AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

Humax Foxsat HDR or Panasonic XS 350?

Post Reply
Old 20-11-2009, 2:50 PM   #1
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Experience Points:
4,188, Level: 15
Points: 4,188, Level: 15 Points: 4,188, Level: 15 Points: 4,188, Level: 15
Activity: 5.4%
Activity: 5.4% Activity: 5.4% Activity: 5.4%
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 17
Posts: 554
Humax Foxsat HDR or Panasonic XS 350?

I am looking to buy a Freesat recorder.

Was initially looking at the Humax Foxsat HDR but have just come across the Panasonic XS 350.

I can see that the Humax is just a pvr and the Panny has both recordable hard drive and dvd and costs about £150 more (currently about £400)

It would be appreciated to hear comments as to which is best to help me decide which to go for.

Apart from the fact that the Panny also has a recordable dvd and hence potentially more versatile which has the best overall performance and functions?

I understand that the Panny will only allow you to record two channels and you will have to watch one of thoses being recorded, but the Humax will allow two recordings and will allow you to watch another third channel?

Comments on either the Humax and Panny would be appreciated.
  Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 4:26 PM   #2
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redditch
Experience Points:
28,191, Level: 40
Points: 28,191, Level: 40 Points: 28,191, Level: 40 Points: 28,191, Level: 40
Activity: 89.2%
Activity: 89.2% Activity: 89.2% Activity: 89.2%
Thanks: Gave 39, Got 2,263
Posts: 12,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by asprint View Post
I am looking to buy a Freesat recorder.

Was initially looking at the Humax Foxsat HDR but have just come across the Panasonic XS 350.

I can see that the Humax is just a pvr and the Panny has both recordable hard drive and dvd and costs about £150 more (currently about £400)

It would be appreciated to hear comments as to which is best to help me decide which to go for.

Apart from the fact that the Panny also has a recordable dvd and hence potentially more versatile which has the best overall performance and functions?

I understand that the Panny will only allow you to record two channels and you will have to watch one of thoses being recorded, but the Humax will allow two recordings and will allow you to watch another third channel?

Comments on either the Humax and Panny would be appreciated.
It really depends on how much the convenience of a built in DVD recorder is worth remembering that the hdr can transer SD recordings to a PC to make DVD backups anyway.

Not sure about the Panny but the hdr can archive most HD and all SD to an external USB drive and replay the recordings from there., effectively giving it unlimited archiving. I have a 1Tb WD sata drive permanently connected to the rear usb port in a slot in caddy that I transfer recordings to . When it's full I just have to slot in another drive.

£150.00 would buy you two 1Tb drives and a caddy and leave you change.

Last edited by grahamlthompson; 20-11-2009 at 4:28 PM.
  Quote
Old 19-02-2010, 10:58 PM   #3
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Experience Points:
1,147, Level: 7
Points: 1,147, Level: 7 Points: 1,147, Level: 7 Points: 1,147, Level: 7
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by asprint View Post
I am looking to buy a Freesat recorder.

Was initially looking at the Humax Foxsat HDR but have just come across the Panasonic XS 350.

I can see that the Humax is just a pvr and the Panny has both recordable hard drive and dvd and costs about £150 more (currently about £400)

It would be appreciated to hear comments as to which is best to help me decide which to go for.

Apart from the fact that the Panny also has a recordable dvd and hence potentially more versatile which has the best overall performance and functions?

I understand that the Panny will only allow you to record two channels and you will have to watch one of thoses being recorded, but the Humax will allow two recordings and will allow you to watch another third channel?

