Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadringers Eurgh why do these places think we are all pros who are then going to sell our pictures?
with any kind of equipment that you can carry in your pocket or round your neck you are not going to get brilliant photos of whoever it is on stage when you are on the otherside of the stadium. you would have to be a lot closer and have bigger lenses that is a little more than you can just hang round your neck for anything worth selling.
I'll upload some of my pictures of the Federer / Murray match later on and show you what I got with the Nikon I borrowed from my friend...Very far away and I doubt any one would want to buy them! |
if you were down the front you could get some decent photos though, and could potentially sell them or use them in newspapers or blogs. just because you walk in with a ticket with one seat number doesn't mean you won't have another ticket, swap seats or hand the camera to someone else who was down the front. you should see some of the photos my friends have taken from front row at the o2 at gigs. having been to the o2 enough times, if i was front row and there was a band on certain cameras only in certain seating areas, i'd just have someone else i know bring in the cameras from another area and pass it to me inside
artists don't usually mind so much the snap shots that are blurry and out of focus and far away, but for the same reason the press are only allowed the first 3 songs of gigs to take photos, they don't want shots of them looking all sweaty and worn out towards the end of the show. you can't make that out easily with crappy shots, but a decent camera down the front, and you can. plus artists don't like flashes going off too close to the stage as it can blind them for a second, which on top of not being nice, and being sore on the eyes, could cause them to trip and fall
now if the artist did trip and fall or something else unusual happened at the gig, then that's when a decent photo could make money