Member Log In

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Terry charged by The FA

Post Reply
Old 09-07-2012, 9:24 PM   #61
Veteran Member
RMCF's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Thanks: Gave 507, Got 442
Posts: 6,241
Just read this line in the BBC report:

If found guilty, the maximum sentence Mr Terry could receive is a £2,500 fine.

Got me thinking, "whats the point?". All this hassle for a £2500 fine that Terry would earn in a couple of hrs work. Surely this is no deterrent at all.

If there was a chance of him doing a little bit of time, then it might actually change things.
  Quote
Advert
Log in or sign up to remove
Old 09-07-2012, 9:41 PM   #62
Veteran Member
Naaktgeboren's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kashyyyk
Thanks: Gave 452, Got 869
Posts: 5,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMCF View Post
Just read this line in the BBC report:

If found guilty, the maximum sentence Mr Terry could receive is a £2,500 fine.

Got me thinking, "whats the point?". All this hassle for a £2500 fine that Terry would earn in a couple of hrs work. Surely this is no deterrent at all.

If there was a chance of him doing a little bit of time, then it might actually change things.
Couple of hours?? Pocket change surely
  Quote
Old 09-07-2012, 9:43 PM   #63
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Thanks: Gave 392, Got 475
Posts: 5,927
Can't believe the derisory maximum punishment.

He's probably spent more on a bottle of wine.
  Quote
Old 09-07-2012, 10:08 PM   #64
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 73, Got 119
Posts: 630
Yes, but would be a deterrent for most of us...... you can't base a fine on how much he can afford.

And as was said earlier, this is just a magistrates case with very limited options for scale of punishment

Any guilty verdict would have a much bigger implication for him than a fine would do for normal people anyway
  Quote
Old 09-07-2012, 11:27 PM   #65
Eminent Member
FZR400RRSP's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Aberdeen
Thanks: Gave 1,359, Got 2,952
Posts: 21,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyparksy

Any guilty verdict would have a much bigger implication for him than a fine would do for normal people anyway
Correct, the fine really would be the tip of the iceberg for a public figure found guilty of a race crime.
  Quote
Old 09-07-2012, 11:53 PM   #66
Veteran Member
RMCF's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Thanks: Gave 507, Got 442
Posts: 6,241
But would it affect his career?

I guess even if found guilty then he will still be playing football at Chelsea and earning £150,000 per week next season.

So where is the punishment? How has it affected him? Many people already assume he is a racist, so the verdict is irrelevant for many.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 12:58 AM   #67
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 293
Posts: 1,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMCF View Post
But would it affect his career?

I guess even if found guilty then he will still be playing football at Chelsea and earning £150,000 per week next season.

So where is the punishment? How has it affected him? Many people already assume he is a racist, so the verdict is irrelevant for many.
Are you kidding, if found guilty he says to go. The FA, the league and CFC have been trying to stamp out racism for years. English football has already had its reputation dragged through the mud and now at least in one respect is the envy of the world. If Chelsea keep John Terry, and as the captain, and an ex captain of England, it would a slap in the face for English football.

As a west London boy and life long Chelsea fan, if he's found guilty and he's still at CFC, I swear I will switch allegiances to Brentford or Fulham instead.

Just as an afterthought. I had the offer of a guided tour of Stamford Bridge around Christmas with a group of friends but couldn't go. In the dressing room, the guide let slip that the dressing room was segregated. One side was for the English players and the other for foreign players, apparently from the demands of John Terry. The story was leaked to the Daily Mail which CFC denied as a misunderstanding or a joke. I have it on good authority that is what the tour guide said.

Whatever happens, the guy is or was a powerful and influential figure at Stamford Bridge.

A friend's comment says it all for me:
Quote:
Its funny seeing some people say that certain people are out to damage John Terry's reputation when he has done far more to damage it himself. I have respect for him as a footballer but sadly none for him as a man.