Comments on either the Humax and Panny would be appreciated.
Hi,
We are struggling with exactly the same question. Appreciating this was posted a few months ago, which did you decide to go for and how is it working out?
Many people seem to recommend the Humax but not so many the Panasonic, so we wondered if there's something wrong with it?!
Many thanks.
  Quote
Old 20-02-2010, 11:11 AM   #4
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Experience Points:
3,456, Level: 13
Points: 3,456, Level: 13 Points: 3,456, Level: 13 Points: 3,456, Level: 13
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 2
I own both of these units and to be honest the Panasonic is pants, you would not believe a company such as this would make product as bad as the XS350, anyway you can read my review on Amazon here, the Humax may not have the recordable DVD but its the more accomplished product by far
  Quote
Old 21-02-2010, 12:31 PM   #5
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Experience Points:
2,288, Level: 11
Points: 2,288, Level: 11 Points: 2,288, Level: 11 Points: 2,288, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 41
Panny

I have the XS350 and have just read the Amazon review.

I guess I would agree with it. However it depends what you use the Panny for.
We hardly ever need to record anything to DVD, we record TV progs. and then watch them at our leisure. Used this way the machine is excellent, yes it is a little slow to respond but given the excellent recorded picture I can forgive that.

You can record two channels while watching playback of something you have previously recorded. I don't think any can record two and watch a third,would this not require three tuners?

It is connected to a Panasonic 37inch G10 Lcd TV and so has the link control,it can also connect via Broadband to Picassa and Youtube, iplayer will be available soon.
Can't comment on the Humax,not used one.
  Quote
Old 21-02-2010, 1:40 PM   #6
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redditch
Experience Points:
28,191, Level: 40
Points: 28,191, Level: 40 Points: 28,191, Level: 40 Points: 28,191, Level: 40
Activity: 89.2%
Activity: 89.2% Activity: 89.2% Activity: 89.2%
Thanks: Gave 39, Got 2,263
Posts: 12,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
You can record two channels while watching playback of something you have previously recorded. I don't think any can record two and watch a third,would this not require three tuners?
The freeview tuners used in Humax and Topfield pvrs and the ones used in the Freesat Humax Foxsat-hdr can demux two channels at the same time from the same multiplex/transponder

This gives the following capability

If both the recording channels share the same mux/transponder then only 1 tuner is required for both recordings. The second tuner is completely unused so can be used to view any other channel and even on the hdr buffer it to the hdd allowing time shifting as well

If both tuners are using different mux/transponders then 3rd channel viewing is available from any channel sharing a mux/transponder as either recording is from.

Add to this the capability of the hdr to use both tuners with only a single lnb means that recording/viewing wise it's a lot more flexible.

In theory (and in practice on the Humax Icord) two tuners can record up to 4 channels at the same time

Believe it or not a Topfield Freeview pvr tuner with the aid of a tap can record a whole mux at the same time - you do need a big hdd though
  Quote
Old 22-02-2010, 2:06 PM   #7
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Experience Points:
2,288, Level: 11
Points: 2,288, Level: 11 Points: 2,288, Level: 11 Points: 2,288, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 41
"If both the recording channels share the same mux/transponder then only 1 tuner is required for both recordings. The second tuner is completely unused so can be used to view any other channel and even on the hdr buffer it to the hdd allowing time shifting as well

If both tuners are using different mux/transponders then 3rd channel viewing is available from any channel sharing a mux/transponder as either recording is from.

Add to this the capability of the hdr to use both tuners with only a single lnb means that recording/viewing wise it's a lot more flexible."

Thanks for that Graham, yet again I learn something new from this forum.
I'll give it a try!
  Quote
Post Reply

Powered by  
 Latest popular product prices
Goodmans GFSAT101SD DVB-S 
3 prices from
 £34.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Goodmans GFSAT101SD DVB-S 
3 prices from
 £34.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Bush BFSAT02SD DVB-S 
1 price
 £40.94 Click to show/hide the offers

Bush BFSAT02SD DVB-S 
1 price
 £40.94 Click to show/hide the offers

Humax FOXSAT DVB-S/DVB-S2 
5 prices from
 £104.95 Click to show/hide the offers

Humax FOXSAT DVB-S/DVB-S2 
5 prices from
 £104.95 Click to show/hide the offers

Grundig GUFSATHD DVB-S 
1 price
 £99.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Grundig GUFSATHD DVB-S 
1 price
 £99.99 Click to show/hide the offers

 Updated February 12th at 10:30pm. Prices include delivery.


Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off