Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Entertainment Players and Recorders > Blu-ray and DVD Players > DVD Players

Today's price checkPowered by
LG DRT389H
Sony DVP-FX730
Panasonic DMR-EX769 160GB
LG RHT497H 160GB
LG DRT389H 
Sony DVP-FX730 
Panasonic DMR-EX769 160GB 
LG RHT497H 160GB 
Philips DVP3310 
Panasonic DMR-EX98V 250GB 
Panasonic DMR-EX79 250GB 
Panasonic DMR-XS350 250GB 
Samsung DVD-H1080 
Panasonic DMR-EZ48 
 More...Prices updated November 23rd at 8:30pm and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2006, 12:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 277
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 7
Best picture quality, interlaced or progressive?

As title. Which one is "generally" considered to give the better picture with an LCD tv?
Also, can/do most dvd players do upscaling over component, or only over HDMI?
Thanks.
rainstel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 1:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,819
Thanks: Gave 115, Got 118
i think some players do upscale via component?

and progressive is generally better, but it can depend on your equipment afaik
rhino2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 4:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
nick501's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walsall, West Midlands
Posts: 4,450
Thanks: Gave 413, Got 345
my sammy hd850 could upscale via component. (before i sold it)

progressive is quite a bit better imho.
nick501 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 4:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 277
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 7
I've read that quite a lot of ppl going on about using interlacing, if progressive is that good, why would they do that? thanks.
rainstel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 5:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
Timbo21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 3,777
Thanks: Gave 304, Got 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by rainstel
As title. Which one is "generally" considered to give the better picture with an LCD tv?
Also, can/do most dvd players do upscaling over component, or only over HDMI?
Thanks.
It really depends on if the player has got the better deinterlacing or if the display has. I think you have to hunt around for players that will upscale over component. Something like the Snazio 1350 I think will do it, but you'd have to check, & it will play WMV-HD & DiVXHD amongst others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rainstel
I've read that quite a lot of ppl going on about using interlacing, if progressive is that good, why would they do that? thanks.
That is the best option if you are using an external scaler/video processor, since it has had the least done to it, thus leaving the VP to do the scaling & deinterlacing. This is why players like the Pioneer 989 are useful, since they will output interlaced over HDMI. Again, if your projector or plasma etc. has excellent processing & scaling built in, then sending it interlaced will be the best option.
__________________
My New(ish) HT. It's Here

I love the smell of AV in the morning

Last edited by Timbo21; 12-03-2006 at 5:18 PM.
Timbo21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 5:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Somewhere in South Yorkshire
Posts: 9,269
Thanks: Gave 465, Got 946
This is a copy/paste of a post I did elsewhere on this subject. In the case in point, the TV was a 1280x720 device. If yours is (say) 1366x768, replace 720p with 768p (etc):

Fact 1: The signal encoded on all (PAL) DVD discs is 576i. That means 576 lines, interlaced.

Fact 2: The image displayed on your TV screen is ALWAYS 720p. That's 720 lines, progressive. This is the only image structure your TV can display.

To get from the one to the other, your equipment somehow has to

a) de-interlace. That means, convert from i to p (from interlaced to progressive).

b) re-scale. That means, (in this case) convert from 576 lines to 720.

Depending on your equipment, these two things may happen either in the DVD player or in the TV.

For example, if you feed your TV with a simple video signal (576i) then the TV will both de-interlace and scale it (i.e. convert to 720p).

Conversely, if you feed your TV with an already converted 720p signal, then it doesn't have to do this job, even though it can.

The only thing that might be gained by de-interlacing and/or rescaling in the DVD player (if it could) would be if it did a better job than the TV.
__________________
Nigel
Except on matters of forum moderation, the views expressed in this post are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of AVForums.
LV426 is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
interlaced, picture, progressive, quality
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:18 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting