Hello all,
Being a new season in the Camera Club and all that, i thought i would at least try and put some entries in. Having experienced a few rounds it has become clear to me that an "expertly taken" shot doesnt always do well.
The judges sometimes seem to pick shots that are classically good using the set rules for a good photo. Ones that seem different but are just as good dont do as well and that really frustrates me, especially as you cant disagree with them (think of, bats, photoshopping of a heron and model photos).
So heres my predicament.
Do i go for a shot that i know will score well, or do i go for a shot that i want to submit?
This shot i took sometime ago and i love it, simply because it makes me laugh and annoyed at the same time, but i know it wont do well as its not go a foreground, middle and background (though the rule of thirds can be applied here i guess)
Or what about this shot. This bench is where me, the missus and the boy went down to the seaside for the first time, so memories for me, and it does have leading lines, BUT its just a bench, so probably wont do well (oh and OK, the sky is blown out)
Or this, its got something in the foreground, middle and the sky? Not my favourtie shot but will "probably" score more than the 2 above, though i havent edited it to what i would like as yet.
Finally, again a shot i really like, but not sure it would do well in the competition as it doesnt follow some set rules (person looking out of shot, but on the thirds again).
I took this on the Guildford Meet a few months ago, so its an old shot.
Isnt the point of a competition to submit a good shot to get points and feedback with the eventual goal to win at the end of the season?
Well if that is the case then sod the ethics of it and submit shots that will do well rather than ones i like (playing devils advocate)
Hmmmm....