AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

Think retiring at 67 is bad? :eek:

Post Reply
Old 19-02-2006, 12:57 PM   #1
Distinguished Member
 
Miyazaki's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hants
Experience Points:
49,918, Level: 54
Points: 49,918, Level: 54 Points: 49,918, Level: 54 Points: 49,918, Level: 54
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 709, Got 869
Posts: 14,193
Think retiring at 67 is bad? :eek:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4726300.stm

This will affect my generation as in 2050 I will be 70, looking forward to another 15 years in work!
  Quote
Old 19-02-2006, 1:12 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
vonhosen's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Experience Points:
5,917, Level: 18
Points: 5,917, Level: 18 Points: 5,917, Level: 18 Points: 5,917, Level: 18
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 17
Posts: 1,840
Not for all of us though. Some will have made decisions that mean they will finish working much earlier than that.
  Quote
Old 19-02-2006, 1:51 PM   #3
Preeminent Member
 
Razor's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Experience Points:
88,750, Level: 72
Points: 88,750, Level: 72 Points: 88,750, Level: 72 Points: 88,750, Level: 72
Activity: 57.6%
Activity: 57.6% Activity: 57.6% Activity: 57.6%
Thanks: Gave 2,109, Got 3,668
Posts: 30,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonhosen
Not for all of us though. Some will have made decisions that mean they will finish working much earlier than that.

I'll second that. I am hoping for a nice early retirement. Well thats the plan.
  Quote
Old 19-02-2006, 2:31 PM   #4
Distinguished Member
 
Miyazaki's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hants
Experience Points:
49,918, Level: 54
Points: 49,918, Level: 54 Points: 49,918, Level: 54 Points: 49,918, Level: 54
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 709, Got 869
Posts: 14,193
Trouble with teaching is you need to be in for a long time before receiving a final salary pension.

22 years I think it is. Someone told me that you live for 15 years on average if you retire at 60, and only 6 months on average if you retire at 65 I don't know what element of truth there is in that, but it was sobering to hear!
  Quote
Old 19-02-2006, 3:18 PM   #5
shadowritten
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Games Guru
Trouble with teaching is you need to be in for a long time before receiving a final salary pension.

22 years I think it is. Someone told me that you live for 15 years on average if you retire at 60, and only 6 months on average if you retire at 65 I don't know what element of truth there is in that, but it was sobering to hear!
Not sure how true that is, actually. I know/knew a lot of oldies who retired at 65 and made it comfortably into their 80s and 90s.
  Quote
Old 19-02-2006, 3:41 PM   #6
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Beverley, East Yorkshire
Experience Points:
6,748, Level: 19
Points: 6,748, Level: 19 Points: 6,748, Level: 19 Points: 6,748, Level: 19
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 203, Got 225
Posts: 3,791
sod it... I'm retiring at 35 then.


I think there may be just a little bit of BS in what you've heard there mate, I wouldn't pay too much attention.


Life expectancy will be well into treble figures by 2040 anyway... as you can't pay your taxes when you're dead.
  Quote
Old 19-02-2006, 4:53 PM   #7
mjn mjn is offline
Distinguished Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Herts, England
Experience Points:
18,259, Level: 32
Points: 18,259, Level: 32 Points: 18,259, Level: 32 Points: 18,259, Level: 32
Activity: 4.5%
Activity: 4.5% Activity: 4.5% Activity: 4.5%
Thanks: Gave 217, Got 610
Posts: 11,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowritten
Not sure how true that is, actually. I know/knew a lot of oldies who retired at 65 and made it comfortably into their 80s and 90s.
Who actually wants to live to they're 80+....having to have people dress you, wipe your ass, etc etc
  Quote
Old 19-02-2006, 6:16 PM   #8
shadowritten
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjn
Who actually wants to live to they're 80+....having to have people dress you, wipe your ass, etc etc
I've always thought I'll die at 87. Anything beyond that is a bonus.
  Quote
Old 19-02-2006, 6:50 PM   #9
Distinguished Member
 
