Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian J Yandros - can we keep this one on topic please rather than going over old ground yet again |
With respect Ian, I was keeping it pretty much on topic. The OP was puzzled as to why we're suffering, despite being in a better position than most. I would say that this is an incorrect starting assumption. We are actually very exposed due to the housing bubble, lack of gold reserves and high national debt. Most of THAT is as a result of politicions looking no further than the next opinion poll, and city types desperately trying to cover up the fact that they're building castles in the air.
A newsnight special report on the subprime crisis last year had an interview with a Morgan Stanley wizzkid who admitted that their mathematical models couldn't predict what was about to happen because "they are based on the assumption that house prices can only go up"

.
Like Iceland, we have precious little manufacturing, and have encouraged a banking sector that has outgrown the goverment's ability to control or support it.
To quote Warren Buffet "when the tide goes out, you discover who's been swimming naked". Gordon "no more boom and bust" Brown and half the City have got no trunks on. His 'golden rule' of balancing the budget over the economic cycle appears to have been based on an assumption that we couldn't possibly have a recession as part of the cycle...what sort of economic cycle only goes up?

As soon as things go pear shaped, the golden rule has gone out of the window.
Had we regulated the idiots in the city better, not built up the debts in boom times, and not created a debt bubble to support the econony in 2001, we might've had a chance, and had a less serious downturn back then. Going back further, we're also seeing payback time for Maggie destroying the manufacturing base making us too reliant on the financial sector, and Major for relaxing mortgage and landlord regulation - leading to the rise of Buy to Let speculators.