, Level: 15 Points: 4,331, Level: 15
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Blog Entries: 9
Thanks: Gave 1,120, Got 772
Posts: 7,380
Re: Grammatical question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Incredible View Post
Everything for the Hice...

YouTube - The Two Ronnies - 1984 Christmas Special (Part 1 of 6)

Skip past the intro to get to the sketch.


YouTube - The two ronnies - Fork handles
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off