[Radiohead]

Not a website as such, but a good article:

Are photographers really a threat?

Fight, brothers and sisters, fight...

[Yandros]

Good article, and good point. Its part of a wider phenomenon that people are interested not in news, but in stories. It's why pretty blonde girls going missing stories run for months, and why messy complex civil wars in Africa go unreported. If you can't make a simple movie plot type story out of it, people aren't interested.

Getting back to the original point, as I've said before, even if terrorists WERE taking photos of potential targets, surely they'd be using phone cams? It's a way of reassuring the public because Mr & Mrs Daily Mail Reader insist that "something has to be done".

[loz]

I am not inciting civil unrest, but perhaps we should play "them" at their own game.

Simply report everyone you see with a camera to the police as suspicious. Surely anyone taking pictures of London landmarks could be using them in terrorist plots, hence you must report everyone...

The police would pretty soon get fed up and start saying "please, don't report photographers".

[springtide]

This was also interesting....

Bureau of Freelance Photographers launch Blue Card

Photographers get the blue card - The Bureau of Freelance Photographers (BFP) are taking action to protect photographers’ rights with the launch of the BFP Blue Card.

Press Release:
As more than 200 MPs put their signatures to Austin Mitchell’s Early Day Motion condemning police harassment of photographers in public places, the Bureau of Freelance Photographers (BFP) are launching a major initiative in an attempt to tackle the problem on the ground.

As part of its campaign for photographers’ rights, every UK member is being issued with the BFP Blue Card – a card that asserts photographers’ rights to take pictures in public places.

The card, which is enclosed with the June issue of the BFP’s monthly Market Newsletter, may help members who find themselves being stopped from taking pictures in public places. In such circumstances, the Bureau feels that members may find it useful to show the card to the particular police officer, security guard or other official.

The card is written in simple language; it is short and to the point and has been legally validated. It is small enough to be slipped into a camera bag or pocket. But will it work? Will the card have the desired effect?

BFP chief executive John Tracy says: “With the increasing number of members being stopped by police officers – or more commonly, police community support officers – from legitimately taking pictures, we felt we had to do something. We have written to the police, we have lobbied MPs, but ultimately, whether a photographer is prevented from taking pictures, is down to the individual officer on the ground. We feel that the card, if used with tact and discretion, may have the desired effect of emphasising to an officer the fact that photography in public places is a legitimate and, in 99 cases out of 100, legal activity.”

The organisation are asking members to report back on their experiences of using the card – whether positive or negative. John Tracy adds: “We will report on these experiences through the Newsletter and if the majority of members find that the card does help, all well and good. If, on the other hand, the majority find it doesn’t work, or even exacerbates the situation, we will report that too."

“But personally, I don’t think the latter will be the case. I think it’s more likely that, in some circumstances, members will find the card helpful and, in other circumstances, they won’t.”

Meanwhile, the BFP campaign continues. We hope to be part of a delegation being put together by Austin Mitchell to see Home Office minister Tony McNulty to urge that clear instructions be issued to make it clear that there is a right to take photographs in public places.

For further information about BFP membership, visit the website:
http://www.thebfp.co.uk/