Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Lifestyle Topics > General Chat

Latest AVForums Movie Reviews
Gray Lady Down - Original Motion Picture Soundtrack CD ReviewUp Blu-ray ReviewLéon Blu-ray ReviewNear Dark Blu-ray ReviewLogan's Run Blu-ray Review
Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, The Blu-ray ReviewStar Trek Blu-ray ReviewUFC 100: Lesnar vs. Mir (2009) Blu-ray ReviewThe New York Ripper Blu-ray ReviewHeat Blu-ray Review


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2006, 11:32 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr Jason B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: Gave 21, Got 117
Tax the Fat

I know this is about a tv program,but thought it would be better suited to general chat....

Did anyone see this program on More 4 last night?I thought it was excellent,and although a lot of it was slightly tongue in cheek I found myself agreeing with nearly everything the presenter was saying.

I was shocked at the amount of money severely obese people cost the governemt/us a year

TAX THE FAT
__________________
There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
Trasform-Prohibition has done enough damage.It is time for change.
Mr Jason B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 11:52 AM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 114
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 10
Although I did not see the programme, I read the article on it and do think it is bit extreme to think of taxing the fat, however one thing that does annoy me is being charged excess baggage on a flight. Where weight is obviously of concern then surely price should come into it and the passenger and their luggage should be weighed together to determine any excess charge.
Alan Westy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 11:53 AM   #3 (permalink)
Ex Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 143
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 3
Totally wrong imo, cherry picking at its worst, we see it in education and insurance a lot. Writing people off for not being perfect is not on.

I'm a non smoker and 12 stone/ 5 ' 8" btw
Fluke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 12:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Emulous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 642
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 52
Its not about being perfect its about taking pride, looking after yourself and living a healthy life.

Being obese is about being lazy and if poor health isnt motivation enough then maybe hitting them in the wallets will do something cause Im damn sure something needs to be done.
Emulous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 12:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Mindcrime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Toronto via Birkenhead, UK
Posts: 468
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 28
So, you take more money off the obese which means they can't afford to buy fresh healthy food which in turn means they start to eat cheaper and less healthy pre-packaged meals which in turn makes them larger nice plan! Don't forget it tends to be the poorer end of the population scale that are obese so to make them poorer will just worsen their health and put an even greater strain on the health system.
__________________
Nikon D50, Nikkor 18-55mm & 55-200mm, Sigma 70-300mm DG lens. 60mm f/2.8 macro Nikkor lens, Velbon 550R Sherpa.
Noli nothis permittere te terere

Last edited by Mindcrime; 07-06-2006 at 12:12 PM.
Mindcrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 12:19 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 123
Thanks: Gave 36, Got 12
me and my girlfriend had a chat about this last night and both felt the programme was suitably unjustified.

why just tax the fat for the issues they cause, why not tax drug addicts, alcoholics, smokers, people with eating disorders, disabled people the list goes on and on, i'm not saying any of it's right or wrong, but i felt the programme was making an example of an easy target.
James Ferrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 12:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Ethics Gradient's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: aka Billy Science - Suni ojna Tas
Posts: 492
Thanks: Gave 34, Got 360
Totally agree, we should put them in prison tbh - and anyone esle with deviant lifestyles that don't match our own. If they can't be fit and healthy then they deserve to be punished. Maybe we could clone Adolf Hitler and put him incharge to sort of these fat obsenities that are such a burden on our society - he sure new how to deal with 'different' people.



......... or maybe some of you posting here should have a SERIOUS think about exactly what you are saying !

Some people are born with genetic disorders or get diseases that mean they struggle with weight issues.
Some people don't want to live a rigid health regime lifestyle.
Some people are born with genes that mean they are perfectly health yet 7ft tall and 24st .... do you think we should charge them money ?

or is it purely an issue of lifestyle choice ? - well lets not accept peoples relegious holidays, or treat people with sports injuries, or anyone thats ever drunk alcohol.