Last edited by hopeless; 10-07-2012 at 1:10 AM.
  Quote
Thanks from:
stormberg (11-07-2012)
Old 10-07-2012, 6:17 AM   #68
Senior Member
Stu V's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Thanks: Gave 195, Got 276
Posts: 1,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by kopchoir View Post
It was his wife that told him that,again I refer you to my previous post and parksy post. Not about Anton vs Terry. But terry defence is that Anton heard it he accepted heat of the moment slur.
Now Anton says he didn't hear terry say it so to me throws out Terry's defence.
Didn't take that in. My brain's not in gear at the moment, not that it's great at the best of times but more so at the moment

Just for the record if he is found guilty then he should never play for the club again. Chances of that - zero
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 8:59 AM   #69
Veteran Member
liamt's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Thanks: Gave 928, Got 899
Posts: 6,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyparksy View Post
And a couple of utd ones as well ;-)
you have failed to grasp this thread. negrito is an offensive word in many places. the vampire admitted to calling evra that. not sure why i am deluded?
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 9:00 AM   #70
Veteran Member
liamt's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Thanks: Gave 928, Got 899
Posts: 6,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMCF View Post
Just read this line in the BBC report:

If found guilty, the maximum sentence Mr Terry could receive is a £2,500 fine.

Got me thinking, "whats the point?". All this hassle for a £2500 fine that Terry would earn in a couple of hrs work. Surely this is no deterrent at all.

If there was a chance of him doing a little bit of time, then it might actually change things.
how come that welsh racist got jail time then for his twitter comments?
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 10:42 AM   #71
Prominent Member
dr no's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Thanks: Gave 124, Got 244
Posts: 3,389
A lot of us Chelsea fans have had enough of him.
He has become a liability and a constant distraction over the last few years.

As with our current theme for change we should relegate him to the bench and stick with Luiz, Cahill and Ivanovic as our central defence.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 11:16 AM   #72
Ex Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: Gave 104, Got 289
Posts: 25,590
I think that the whole thing is a ridiculous farce as this five day trial will cost the taxpayer millions.

I find it a daft situation that it's quite acceptable to call someone a ****ing **** during a football match but if you insert the word "black" in the middle it becomes a race crime and we have a multi million pound trial over it
  Quote
Thanks from:
neilios (10-07-2012)
Old 10-07-2012, 11:26 AM   #73
Prominent Member
Saldawop's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 270, Got 536
Posts: 4,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wore Nowt View Post
I think that the whole thing is a ridiculous farce as this five day trial will cost the taxpayer millions.

I find it a daft situation that it's quite acceptable to call someone a ****ing **** during a football match but if you insert the word "black" in the middle it becomes a race crime and we have a multi million pound trial over it
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 11:27 AM   #74
Illustrious Member
Abbeygoo's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Manchester
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: Gave 3,103, Got 3,233
Posts: 19,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wore Nowt View Post
I find it a daft situation that it's quite acceptable to call someone a ****ing **** during a football match but if you insert the word "black" in the middle it becomes a race crime and we have a multi million pound trial over it
Are you serious?
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 11:28 AM   #75
Prominent Member
Donnacha's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: York
Thanks: Gave 539, Got 338
Posts: 4,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by liamt View Post
you have failed to grasp this thread. negrito is an offensive word in many places. the vampire admitted to calling evra that. not sure why i am deluded?
Maybe if you read the FA report you would realise that it is not the word he was accused of using !

Can we keep this thread on Terry please, as many are tired of us hypocritical Liverpool lawyers and have had enough of the Suarez case?
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 11:43 AM   #76
Veteran Member
Naaktgeboren's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kashyyyk
Thanks: Gave 452, Got 869
Posts: 5,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr no
A lot of us Chelsea fans have had enough of him.
He has become a liability and a constant distraction over the last few years.

As with our current theme for change we should relegate him to the bench and stick with Luiz, Cahill and Ivanovic as our central defence.
Racism in any form cannot be condoned, it's just not acceptable. He has admitted it I read and the argument appears to be based on context??

When you say "a lot of us Chelsea fans". I guess you are talking about friends of yours or people you know as your feelings are definatly not feelings shared by the mass of Chelsea supporters, this is clear if you look at Shedtalk or anywhere similar.

He is our captain and without him, we would not even have been in the Champions League final.

