| Re: Banksy art or a graffiti mess
I must admit I unashamedly adore Banksy's work, but I likening it to what most people would call Graffiti (as several people have in this thread) is so far off the mark as to be ridiculous.
Obviously much of what he does takes it's roots from standard 'tagging' in that it is covert, unsolicited and often makes use of public buildings and amenities, but it isn't hard to see the huge difference between his often very funny and painstakingly created stencil work and the very variable quality of the somewhat freeform 'mural' pieces seen on previously bare walls in the urban sprawl. The 808/Rolf piece Dazza has posted is symptomatic of this - if you didn't know that Rolf had sketched himself I suspect you'd pass it off as a fairly dire amateur work. Actually I think I would anyway...
There is even less comparison to the artless, meaningless vandalism of 'signature' tags that makes up the bulk of the graffiti we see on a daily basis.
He's done so much more than the wall work as well - I'm especially fond of the plastic shark fins he distributed throughout the 2ft of muddy water at a particularily wet Glastonbury one year and also the carefully doctored 'old masters' he's smuggled into (and carefully hung) in various art galleries.
Much of his wit used to be brilliantly subversive, though I think he has inevitably suffered from being over successful - it's hard to rebel when you've become part of the status quo.
I think the removal of his enormous and vary carefully painted Pulp Fiction Jules and Vincent (with bananas) from an entirely crappy bit of featureless wall above Old Street tube by some utter morons at Transport for London was a disgrace (he's twice since replaced it with newer, less iconic works).
I remember stumbling upon an original Bansky down a dingy back alley in Melbourne, Australia - next to some old bins one of his Rats peered out at me...
Last edited by J1mbo; 13-06-2009 at 1:23 PM.
|