Member Log In

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

charging a monthly fee for having a bank account

Post Reply
Old 01-06-2012, 9:47 PM   #1
Senior Member
shoestring25's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: essex
Thanks: Gave 30, Got 133
Posts: 2,926
charging a monthly fee for having a bank account

it is being suggested that bank accounts will no longer be free in the future and they will start charging a monthly fee say £10 for having a bank account. wondering what people's opinions are on this?

im totally against it because you must have a bank account to get your wages paid into and to pay bills and take money out. there is no alternative to a bank account and as such this idea of charging comes across as a tax.
  Quote
Advert
Log in or sign up to remove
Old 01-06-2012, 9:48 PM   #2
Distinguished Member
dc8900's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 320, Got 2,409
Posts: 12,179
+1, Hope we can still maintain free current accounts
  Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 9:52 PM   #3
Senior Member
THE AMATUER's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Thanks: Gave 162, Got 199
Posts: 2,565
I blame Martin Lewis :-).
  Quote
Thanks from:
Dave (01-06-2012)
Old 01-06-2012, 9:57 PM   #4
Veteran Member
JagoPlasma's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Thanks: Gave 987, Got 462
Posts: 6,595
Not gonna happen. There will always be free bank accounts as people will flock to them. Hell I'd set up my own free banking service!
  Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 10:07 PM   #5
Eminent Member
Join Date: May 2002
Thanks: Gave 478, Got 2,052
Posts: 21,752
They would have to do a minimum balance that the account is over for most of the time. My account is barely more than £50 ever. Any money going in doesn't stay in for long. How can I expect to be charged £10 when there would be so little in the account.
  Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 10:13 PM   #6
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Thanks: Gave 669, Got 558
Posts: 5,935
Maybe they'll only accept customers who have sufficient funds to pay the fee.
  Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 11:02 PM   #7
Illustrious Mumbler
Mr Incredible's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Fylde Coast
Thanks: Gave 2,755, Got 6,711
Posts: 19,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by JagoPlasma View Post
Not gonna happen. There will always be free bank accounts as people will flock to them. Hell I'd set up my own free banking service!
Or the banks could charge for the accounts then attract customers by offering better interest on the current accounts.

If anyone thinks their bank account is "free", you're mistaken. The banks make your money work for them!
  Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 11:06 PM   #8
Distinguished Member
dc8900's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 320, Got 2,409
Posts: 12,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Incredible View Post
If anyone thinks their bank account is "free", you're mistaken. The banks make your money work for them!
And yet for some reason I'd rather they do that than charge me £x/month for an account
  Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 11:09 PM   #9
Prominent Member
Miss Mandy's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Essex
Thanks: Gave 296, Got 420
Posts: 3,996
I thought that all banks had to offer a free bank account of some type? I can't see that changing. Even if its just a basic account to allow payments to go in and direct debits to go out.
For me personally being on JSA, there is no way I would be able to afford £10-15 a month to pay for a bank account, but if I haven't got a bank account I can't get my payments or pay my bills. I can't see how charging for all bank accounts would work for people on benefits or on a low income.
  Quote
Thanks from:
GAZBEROTTEN (02-06-2012)
Old 01-06-2012, 11:12 PM   #10
Illustrious Mumbler
Mr Incredible's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Fylde Coast
Thanks: Gave 2,755, Got 6,711
Posts: 19,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc8900 View Post
And yet for some reason I'd rather they do that than charge me £x/month for an account
Probably with you on that one!

But think how much money banks have saved since the advent of internet and online banking. I probably write just one cheque a year now, whereas before I used to go through a book every 6 months or so.
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 2:43 PM   #11
Senior Member
THE AMATUER's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Thanks: Gave 162, Got 199
Posts: 2,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Mandy View Post
I thought that all banks had to offer a free bank account of some type? I can't see that changing. Even if its just a basic account to allow payments to go in and direct debits to go out.
For me personally being on JSA, there is no way I would be able to afford £10-15 a month to pay for a bank account, but if I haven't got a bank account I can't get my payments or pay my bills. I can't see how charging for all bank accounts would work for people on benefits or on a low income.
There are calls for free banking to end.

Momentum gathers to end free banking - Telegraph

Lots of banks are imposing minimum amounts you have to credit to get free banking, First Direct for example charge a £10 monthly fee if you deposit less than £1,500 a month. I notice most of the free accounts now pay zero interest as well and some have withdrawn things like the free overdraft buffer they used to give.

