Quote:
Originally Posted by dave_bass5 Ok, sorry for posting it but that was done last night before we were told about the outcome. |
I had hinted it was being looked at
Quote:
|
There were quite a few of us asking why it had happened this way and why flickr wasn't included. We didnt get an answer and i dont think any of the mods even tried.
|
Ian J did it was because smugmug had links to DP review forums ( rival forums) Flickr does not . Nonetheless it was recognised that
AVF has own galleries albeit basic
Online Galleries are a bit more intrisic to photography than say gaming sites are to say the Xbox or PS3 forums
Hence rather than scarp them all Smugmug was reinstated
Saying that the atmosphere of that thread had become (IMHO) inflamatory to the extent even the most temperate mod would think twice before commenting. I think it went on a bit longer than it should have
Quote:
|
I would still like to know why i (and smugmug) were singled out in the first place, especially as i have had that link for well over a year or so (at lest).
|
You know why with smugmug now . As to why you were singled. It was really just another mod diligently trying to enforce the rules .The action not specifically targeting, just
perhaps done thinking zone or myself had not noticed .
You can PM if you are still unsure
Quote:
|
All i can see is that i can use my smugmug link, just like i have been doing for the past year or so, so no, i cant see that a lot has gone on. we are back where we started.
|
I would disagree
The threads Started by Stuart regarding AVF galleries, Reorganising the forums into subforums, Open views on links in signatures and restoring smugmug are a direct result of " not a lot going on" and may result in reworking the rules to restore harmony so.. we are moving foward IMHO by the time the thought and actions from the threads materialise
[QUOTE]I would like to thank you and the other mods in