Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules For activity based learning to work well, it requires an enormous amount of preparation and very little facilitation. You need to produce 4x as much material to satisfy different learning styles and give everyone a chance to learn in a way that works for them.
At first I hated it because I felt less in control and it made the sessions less active for me. But it really works... providing you put the effort into your preparation and materials.
I find Powerpoint actually quite useful for subliminal messages... just leave an informative screenshow running on a loop in the background. Some of the group will be drawn in by it, others will be drawn in by solving a puzzle or soemthing else.
It's all about creating choice.
Now I don't claim to be the worlds greatest trainer, and some of my colleagues are far more 'gifted' than I am infront of an audience. But they don't all put in the required effort before hand, and the results speak for themselves.
Just my 2p worth. |
Nice!

the subtle insinuation being I don't prepare properly so it doesn't work? Sorry, not wearing that.

I put in as much prep to all my methods of teaching, and take pride in my work. I have always done well in inspections/observations because of that.
Activity based learning does
not work with all classes and all situations.
I will give two examples as a learner.
Positive:- When I did my 730-7 the course was primarily activity based and it worked a treat. I throughly enjoyed it and so did the rest of the group.
Negative:- When I did my Cert ed they tried to do that entirely activity based. Same tutors, same level of input (they are an excellent, hard working team who aimed to satisfy as many learning styles as possible) but it
didn't work. We
all hated it. Not one person (30 students) came out of that course with a positive thing to say about it. (No-one did in the group prior too, or after ours either. They then went back to teaching it properly.)
These are a good example as the tutors and learning group was the same. As such they are totally comparable.
Activity based learning, like all other types of learning has it's place. It's bad practice however, to suggest it is the 'best' way of learning full stop, and encourage people to take it on as 'given'.
No doubt in a few years time the educationalists will be busy burying it.
Just my 2p worth.