 | | |
19-12-2007, 10:15 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Deep in the bowels of sussex where the angloargies live
Posts: 3,310
Thanks: Gave 1,043, Got 536 | Has privatization been largely a con?
Looking at my water and gas /leccy bills it seems pretty obvious it has been  . Since privatisation my water bill has shot up from £80 pa to nigh on £400??? Infrastructure investment? For sure but that could have been done when it was under public control thus avoiding paying huge dividends out and over the top salaries to directors.
gas/ leccy= I am paying £150 pm . Twenty years ago I was paying that for my winter gas QUARTER bill ( leccy was about £80). Normal yearly inflation cannot account for all that increase.We have been ripped off!When I first switched over to my current provider 5 years ago they were the cheapest at 80 pm In that time they have almost doubled their rates and are now the dearest. Changing to the cheapest means a saving of £20 pm if I am lucky.
The Government of the day said it would be cheaper , they said there would be more choice, they said it would be more efficient. Ha bloody ha!Whats the point of choice if its all a rip off??In the old days things were nice and simple . You had one gas and one leccy provider and you bill covered all your energy requirements company overheads and whatever invetsment was needed.Now you are having to pay for massive Directors salary bonus schemes and ever increasing shareholder divis as well. WHAT IS THE POINT??The onl;y reason the Government privatised it wasnt to do us a favour but to take it off their hands and pursue a madcap ideology called Thatcherism.
And thoie who think I never criticise this Government. I do for, continuing this thatcherite balderdash. PFIs set up by them . We shall be paying for them for generations to come.
The private sector is all about profit first and not service- thats secondary
__________________ Hail the south , where civilisation begins! |
| |
19-12-2007, 10:19 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: France
Posts: 927
Thanks: Gave 336, Got 331 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con?
Ahh, the Postmans just been and forgotten to deliver any cards, but didn't forget the bills.
|
| |
19-12-2007, 10:30 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Deep in the bowels of sussex where the angloargies live
Posts: 3,310
Thanks: Gave 1,043, Got 536 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con? Quote:
Originally Posted by johntheexpat Ahh, the Postmans just been and forgotten to deliver any cards, but didn't forget the bills. | Direct Debit
__________________ Hail the south , where civilisation begins! |
| |
19-12-2007, 10:40 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 219
Thanks: Gave 15, Got 10 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con?
I keep thinking along the same lines. Nothing seems to work anymore. Think of the things that should just work: NHS, Postal service, telephone... to name but a few. Everytihng is going to pot.
My favourite is the idea of privatising the prison and probation services... how much of a joke is that?
I want to leave this country, it's going down the pan rapidly (if it hasn't already been flushed).
|
| |
19-12-2007, 10:40 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: S Wales
Posts: 486
Thanks: Gave 100, Got 162 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con? Quote:
Originally Posted by la gran siete Looking at my water and gas /leccy bills it seems pretty obvious it has been  . Since privatisation my water bill has shot up from £80 pa to nigh on £400??? Infrastructure investment? For sure but that could have been done when it was under public control thus avoiding paying huge dividends out and over the top salaries to directors.
gas/ leccy= I am paying £150 pm . Twenty years ago I was paying that for my winter gas QUARTER bill ( leccy was about £80). Normal yearly inflation cannot account for all that increase.We have been ripped off!When I first switched over to my current provider 5 years ago they were the cheapest at 80 pm In that time they have almost doubled their rates and are now the dearest. Changing to the cheapest means a saving of £20 pm if I am lucky.
The Government of the day said it would be cheaper , they said there would be more choice, they said it would be more efficient. Ha bloody ha!Whats the point of choice if its all a rip off??In the old days things were nice and simple . You had one gas and one leccy provider and you bill covered all your energy requirements company overheads and whatever invetsment was needed.Now you are having to pay for massive Directors salary bonus schemes and ever increasing shareholder divis as well. WHAT IS THE POINT??The onl;y reason the Government privatised it wasnt to do us a favour but to take it off their hands and pursue a madcap ideology called Thatcherism.
And thoie who think I never criticise this Government. I do for, continuing this thatcherite balderdash. PFIs set up by them . We shall be paying for them for generations to come.
The private sector is all about profit first and not service- thats secondary  | Every word -spot on. Without mentioning the dog's breakfast that is our Rail "service"
__________________ There are two rules for success: 1) Never tell everything you know |
| |
19-12-2007, 10:51 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire!
Posts: 5,360
Thanks: Gave 2,737, Got 1,005 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con?
Hi,
I totally agree with all of you on this issue!  There's not a single "privatised" service that has actually improved, when it wasn't a public service beforehand.
It wasn't that long ago, when if you needed a service, you knew exactly where to go, or who to get in touch with. If it was electric, you phoned your local electric company. For gas, the local gas supplier. Need a telephone, just call BT. Want internet, you looked in a computer/internet magazine, and looked for the one who gave the best price with the best service. (None of this arsing about, as to whether or not you're near to an exchange or not, or whether your area has got the right cabling available.)
Now, you get your electric from the gas company, the internet from the post office, and your phone from the electric company! It's totally farcical!  Each time something gets privatised, the only loosers are the great British public!
Any government who decides to re-nationalise any of these "public" services, would almost certainly get my vote.
Pooch
|
| |
19-12-2007, 11:01 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,577
Thanks: Gave 195, Got 196 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con?
Telecoms are cheaper than they have ever been - when you think you can call the US or Australia for not much more than calling your Gran down the street.
As for the other utilities? Water is the worst as you have no choice over your supplier.
yes gas and leccy are much more expensive than 10 years ago... but we have seen massive wholesale increases in energy prices to which the UK is basically hostage to.
If we had good old nuke power in abundance (like the French) our electricity would be a damn sight cheaper. As it is we rely on proucing electric from imported gas and coal, so we're at the mercy of OPEC and the Russians
__________________ ----------------------------------------------------------
With no fences or walls on the Internet, who needs Gates and Windows? Me, I'm just a lawnmower - you can tell me by the way I walk. |
| |
19-12-2007, 11:17 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Cheshire
Posts: 115
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 10 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con?
Most of you who post on this forum do not remember what the country was like in 1979 before Mrs Thatcher came to power, it was run basically by the unions who held the country to ransom. If she had not implemented reforms we would by now have a third rate economy lower than Italy & Spain. As for privatisation I for one would not want to go back to the "good old days" when you waited up to 6 months to get a phone line installed or had to have a party line.
|
| |
19-12-2007, 11:25 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: France
Posts: 927
Thanks: Gave 336, Got 331 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con? Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Lamle If we had good old nuke power in abundance (like the French) our electricity would be a damn sight cheaper. As it is we rely on proucing electric from imported gas and coal, so we're at the mercy of OPEC and the Russians  | Some French numbers to mull over:
I pay a standing charge of 13.83€ per month for a maximum 9KW draw. A higher maximum incurs a higher charge and lower max, incurs less. (+VAT @ 5.5%)
I basically have economy 7, roughly 5.5 cheap hours overnight and 1.5 at lunchtime.
Cheap leccy is 0.0463€/KWh +VAT@19.60% = 0.0554€
Less cheap leccy is .0787€ + VAT = 0.0941 €
=
The current exchange rate is £1 = 1.39€ so:
Cheap = (near as dammit) 4p per KWh
Less cheap = (n.a.d) 6.8p per KWh
(Geeky stuff, 'cos its all on the bill:
Nuclear is 85.7% of the total, renewable is 5.9% (hydroelectric is 5%), coal 3.3%, 3.2% is gas, 1.6% oil and others 0.3%.)
And finally EDF broke a record during the week, when supply reached a fraction under 89,000MW at 19:00 one evening
Last edited by johntheexpat; 19-12-2007 at 11:35 AM.