I think its a matter of time before they all charge. Santander are pushing people into their new 123 current account, that has a £2 monthly charge, no doubt that will increase over time.
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 5:32 PM   #12
Prominent Member
Houghsx's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: City 17
Thanks: Gave 1,352, Got 984
Posts: 4,945
So quick question then. What do the banks do with all the money that's in peoples accounts.
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 5:58 PM   #13
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mid Wales
Thanks: Gave 46, Got 69
Posts: 939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Houghsx
So quick question then. What do the banks do with all the money that's in peoples accounts.
Use it to lend to other people
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 7:03 PM   #14
Prominent Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kent
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: Gave 208, Got 201
Posts: 3,749
A lot of account have minimum turnover e.g. 500 to have an account
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 7:07 PM   #15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Thanks: Gave 287, Got 105
Posts: 1,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE AMATUER View Post
There are calls for free banking to end.

Momentum gathers to end free banking - Telegraph

Lots of banks are imposing minimum amounts you have to credit to get free banking, First Direct for example charge a £10 monthly fee if you deposit less than £1,500 a month. I notice most of the free accounts now pay zero interest as well and some have withdrawn things like the free overdraft buffer they used to give.

I think its a matter of time before they all charge. Santander are pushing people into their new 123 current account, that has a £2 monthly charge, no doubt that will increase over time.
Id like to look at the positive this will have for those in the post office/newsagent sector and those who refuse to use bank accounts and giros instead. All this will do is make more people use Giros and then the post offices will get record amounts of customers cashing there giros and buying stuff from there branches that have newsagents.

This will result in newsagents with post offices see a massive increase in profits and an increase of jobs in the post office/ newsagents sector

It will also generate more VAT with those who buy Tobacco,Alcohol and any other stuff that has VAT. More money in the coffers and an increase in the amount of newsagent/post office jobs out there will actually benefit this country during times of high unemployment.

If the banks want to charge people to use bank accounts and lose a lot of business and benefit another sector at there expense let them

And other businesses that rely on customers to use direct debit will suffer from this or go bankrupt if this happens which will eventually result in massive job losses in the banking industry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Mandy View Post
I thought that all banks had to offer a free bank account of some type? I can't see that changing. Even if its just a basic account to allow payments to go in and direct debits to go out.
For me personally being on JSA, there is no way I would be able to afford £10-15 a month to pay for a bank account, but if I haven't got a bank account I can't get my payments or pay my bills. I can't see how charging for all bank accounts would work for people on benefits or on a low income.
It wouldn't not everyone can afford to pay £10 -£15 per month. And even then the banks would have to show justification for the charge and what they would be doing with your money. And i dought the banks would survive if there customers closed there accounts down and went with giros.

Last edited by GAZBEROTTEN; 02-06-2012 at 7:13 PM.
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 7:14 PM   #16
Prominent Member
Phil57's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Vale of Evesham
Thanks: Gave 753, Got 406
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAZBEROTTEN View Post
Id like to look at the positive this will have for those in the post office/newsagent sector and those who refuse to use bank accounts and giros instead. All this will do is make more people use Giros and then the post offices will get record amounts of customers cashing there giros and buying stuff from there branches that have newsagents.

This will result in newsagents with post offices see a massive increase in profits and an increase of jobs in the post office/ newsagents sector

It will also generate more VAT with those who buy Tobacco,Alcohol and any other stuff that has VAT. More money in the coffers and an increase in the amount of newsagent/post office jobs out there will actually benefit this country during times of high unemployment.

If the banks want to charge people to use bank accounts and lose a lot of business and benefit another sector at there expense let them

And other businesses that rely on customers to use direct debit will suffer from this or go bankrupt if this happens which will eventually result in massive job losses in the banking industry
.............................and Gaz puts his foot in ........................again!!
  Quote
Thanks from:
krish (03-06-2012)
Old 02-06-2012, 7:26 PM   #17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Thanks: Gave 287, Got 105
Posts: 1,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil57 View Post
.............................and Gaz puts his foot in ........................again!!
Phil i have a simple question for you which i am hopeful you will respond to and be polite.

Why is it a big deal? You where not forced or compelled ,to read,reply to this so whats with the negativity?

Its not like any one has been seriously offended by it. If you don't like my post move on and find something else. Its a difference of opinion only.

Gaz
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 7:26 PM   #18
Conspicuous Member
Desmo's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Braintree, Essex.
Thanks: Gave 580, Got 1,229
Posts: 8,547
Subscribes for more Gaz wisdom.
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 7:35 PM   #19
Prominent Member
Phil57's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Vale of Evesham
Thanks: Gave 753, Got 406
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAZBEROTTEN View Post
Phil i have a simple question for you which i am hopeful you will respond to and be polite.

Why is it a big deal? You where not forced or compelled ,to read,reply to this so whats with the negativity?

Its not like any one has been seriously offended by it. If you don't like my post move on and find something else. Its a difference of opinion only.

