Quote:
Originally Posted by Mackle So you reckon one of those backfiring 5320 enclosures with a 250W amp would give me something comparable to an SVS PB13U? That really would put my Epos M-sub to shame!! All for around £400 of parts... I'm guessing there isn't a ready-made sub at this price that can compete either. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by micb3rd You not going to have PB13U performance from something that has 1/3rd the power (250WRMS vs 750 WRMS) and a pair of average 12's in a sealed enclosure. |
I agree with micb3rd, the MX's I had didnt compete for depth. Sound quality was superior though, and depth was still good. I could still feel the MX subs as well, and they could thump you hard in the chest, the ultra though could shake things beyond what the MX subs could. IMO the Ultra sounded very clean and its depth was awsome, but after the MX demo, it somehow seemed to lack a bit of character, especially musically.
IMO, the Ultra is an out and out HT sub that does a decent job with music, while the MK seems to be the other way round. When it comes to comparing the 2 though, I would say the MX's are better at HT than the Ultra was with music, if that makes sense.
As it happens, I eventually decided I wanted a sub that was basically an M&K MX13U SVS

, I dont want to live without what either could produce.
If you build the 2500, you will have a sub with fantastic sound quality, excellent depth, and for an unbeatable price, just dont expect it to out 'depth' an Ultra, those things just go crazy deep with uber power, and falling a little short of the Ultra for depth is nothing to be ashamed of.