[bodoman]

Sorry, still finding photographs from Norway.
Taken with the Sigma 10-20, hand held and laying down low on a rock, i know i am showing a lot of water, but thats how it was, lots of water

[johnaalex]

Sorry, but I am sure this looked a great shot when you took it, but for me it is just a lot of water and nothing that really grabs the eye.

[bodoman]

Originally Posted by johnaalex

Sorry, but I am sure this looked a great shot when you took it, but for me it is just a lot of water and nothing that really grabs the eye.

Yep thats what you get with Seascapes John, loads of water

Nothing to be sorry about though, i am getting used to rejection, in fact i thrive on it

Actually i am beginning to scrape the bottom of the barrel with my Norway Pics, heres another one from the same spot, taken next morning when the sun came out for an hour

[Holowlegs]

Yep thats what you get with Seascapes John, loads of water

Made me laugh


Back to the pictures, not too sure about #1 nothing really there for me colours seem a bit dull.

#2 is a different kettle of fish. Like the reflection here and a nice sky. The colours are a lot better in this one


Cheers Holo

[Just call me Al]

First shot. *** (I'm sure great to be there). Second shot. Wow.

[bodoman]

Looks like the first one is gaining a bit of a reputation on here, i suspect its a bit ahead of its time

[rizingstar]

Like the 2nd one, it's a bit willy wonky but who cares

Were you floating on the water for this one?

[jonnypb]

i like the 2nd one and is by far the best

just shows how pics can look so differently in different conditions

[RobDickinson]

2nd shot is nice, shows one downside of the 10-20 with landscapes tho, lotta sky and foreground.

Work on your PP tho, remove the dust bunnies etc !!

[Biscuit761]

Another vote for No 2. Nice.

Bill