Gaz
Do you think before you post?

Selling tobacco and alcohol is positive?
Bankruptcy is positive?
Massive job losses is positive?
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 7:40 PM   #20
Moderator
IronGiant's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford UK
Thanks: Gave 4,228, Got 8,128
Posts: 28,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil57 View Post
Selling alcohol is positive?
Lots of Vodka Alcohol Tax on that
  Quote
Thanks from:
Desmo (02-06-2012), krish (03-06-2012), Phil57 (02-06-2012)
Old 02-06-2012, 9:09 PM   #21
Veteran Member
JagoPlasma's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Thanks: Gave 987, Got 462
Posts: 6,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Incredible View Post
Or the banks could charge for the accounts then attract customers by offering better interest on the current accounts.

If anyone thinks their bank account is "free", you're mistaken. The banks make your money work for them!
I know that probably wasnt aimed at me. but I have never thought that a bank doesnt make money from my money.

My Bank account IS "free", it does not charge me any money for the services it provides me.

In return for
  • Collecting my money from my employer
  • Keeping my money safe
  • Giving me easy access to my money when i want it

My Bank can do whatever it likes with my money as long as I get back what I put in, I don't even expect interest from them!

But if they want to start charging me for this service then they can either Lock my money in a vault and not touch it or I will go to someone who will give me a free account.

Banks have shown for a long time they do not need people to pay for an account. Even Richard Branson had to backtrack on his idea of charging!
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 9:11 PM   #22
Illustrious Mumbler
Mr Incredible's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Fylde Coast
Thanks: Gave 2,755, Got 6,711
Posts: 19,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by JagoPlasma View Post
I know that probably wasnt aimed at me. but I have never thought that a bank doesnt make money from my money.

My Bank account IS "free", it does not charge me any money for the services it provides me.
It was a bit of a tongue in cheek post!
  Quote
Thanks from:
JagoPlasma (02-06-2012)
Old 02-06-2012, 10:41 PM   #23
Distinguished Member
dc8900's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 320, Got 2,409
Posts: 12,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAZBEROTTEN View Post
make more people use Giros and then the post offices will get record amounts of customers cashing there giros and buying stuff from there branches that have newsagents..
Bit of news for you mate, Giros haven't been around for nearly a decade now seeing as Girobank merged with Alliance & Leicester in 2003

Girobank - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:04 PM   #24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Thanks: Gave 214, Got 200
Posts: 1,673
I bank at Coutts and i have always paid for the account.

However, it does offer excellent service and is worth it IMO.
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:17 PM   #25
Prominent Member
Houghsx's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: City 17
Thanks: Gave 1,352, Got 984
Posts: 4,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by dj_padd

Use it to lend to other people
Exactly, they use our money to make themselves money. To pay a charge for them to use our money is a bit of a joke tbh.
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:19 PM   #26
Senior Member
shoestring25's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: essex
Thanks: Gave 30, Got 133
Posts: 2,926
rather than charge you a monthly fee for having an account why dont they charge you per transaction that way they make more the more you use it, and others that dont use it as much dont pay as much. this pay as you go way would make things alot fairer
  Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:37 PM   #27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Thanks: Gave 160, Got 316
Posts: 2,872
I don't like the idea of a charge per transaction, I'd most likely end up using my debit card for getting money out the ATM than pay per transaction.
Personally, I don't envisage 'free' accounts coming to an end, not while the public own a large percentage of 2 of largest banks in the UK.
Although if it did come to an end I'd rather pay a fixed monthly fee than, pay for each transaction.
  Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 8:03 AM   #28
Senior Member
shoestring25's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: essex
Thanks: Gave 30, Got 133
Posts: 2,926
£10 is alot for me considering i make about 7-8 transactions in a month thats why i would rather be charged per transaction . most of my stuff is on credit card which isnt a bank account
  Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 8:52 AM   #29
Conspicuous Member
Desmo's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Braintree, Essex.
Thanks: Gave 580, Got 1,229
Posts: 8,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoestring25
rather than charge you a monthly fee for having an account why dont they charge you per transaction that way they make more the more you use it, and others that dont use it as much dont pay as much. this pay as you go way would make things alot fairer
Just like a business account

Those little fees can soon mount up though
  Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 8:52 AM   #30
Illustrious Member
imightbewrong's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Romford-ish
Thanks: Gave 2,979, Got 3,329
Posts: 19,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Houghsx

Exactly, they use our money to make themselves money. To pay a charge for them to use our money is a bit of a joke tbh.
Not from current accounts really - as the money can go out in an instant - very hard to lend. A bank that only had current accounts would not be able to stay in business - they really need you to take out their other products too.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off