He may come across as an absolute **** at the best of times but I am not into the showbizz footballer lifestyle tabloid junk, I go by what I see on the pitch and there is nobody as influential as JT at Chelsea. We would be a lot poorer without him.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 11:49 AM   #77
Illustrious Member
Abbeygoo's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Manchester
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: Gave 3,103, Got 3,233
Posts: 19,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnacha View Post
Maybe if you read the FA report you would realise that it is not the word he was accused of using !
I've read the report a few times and it has given me a headache!

Yes, that wasn't the word he used but something similar.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 11:51 AM   #78
Prominent Member
djdhrubs's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SW London
Thanks: Gave 941, Got 197
Posts: 3,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wore Nowt View Post
I think that the whole thing is a ridiculous farce as this five day trial will cost the taxpayer millions.

I find it a daft situation that it's quite acceptable to call someone a ****ing **** during a football match but if you insert the word "black" in the middle it becomes a race crime and we have a multi million pound trial over it
??!!!!!

Obviously the 'black' comment makes it a race crime, as it's a reference to race!

Without the word 'black' you're left with a crude insult, nothing more.

You clearly don't get it and need some education. The difference between a crude insult and a disgraceful career-ending statement which taps into hundreds of years of illegal oppression and hate can just be one word.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 12:22 PM   #79
Prominent Member
dr no's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Thanks: Gave 124, Got 244
Posts: 3,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naaktgeboren View Post
Racism in any form cannot be condoned, it's just not acceptable. He has admitted it I read and the argument appears to be based on context??

When you say "a lot of us Chelsea fans". I guess you are talking about friends of yours or people you know as your feelings are definatly not feelings shared by the mass of Chelsea supporters, this is clear if you look at Shedtalk or anywhere similar.

He is our captain and without him, we would not even have been in the Champions League final.

He may come across as an absolute **** at the best of times but I am not into the showbizz footballer lifestyle tabloid junk, I go by what I see on the pitch and there is nobody as influential as JT at Chelsea. We would be a lot poorer without him.
Yep, I am going based on all the Chelsea supporters around me which includes a lot of those you mention. I don't follow any football forums other than here

I am not disagreeing of JTs stature and contribution to Chelsea but I do think we are undergoing a sea change. The football RA wants needs a different type of defence. With all of JTs shenanigans this may be a good time to take a backseat and help the team and youngsters from a backroom role.

Chelsea needs to build its support base nationally and internationally. We are doing this with trophies but a better image is definitely required for this happen quicker. All IMO of course.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 12:46 PM   #80
Eminent Member
kopchoir's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Anfield Theatre of Reality
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: Gave 5,648, Got 2,897
Posts: 20,666
The FA has made a statement, they feel that Terry's word is more believable than Ferdinand's because he wore a neater suit and spoke with more remorse.

The 114 statement has come to the conclusion that Ferdinand is guilty of lying and provocation.

Liverpool have made a formal apology to Chelsea and QPR.
  Quote
Thanks from:
Stu V (10-07-2012)
Old 10-07-2012, 2:00 PM   #81
Senior Member
Stu V's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Thanks: Gave 195, Got 276
Posts: 1,745
JT's lawyers have for the case to be dismissed

BBC News - John Terry lawyers urge racism case to be thrown out
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 2:17 PM   #82
Senior Member
Westindieman's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Thanks: Gave 147, Got 78
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by hopeless View Post
Just as an afterthought. I had the offer of a guided tour of Stamford Bridge around Christmas with a group of friends but couldn't go. In the dressing room, the guide let slip that the dressing room was segregated. One side was for the English players and the other for foreign players, apparently from the demands of John Terry. The story was leaked to the Daily Mail which CFC denied as a misunderstanding or a joke. I have it on good authority that is what the tour guide said.

Whatever happens, the guy is or was a powerful and influential figure at Stamford Bridge.

A friend's comment says it all for me:
I find that hard to believe. Wouldnt the foreign and even black players be revolting at Chelsea if that were the case. Would you really have me believe Drogba or Cole would put up with that?

Back to the case, I am puzzled as to the truth of whether this guy is racist or not. If the truth is he has supported the charities of Desailly and Drogba's. But then whether his lawyer is saying the lip reader states it is inconclusive while for me there is no doubt what he has said, what is the point in allowing that line? And why did he say it if he isnt racist, I dont get that you would be asking someone '..are you accusing me of saying....'
Im puzzled by it all.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 2:35 PM   #83
Senior Member
Stu V's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Thanks: Gave 195, Got 276
Posts: 1,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westindieman View Post
I find that hard to believe. Wouldnt the foreign and even black players be revolting at Chelsea if that were the case. Would you really have me believe Drogba or Cole would put up with that?

Back to the case, I am puzzled as to the truth of whether this guy is racist or not. If the truth is he has supported the charities of Desailly and Drogba's. But then whether his lawyer is saying the lip reader states it is inconclusive while for me there is no doubt what he has said, what is the point in allowing that line? And why did he say it if he isnt racist, I dont get that you would be asking someone '..are you accusing me of saying....'
Im puzzled by it all.
He has played alongside all nationalities and races in his time with Chelsea and if he is racist then I would have thought someone would have outed him, especially now. However none have and he has the support of former teammates including black ones such as Marcel Desailly. He may have turned out to have made a racist comment in the heat of the moment (we shall see). Ron Atkinson was another example of someone making a stupid comment but not regarded as a racist.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 2:38 PM   #84
Senior Member
Stu V's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Thanks: Gave 195, Got 276
Posts: 1,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu V View Post
JT's lawyers have for the case to be dismissed

BBC News - John Terry lawyers urge racism case to be thrown out
Which has now been rejected. Trial continues.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 3:16 PM   #85
Eminent Member
kopchoir's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Anfield Theatre of Reality
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: Gave 5,648, Got 2,897
Posts: 20,666
Personally if i was the prosecution i would of called my star witness.

The Prosecution calls Ledley King to the stand me lord.
The Prosecution rests
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 3:18 PM   #86
Senior Member
Stu V's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Thanks: Gave 195, Got 276
Posts: 1,745
You're on form today Kop
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 3:21 PM   #87
Prominent Member
dr no's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Thanks: Gave 124, Got 244
Posts: 3,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu V View Post
He has played alongside all nationalities and races in his time with Chelsea and if he is racist then I would have thought someone would have outed him, especially now. However none have and he has the support of former teammates including black ones such as Marcel Desailly. He may have turned out to have made a racist comment in the heat of the moment (we shall see). Ron Atkinson was another example of someone making a stupid comment but not regarded as a racist.
I just cannot imagine him to be racist.
As you have pointed out he has been working alongside all colours and creed.
And no one can doubt the team spirit at Chelsea.

Why oh why couldn't he just admit he used racist words in the heat of the moment but isn't a racist and apologise profusely?
FA would have punished him and that would have been the end of that.
Instead he got caught lying with his cover story and of course the waiting hounds (press) leapt for him as they are always looking to do.

Who at Chelsea advises this guy?
He seems always to try lie his way out of it.
He tried to lie his way after the sending off at Barca too.

Lets hope for a speedy end to this farce.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 3:26 PM   #88
Senior Member
Westindieman's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Thanks: Gave 147, Got 78
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by kopchoir View Post
Personally if i was the prosecution i would of called my star witness.

The Prosecution calls Ledley King to the stand me lord.
The Prosecution rests

Dont get it. I know they had a spat at White Hart lane a few years back and Terry was sent off later for a 2nd yellow but cant think off anything else.
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 3:39 PM   #89
Eminent Member
kopchoir's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Anfield Theatre of Reality
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: Gave 5,648, Got 2,897
Posts: 20,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westindieman View Post
Dont get it. I know they had a spat at White Hart lane a few years back and Terry was sent off later for a 2nd yellow but cant think off anything else.
BBC SPORT | Football | My Club | Chelsea | I want to manage Chelsea - Terry

just google it mate
  Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 3:43 PM   #90
Senior Member
Westindieman's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Thanks: Gave 147, Got 78
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by kopchoir View Post
I see. Smoke indicates fire somewhere.........
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off