Miyazaki's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hants
Experience Points:
49,918, Level: 54
Points: 49,918, Level: 54 Points: 49,918, Level: 54 Points: 49,918, Level: 54
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 709, Got 869
Posts: 14,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjn
Who actually wants to live to they're 80+....having to have people dress you, wipe your ass, etc etc
The age thing is relative. You would be in a similar physical condition in 2050 aged 85 as you would be now aged 65.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 9:32 AM   #10
Ex Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Experience Points:
29,695, Level: 42
Points: 29,695, Level: 42 Points: 29,695, Level: 42 Points: 29,695, Level: 42
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 69, Got 316
Posts: 9,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Games Guru
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4726300.stm

This will affect my generation as in 2050 I will be 70, looking forward to another 15 years in work!
Ha ha.... at the rate that Blair is going, you'll retire at 150 by 2050

He's already moved the goal posts twice, if I recall correctly.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 9:45 AM   #11
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Experience Points:
3,353, Level: 13
Points: 3,353, Level: 13 Points: 3,353, Level: 13 Points: 3,353, Level: 13
Activity: 0.5%
Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5%
Thanks: Gave 426, Got 42
Posts: 525
MP's Life Expectancy

Members of Parliament should live well into three figures then, since if you look at Telecasts from the House, many of them appear to be sleeping anyway, apart from during that ridiculous "Donkey Market" of Prime Minister's Question Time, when they all bray---'Hee- Haw Hee- Haw Hee -Haw.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 12:56 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
t-force's Avatar
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Southampton, UK
Experience Points:
8,477, Level: 22
Points: 8,477, Level: 22 Points: 8,477, Level: 22 Points: 8,477, Level: 22
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 54, Got 68
Posts: 1,597
I think if you are in your early-mid 20s currently, thinking that you'd be able to retire - or at least receive state pension- before turning 75 is having one's head in the sand. You've only got to look at population demographics to realise things can't go on as they are. It's either that or bring in National Service for the over 50s, with a compulsory war term - to get rid of the excess before they retire. And yes - that last suggestion is very much made tongue in cheek.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 3:33 PM   #13
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Experience Points:
12,037, Level: 26
Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26
Activity: 2.7%
Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7%
Thanks: Gave 144, Got 241
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_UK
Ha ha.... at the rate that Blair is going, you'll retire at 150 by 2050

He's already moved the goal posts twice, if I recall correctly.
I'd happily work till i'm 150 if i get to live that long

I think that at 23 now, 100 would be the average age by the time i go (when i'm 180 ) does anyone know what the average age was when the oldies where young? (no offence intendented)
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 4:01 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
vonhosen's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Experience Points:
5,917, Level: 18
Points: 5,917, Level: 18 Points: 5,917, Level: 18 Points: 5,917, Level: 18
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 17
Posts: 1,840
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBAS....asp?vlnk=9180
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 5:02 PM   #15
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Experience Points:
12,037, Level: 26
Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26
Activity: 2.7%
Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7%
Thanks: Gave 144, Got 241
Posts: 5,288
They are 1980's and after i was more after say the 1930's-50's.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 5:09 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
vonhosen's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Experience Points:
5,917, Level: 18
Points: 5,917, Level: 18 Points: 5,917, Level: 18 Points: 5,917, Level: 18
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 17
Posts: 1,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazbarber
They are 1980's and after i was more after say the 1930's-50's.

If you look at the year down the side & then look at the current age across the top (for someone born in those year) the result you get is how many years past that year they have left.

ie.
If you are male & managed to make it to 70 years old in year 2000 (therefore born 1930) you can expect on average another 12.3 years.
You wouldn't have had an expectation at birth of living to 82.3 years, but having managed to survive to 70 by year 2000 that's what you could then expect on average.



It could be worse.
Average life expectancy in Sierra Leone is 37.9

Last edited by vonhosen; 20-02-2006 at 5:15 PM.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 5:11 PM   #17
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Experience Points:
12,037, Level: 26
Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26
Activity: 2.7%
Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7%
Thanks: Gave 144, Got 241
Posts: 5,288
Ok thanks I should have maybe looked a little more at the site, my bad.

My point was rather a crude one, of what was the average when the people dying now where my age and then get the difference and add it on to the current average. Not exactly an exact science but a nice gues.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 5:21 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
vonhosen's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Experience Points:
5,917, Level: 18
Points: 5,917, Level: 18 Points: 5,917, Level: 18 Points: 5,917, Level: 18
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 17
Posts: 1,840
If you take the USA
In 1900 at birth it was 47.3 years.
In 1929 it was 57.1
In 1945 it was 65.9
In 1980 it was 73.7.
In 2000 it was 77.4
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 5:22 PM   #19
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Experience Points:
12,037, Level: 26
Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26
Activity: 2.7%
Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7%
Thanks: Gave 144, Got 241
Posts: 5,288
For the more healthy amoung us thats a nice increase a very nice trend.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 6:24 PM   #20
Illustrious Member
 
dejongj's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Whipsnade
Experience Points:
29,874, Level: 42
Points: 29,874, Level: 42 Points: 29,874, Level: 42 Points: 29,874, Level: 42
Activity: 64.8%
Activity: 64.8% Activity: 64.8% Activity: 64.8%
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: Gave 1,012, Got 1,588
Posts: 16,713
Let this be just another warning that you all need to make arrangements for your own pension funds....Besides being able to retire earlier, it's about the best tax break you can get...I mean every £1000 you put in per month will cost you about £500....About the best roi you get anywhere...And with the pending changes to the system and a nice fat pension fund you can even start buying property abroad etc.....

Don't postpone it, start young!
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 8:41 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
mjcairney's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Airdrie, Scotland
Experience Points:
13,032, Level: 27
Points: 13,032, Level: 27 Points: 13,032, Level: 27 Points: 13,032, Level: 27
Activity: 8.3%
Activity: 8.3% Activity: 8.3% Activity: 8.3%
Thanks: Gave 195, Got 525
Posts: 5,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjn
Who actually wants to live to they're 80+....having to have people dress you, wipe your ass, etc etc
Someone who's 79?

Cheers,

Martin.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2006, 10:38 PM   #22
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Experience Points:
12,037, Level: 26
Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26 Points: 12,037, Level: 26
Activity: 2.7%
Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7% Activity: 2.7%
Thanks: Gave 144, Got 241
Posts: 5,288
Not everyonw who is 80 requires that level of care, and if they did with supporting family they can still provide alot of comfort for their family.

Also the family of the 79 year old would probably want them to live till they were 80 (atleast).
  Quote
Old 21-02-2006, 2:01 AM   #23
av2diefor
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjn
Who actually wants to live to they're 80+....having to have people dress you, wipe your ass, etc etc
Well my mother is 85, does her own shopping (and her neighbour's), looks after her own home and is fit as a fiddle.

Wipes her own ass too and would probably Whoop yours
  Quote
Old 21-02-2006, 9:13 AM   #24
Distinguished Member
 
Miyazaki's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hants
Experience Points:
49,918, Level: 54
Points: 49,918, Level: 54 Points: 49,918, Level: 54 Points: 49,918, Level: 54
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 709, Got 869
Posts: 14,193
My gran is 85 and tried to eat her own hearing aid on Sunday and dunking it in her cup of tea!
  Quote
Old 21-02-2006, 9:30 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
Bat-man's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lincoln
Experience Points:
5,839, Level: 18
Points: 5,839, Level: 18 Points: 5,839, Level: 18 Points: 5,839, Level: 18
Activity: 0.8%
Activity: 0.8% Activity: 0.8% Activity: 0.8%
Thanks: Gave 37, Got 139
Posts: 2,303
When I checked my state pension, online, it talked about my contributions to my state pension, yet the Government say that I am contributing to the current older people's pension not my own.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off