Quote:
Originally Posted by IronGiant f.eckless is one that the swear filter doesn't allow even though it isn't swearing. |
I got pulled up on the use of the above word minus the 'less' and even gained infraction points for its use. I never swear on forum, for there is no need. I can get my blaspheming rocks off in my day to day job in the construction industry where swearing is compulsory.
For the uneducated that thinks it originated with Father Ted and is a way of circumnavigating the swear filter; It was popularized with it's
potential double meaning (skillfully employed by Graham Linehan, the writer of Father Ted, The IT Crowd, etc) because it originally meant 'without faith'; Hence Father Ted's use in place of actual swearing.
The first instances of its written use was in the 1600s when the religious connotation was all that was intended and as an insult at that, but has since come to mean lazy, ineffectual, or without commitment. It's only since 'ing' was added to it (thanks Graham and Dermott!) that it became an acknowledged substitute for the more mundane day to day profanity.
It's one of those bizarre swear filter decisions that recognizes the modern (as in, within the last five minutes) corrupted use, rather than what it actually really means. As shown above, I've used a similarly corrupted word that simply means 'assembled on an ad-hoc basis from more than one source', but is never ever used in it's legitimzed sense with the suffix 'ized'. And yet it escapes the filter. Bizzare.
Russell