First things first, none of you guys have gone to a university or similar institute to study sharia, all of what you are saying is what you hear on the news.
Sharia means law. To refer to it as Sharia law is like saying law law, Sharia is basically to do with formulating laws based on Quran as the constitution. Sharia can roughly be divided into two parts, the first part constitute all the specific Injunctions found in the Quran (undisputed, infallible word of god) and cannot be revised beyond the inherent limits of these Quranic injunction and these limits have more to do with their implementations than the law itself. The second part must be restricted to laws legislated through a system of direct democracy and must conform to the broader framework of the Quran, these laws are subject to review by the Ummah (people) as opposed to closed review process controlled by religious cabals. Alongside this, I would argue that Sharia law has a judiciary system which accounts the people for there actions and also guarantees justice for all the people in society regardless colour, gender, or race. Now some of the statements you have made in you're thread is completely baseless and has been formulated by people who are feed up with the draconian system of capitalism. You're judiciary system is complete joke, made up of high profile judges who represent the rich class in society and make a mockery out of the poor and the helpless. Take for instance, domestic and rape, which you have not been able to address.
First, let me clear up the misconceptions. Stoning is not explicitly mentioned in the Quran, however capital punishment most certainly is part of sharia.
The uniqueness of sharia is that it deals with the causes of a particular crime rather than the symptoms/consequences. So for instance rather than tackling drink driving, the drinking is banned from the start so as to avoid the crime being committed in the first place, once we understand the methodology behind sharia we understand what its all about. To contrast, the Legal code in Britain allows peadophiles to get away with molestering children and deals with them after the crime/damage has been committed!!!
The capital punishment is put in place so as to act as a deterrent, people do not commit the crime out of fear of the consequences, the success of such a system is only judged by the crime rates, and behold the stats show that the crime rates are much much lower.
It would be useless for me to give a statement without the facts so here are the facts regarding rape,
#1 South Africa: 1.19538 per 1,000 people
#2 Seychelles: 0.788294 per 1,000 people
#3 Australia: 0.777999 per 1,000 people
#4 Montserrat: 0.749384 per 1,000 people
#5 Canada: 0.733089 per 1,000 people
#63 Yemen: 0.0038597 per 1,000 people
#64 Azerbaijan: 0.00379171 per 1,000 people
#65 Saudi Arabia: 0.00329321 per 1,000 people
(for updated stats :
Rapes (per capita) statistics - countries compared - Crime data on NationMaster)
Not to mention the fact that crime rates across the board are much lower simply due to the methodology of tackling the crime in that the cause is targeted and the consequences act as a deterrent.
As for social cohesion, Sharia was the first law passed which did not discriminate against any ethnicity, or religion. This brings me onto social mobility and economics. As we all know the capitalist banking system promotes an ever growing wealth gap between the rich and the poor. In Islam the gold standard is adopted whereby all paper currency is backed by gold. This in turn reduces inflation to a bare minimum;
Heres some economic facts, the ottoman empire had something like 11% inflation in all of its 600 odd year history (off the top of my head) this was mainly determined by the levels of gold and silver available. This combined with the fact that it is an obligation upon Muslims to give 2.5% of their surplus income to charity (in an Islamic state given to the bayt-al-maal ‘the state treasury’ (the worlds first benefits system)). This also means that hoarding is minimised as the hoarder is losing 2.5% annually and the wealth gap is reduced this increasing social cohesion.
If land remains uncultivated for 3 years it is seized by the state in order to utilise it for common interests. There is low taxation on new business’ to promote enterprise: all of these are economic benefits which the west could benefit from to break free from the shackles of debt to the bankers.
Unfortunately however Muslim countries have abandoned their true law and adopted fiat currency thus reducing them to debt slaves; neither do they implement these laws.
It is a shame that most muslim countries do not in fact implement these laws sent down in the quran and sunnah (prophetic tradition) and rather they opt for failing ideologies
As for the cases where you hear of unjustified stoning’s to death, islam does not advocate these, firstly you must read up what is actually justified and why so many modern day politicians have said that sharia is by far the most just judiciary system (look up the german politicians) , in the cases of these stonings it is usually uneducated people living in stateless societies who decide they know best and carry out atrocities which have nothing to do with true sharia.
another thing to point out is that the so called countries which run sharia law do not in fact run true sharia law, they pick and choose fragments, no country has run true sharia under an Islamic state for at least 100 years!