Reason: adding bits.
|
| |
19-12-2007, 11:28 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: Gave 98, Got 120 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con?
Lets be honest, privatisation is a bit rubbish!
__________________
Xbox Gamertag: Simbolini, flickr - Photography
Nikon D200 + battery Mount, Nikon AF-S 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED DX, Metz 58 AF1, 2 X Leica R6 + Array of Lenses. |
| |
19-12-2007, 11:35 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: oop north.
Posts: 3,328
Thanks: Gave 596, Got 630 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con?
Privatisation was a big joke...on us. So now we get held to ransom every quarter.
__________________ I'm not crazy cos I take the right pills...every day! Eve Online name: Zillazuki |
| |
19-12-2007, 11:35 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Deep in the bowels of sussex where the angloargies live
Posts: 3,310
Thanks: Gave 1,043, Got 536 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con? Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Westy Most of you who post on this forum do not remember what the country was like in 1979 before Mrs Thatcher came to power, it was run basically by the unions who held the country to ransom. If she had not implemented reforms we would by now have a third rate economy lower than Italy & Spain. . | thats what the media would have us believe but Union unrest was a symptom rather than the disease itself. What really caused our problems was poor management poor leadership and lack of investment
__________________ Hail the south , where civilisation begins! |
| |
19-12-2007, 12:37 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,428
Thanks: Gave 138, Got 252 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con? Quote:
Originally Posted by la gran siete thats what the media would have us believe but Union unrest was a symptom rather than the disease itself. What really caused our problems was poor management poor leadership and lack of investment | Unfortunately the only people who are worse at efficiently running an operation than greedy capitalists are civil servants. That's why stuff was privatised and much of it is cheaper in real terms than it was ten or twenty years ago.
I would have preferred to see ownership of assets that are effective monopolies (such as distibution of gas, electric water and local phone) kept public with the management of those assets being let out to tender.
So I would still own a share of, say, the national gas pipeline network, and would ask firms to tender for its upkeep and maintenance every so many years.
__________________ All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. attributed to Edmund Burke.
Philips 37PF9830, Denon AVR4306, Panasonic NV-HD660B, Philips N1700, Xbox360, Technics SP25, Sony CDP-CX450, Sony CDP-CX455, SkyHD, Nokia N95 8GB
|
| |
19-12-2007, 12:40 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,172
Thanks: Gave 116, Got 84 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con? Quote:
Originally Posted by la gran siete madcap ideology called Thatcherism. | This Madcap ideology got Britain out of some serious decline and actually made the country competitive. Quote:
Originally Posted by la gran siete
And thoie who think I never criticise this Government. I do for, continuing this thatcherite balderdash. | The only good thing about Labour. They actually kept a lot of the good things the Tories had implemented and tried to put a more caring spin on things. Quote:
Originally Posted by la gran siete
The private sector is all about profit first and not service- thats secondary  | Exactly. The way things should be. Profit makes us all stonger, as does competion. You cannot artificially create jobs and wealth. The era of Keynes is well behind us. Adam Smith is again to be shown to be right.
To go back to the times of Benn, Foot and their ilk would be truly frightening. An uncompetive country, ruled by Unions
__________________ Panasonic 42PX600 Sky HD  Toshiba HD-DVD XE1 Marantz 5300 amp Moudaunt Short 906i, 905i, 309i Sub. Tannoy surrounds. X-Box 360 | Go Cows | | |
| |
19-12-2007, 12:42 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,428
Thanks: Gave 138, Got 252 | Re: Has privatization been largely a con? Quote:
Originally Posted by city fan This Madcap ideology got Britain out of some serious decline and actually made the country competitive. | Competitive at what?
__________________ All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. attributed to Edmund Burke.
Philips 37PF9830, Denon AVR4306, Panasonic NV-HD660B, Philips N1700, Xbox360, Technics SP25, Sony CDP-CX450, Sony CDP-CX455, SkyHD, Nokia N95 8GB
|
| | | |