Maybe we should all be perfect just like you, wouldn't the world be such a perfect place .............
__________________
In the words of Marcel Proust - and this applies to any woman in the world - if you can stay up and listen with a fair degree of attention to whatever garbage, no matter how stupid it is that they're coming out with, til ten minutes past four in the morning... you're in.
Ethics Gradient is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks from:
Alan_W (08-06-2006), Carl Stock (11-06-2006), gus607 (07-06-2006), James Ferrier (07-06-2006), Jenn (07-06-2006), Miniholic (07-06-2006), Most_Wanted (08-06-2006), Ultima (07-06-2006), waring192 (08-08-2008), William123 (10-06-2006)
Old 07-06-2006, 12:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 442
Thanks: Gave 33, Got 36
Why not just have a higher tax for the unhealthy foods?

Each product has to be submitted for an assessment before it goes on sale that determins the level of tax it will attract. Fresh fruit and veg starts at 0% and fast food burgers are say 20%.

-Neil
neilneil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 12:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
Ex Member
 
Mr Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Weardale
Posts: 1,301
Thanks: Gave 21, Got 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Westy
Where weight is obviously of concern then surely price should come into it and the passenger and their luggage should be weighed together to determine any excess charge.
would be a bit embarrassing wouldn't you not think..??
Mr Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 12:42 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
shodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: shoeburyness
Posts: 1,363
Thanks: Gave 59, Got 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Ferrier
me and my girlfriend had a chat about this last night and both felt the programme was suitably unjustified.

why just tax the fat for the issues they cause, why not tax drug addicts, alcoholics, smokers, people with eating disorders, disabled people the list goes on and on.
Absolutely right, we should be taxing them extra...
__________________
Can't think of anything funny to say...
shodan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 12:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
shahedz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,309
Thanks: Gave 788, Got 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by shodan
Absolutely right, we should be taxing them extra...
have you seen the TAX on cigarettes? they are taxed more, i think its ridiculous to tax obese people more, what next tax cancer sufferers more?
__________________
Linn Kolektor pre amp & LK140 amp,Genki,Sony MD MDS JE510,Sonos ZP80 + CR100,Ariston RD-40 turntable,TDL RTL3 ,Samsung32R87, Yamaha YSP-1000,Panasonic PT-AX100E projector,Toshiba HD-E1 ,Sky HD, PS3,Harmony 885
shahedz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 1:00 PM   #12 (permalink)
Ex Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,557
Thanks: Gave 69, Got 316
Tax the fat ? I knew John Prescott would find a department for himself sooner or later
Nick_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 1:03 PM   #13 (permalink)
Ex Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 143
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 3
This reminds me of a conversation I was having with my quite overweight sister in law who got all judgemental on smokers - saying that they shouldnt even be given jobs due to their disgusting habit (I'm an ex-smoker and she knows it). I then pointed out that pehaps fat people shouldnt be given jobs due to their disgusting sugar and fat addiction and how they are a burden on society.

She shut up then.
Fluke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 1:05 PM   #14 (permalink)
Ex Member
 
Mr Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Weardale
Posts: 1,301
Thanks: Gave 21, Got 66
they should tax unhealthy foods and stamp down on food companies who mislead consumers by packaging their food as healthy when it's now - especially when they say thing like 85% fat free (meaning it contains 15% fat!) and the amount of sugar in them too!!

even worse is shops like adsa (they seem to be the main culprit) as when they advertise offers on tv - it's always for the unhealthy processed sh*te...
Mr Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks from:
gus607 (07-06-2006)
Old 07-06-2006, 1:05 PM   #15 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
overkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murkeyside
Posts: 4,433
Thanks: Gave 228, Got 548
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Sumner
Why not just have a higher tax for the unhealthy foods?

Each product has to be submitted for an assessment before it goes on sale that determins the level of tax it will attract. Fresh fruit and veg starts at 0% and fast food burgers are say 20%.

-Neil
Sounds good Neil. One of the reasons people don't eat healthily is because quality fruit and veg is so expensive when compared to it's ready made, junk food equivalent.

I would love to eat fresh fruit and cook with fresh veg every day, but sadly my wallet disagrees! If you go on a diet you would think your food bill would go down, but every time we do it rockets. This is purely down to the fact you eat more fresh food (except Atkins).

EG, you broke the 'don't mention the small Austrian rule' - but you made a good point.
__________________
"Someone recently said to me, there's a lot of nutters out there" "Then i saw the ABD website and realised they were right!!!"

"Yes, he's back, i've no idea why, and nobody cares anyway........."
overkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks from:
Jenn (07-06-2006)



Bookmarks

Tags
fat, tax
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:13 AM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting