AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

Swine flu cases drop in England

Post Reply
Old 13-11-2009, 8:25 AM   #1
News Supplying Robot
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cyberspace
Experience Points:
206,601, Level: 100
Points: 206,601, Level: 100 Points: 206,601, Level: 100 Points: 206,601, Level: 100
Activity: 99.0%
Activity: 99.0% Activity: 99.0% Activity: 99.0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 273
Posts: 13,428
Exclamation Swine flu cases drop in England

The number of new swine flu cases in the past week fell by nearly a quarter to 64,000 in England, figures show.

More...
  Quote
Old 17-12-2009, 11:25 PM   #2
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle
Experience Points:
1,708, Level: 9
Points: 1,708, Level: 9 Points: 1,708, Level: 9 Points: 1,708, Level: 9
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 136, Got 179
Posts: 976
Wait, I thought it was supposed to infect 1/3 of us during this time where flu strives?

Guess I was right, eh GasDad?
  Quote
Old 18-12-2009, 8:58 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
GasDad's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bristol
Experience Points:
4,993, Level: 16
Points: 4,993, Level: 16 Points: 4,993, Level: 16 Points: 4,993, Level: 16
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 1,509, Got 722
Posts: 5,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mullicious View Post
Wait, I thought it was supposed to infect 1/3 of us during this time where flu strives?

Guess I was right, eh GasDad?
No - it was expected to hit a 1/3 of the population over a two year period without intervention.

But we've had intervention: antivirals which reduce the vector count, and of course vaccination (particularly of children - the main spreaders), so the projected infection rate will be less than 1/3 by now.

It may be no more lethal than 'normal' flu - but unfortunately the deaths that are occurring are in young adults and children - unlike normal flu which predominately hits the old.

Last edited by GasDad; 18-12-2009 at 9:04 AM.
  Quote
Old 18-12-2009, 11:13 AM   #4
Senior Moderator
 
alexs2's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Experience Points:
30,879, Level: 42
Points: 30,879, Level: 42 Points: 30,879, Level: 42 Points: 30,879, Level: 42
Activity: 32.6%
Activity: 32.6% Activity: 32.6% Activity: 32.6%
Thanks: Gave 388, Got 1,230
Posts: 12,304
Quote:
Originally Posted by GasDad View Post
No - it was expected to hit a 1/3 of the population over a two year period without intervention.

But we've had intervention: antivirals which reduce the vector count, and of course vaccination (particularly of children - the main spreaders), so the projected infection rate will be less than 1/3 by now.

It may be no more lethal than 'normal' flu - but unfortunately the deaths that are occurring are in young adults and children - unlike normal flu which predominately hits the old.
I would say that it's unfortunate that there are deaths in any age group,young or old,and I am sure that this is what you had meant.

What is fortunate is that the overall death rate from this particular strain has been rather lower than first projected,and is lower than "ordinary" flu by some considerable margin.
  Quote
Old 18-12-2009, 10:54 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
GasDad's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bristol
Experience Points:
4,993, Level: 16
Points: 4,993, Level: 16 Points: 4,993, Level: 16 Points: 4,993, Level: 16
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 1,509, Got 722
Posts: 5,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexs2 View Post
I would say that it's unfortunate that there are deaths in any age group,young or old,and I am sure that this is what you had meant.
Yes of course - though as a parent I'd rather loose a grandfather than a child.

Quote:
What is fortunate is that the overall death rate from this particular strain has been rather lower than first projected,and is lower than "ordinary" flu by some considerable margin.
There seems to be a lot of variable stats on this - it's definitely lower than expected - probably because a large portion of the older (and normally most vulnerable) population seem to be carry a degree of immunity.

I just hope that 5, 10,15, or 30 years down the road, when the next pandemic threatens, that we have the same (or better) level of response from world governments. This time we've probably been lucky (barring any mutated strain appearing) - next time it may start out the same, but be much more serious.
  Quote
Old 02-01-2010, 7:11 PM   #6
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Experience Points:
4,944, Level: 16
Points: 4,944, Level: 16 Points: 4,944, Level: 16 Points: 4,944, Level: 16
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 36, Got 43
Posts: 720
I think we have been REALLY lucky.

I hope that next time a pandemic hits:-
We have enough intensive care beds. If the government estimations were true then we would fall short by at least a factor of 4. (Source BBC documentry)

We have better deployment of the vaccinations. (some people were complaining that every surgery got sent 500 doses regardless of practice size so some GPs had way too many and some had way too few.)
They should allocate them on the same basis that they to for regular flu vaccinations as the number of high risk cases will be very similar.

And biggest of all I hope that they sort out the GPs payments and targets well before the immunisation program is announced. The government announced that they would immunise all under 5's because of the disproportionate number of deaths in this age group. The GP's and government then proceeded to bicker over how much they were going to get paid and what other targets are allowed to slip. I don't think they have yet reached an agreement and local PCTs have had to make their own arrangements. I still do not know if my under 5 is going to be called up yet.

I am very glad that the number of cases is falling and hope it continues to do so.

-Neil

Last edited by neilneil; 02-01-2010 at 7:15 PM.
  Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 1:37 PM   #7
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Experience Points:
15,646, Level: 30
Points: 15,646, Level: 30 Points: 15,646, Level: 30 Points: 15,646, Level: 30
Activity: 1.4%
Activity: 1.4% Activity: 1.4% Activity: 1.4%
Thanks: Gave 393, Got 344
Posts: 5,586
I was watching a news report the other day (can't remember if it was a UK or Irish channel), and it mentioned all the millions of vaccines that were either being returned or cancelled before delivery. It mentioned UK, Ireland, France, Germany and it ran into tens of millions.

It was all a damp squib after all.
  Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 2:46 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
GasDad's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bristol
Experience Points:
4,993, Level: 16
Points: 4,993, Level: 16 Points: 4,993, Level: 16 Points: 4,993, Level: 16
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 1,509, Got 722
Posts: 5,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMCF View Post

It was all a damp squib after all.
Yes it probably was (except for those who died from it) - as above, barring a mutation we've got of lightly this time.

But the thing with squibs is you don't know there damp until they fail to go off.

The same applies to flu outbreaks.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off