Quote:
Originally Posted by Geofbob What is not at all clear from your post is why you seem to have opted for satellite reception at all - unless you want Sky, which you don't mention. |
thanks for both your replies:
to Geofbob - I'm not really interested in Sky - the reason is that my house has a flat roof with a parapet and basically a TV aerial would stick up and look darn ugly whereas I'm told that a sat dish can sit on the roof behind the parapet so that it can't be seen from the street. The house is a new house and I've gone to a lot of trouble to avoid cables etc. from sticking out here there and everywhere - and the builder put the co-ax which was going to to serve the tv aerial in the wrong place (i.e. it was going to be in a discreet corner but now can't).
I suppose the other choice would be to get a tv aerial that can sit flat beneath the parapet - do these exist and are they any good?
I'd heard about freeview HD but didn't realise it was coming to London as soon as next year - but that would suggest that it's not worth buying a new tv now (as most come with normal freeview which from the sounds of it may become obsolete?)!
I hear what you say about low quality from the sat dish - could this be enhanced by a booster of some sort?
to Martin:
1. thinking about tv in minimum 3 rooms but could be as many as 5 in the future.
2. interesting - so I could put a radio aerial (noting above) on the roof and send it down the same co-ax? would I then split it at the wall plate?
3. I generally believe in separates - that way things can be upgraded one at a time if necessary - but just really checking that the same logic applies to sat. TV
4. thanks - noted.
Won't we all be watching tv by broadband soon anyway - and therefore I won't need an aerial at all???!
Thanks again