AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

Bridge v's D-SLR

Post Reply
Old 04-02-2008, 11:49 AM   #1
Ex Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Experience Points:
785, Level: 6
Points: 785, Level: 6 Points: 785, Level: 6 Points: 785, Level: 6
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 62, Got 25
Posts: 521
Bridge v's D-SLR

Hi all.
Need some advice here.
I own a Canon 400D and various lenses, which doesn't get used much these days, so I'm thinking of selling it and getting a decent bridge.

Trouble is, I'll miss the quality of the 400D, so was wondering which bridge cam is going to be best in terms of quality for me.
I know nothing will be D-SLR quality......

Any idea's?

Thanks, Andy
  Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 12:05 PM   #2
Conspicuous Member
 
pixelpixel's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Belfast
Experience Points:
24,034, Level: 37
Points: 24,034, Level: 37 Points: 24,034, Level: 37 Points: 24,034, Level: 37
Activity: 35.2%
Activity: 35.2% Activity: 35.2% Activity: 35.2%
Thanks: Gave 1,617, Got 1,181
Posts: 9,853
Re: Bridge v's D-SLR

I am a bridge owner and I am looking to go the other way shortly I have a Sony dsc-h7.

I think the Canon G9 is what your looking for. One of the forum members has one, have a look at his flick site

Update: Just seen this
  Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 1:13 PM   #3
Ex Member
 
Pirate!!'s Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Liverpool
Experience Points:
22,390, Level: 36
Points: 22,390, Level: 36 Points: 22,390, Level: 36 Points: 22,390, Level: 36
Activity: 23.1%
Activity: 23.1% Activity: 23.1% Activity: 23.1%
Thanks: Gave 523, Got 1,253
Posts: 7,727
Re: Bridge v's D-SLR

Tough choice, but the leader of the pack is still the Panasonic DMC-FZ50. However, IF you can find one, look for the Sony DSC-R1. No longer made, it was (and still is) a class leader in the bridge/prosumer sector.

The problem was simply Sony priced it too high, so you could by an entry level dSLR for less. Anyway, that's history. I'm looking for one at the moment to replace my FZ3.
  Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 1:46 PM   #4
loz loz is offline
Conspicuous Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Experience Points:
30,195, Level: 42
Points: 30,195, Level: 42 Points: 30,195, Level: 42 Points: 30,195, Level: 42
Activity: 6.1%
Activity: 6.1% Activity: 6.1% Activity: 6.1%
Thanks: Gave 281, Got 815
Posts: 9,286
Re: Bridge v's D-SLR

I wouldn't say the FZ50 was the leader PQ wise.
It is a great all rounder with a fine telephoto.
But the small sensor packs in too many pixels and noise raises its head very early on. Combined with aggressive noise reduction it led to poorer PQ above ISO100

Looks for the replacement from Panasonic though, as they have acknowledged its weakneses and promise the next generation won't suffer.

PQ wise, the new Fuji S100FS sounds good as they fitted it with a larger sensor than normal in order to combate noise.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0801/08...ujifS100FS.asp
Quote:
Either way - on paper at least - this is one of the more promising cameras we've seen thus far in the build up to PMA, and we'll be interested to see how it performs in the real world; noise and the lack of dynamic range are the two most common issues facing current small-sensor models.
The daddy was the Sony R1 with a proper APS-C CMOS sensor. A lot of people are longing for Sony to introduce a replacement for it...
  Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 2:32 PM   #5
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Experience Points:
3,345, Level: 13
Points: 3,345, Level: 13 Points: 3,345, Level: 13 Points: 3,345, Level: 13
Activity: 3.4%
Activity: 3.4% Activity: 3.4% Activity: 3.4%
Thanks: Gave 111, Got 107
Posts: 512
Re: Bridge v's D-SLR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pirate!! View Post
However, IF you can find one, look for the Sony DSC-R1. No longer made, it was (and still is) a class leader in the bridge/prosumer sector.
That's interesting, as I'm also considering seeing if I can pick up an R1 as a first digital camera whilst waiting for the EOS 5D to be updated.
  Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 2:41 PM   #6
loz loz is offline
Conspicuous Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Experience Points:
30,195, Level: 42
Points: 30,195, Level: 42 Points: 30,195, Level: 42 Points: 30,195, Level: 42
Activity: 6.1%
Activity: 6.1% Activity: 6.1% Activity: 6.1%
Thanks: Gave 281, Got 815
Posts: 9,286
Re: Bridge v's D-SLR

Quote:
Originally Posted by loz View Post
IPQ wise, the new Fuji S100FS sounds good as they fitted it with a larger sensor than normal in order to combate noise

Mind you, this hands-on might put you off
http://gizmodo.com/350970/hands-on-f...-faux-dslr-why

As they say, if you are going to buy something as big and expensive as a DSLR, then why not buy a DSLR...
  Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 4:16 PM   #7
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Experience Points:
3,345, Level: 13
Points: 3,345, Level: 13 Points: 3,345, Level: 13 Points: 3,345, Level: 13
Activity: 3.4%
Activity: 3.4% Activity: 3.4% Activity: 3.4%
Thanks: Gave 111, Got 107
Posts: 512
Re: Bridge v's D-SLR

Quote:
Originally Posted by loz View Post
As they say, if you are going to buy something as big and expensive as a DSLR, then why not buy a DSLR...
I guess the S100FS could be ideal if you don't want to bother with interchangeable lenses and the dust issue. It sounds possible that it could be a step up from some of the physically smaller superzooms in terms of image quality. I think Gizmodo also made it look bigger by zooming the lens out to maximum length and attaching the hood for all their photos.
  Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 5:17 PM   #8
loz loz is offline
Conspicuous Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Experience Points:
30,195, Level: 42
Points: 30,195, Level: 42 Points: 30,195, Level: 42 Points: 30,195, Level: 42
Activity: 6.1%
Activity: 6.1% Activity: 6.1% Activity: 6.1%
Thanks: Gave 281, Got 815
Posts: 9,286
Re: Bridge v's D-SLR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habanero View Post
I guess the S100FS could be ideal if you don't want to bother with interchangeable lenses and the dust issue. It sounds possible that it could be a step up from some of the physically smaller superzooms in terms of image quality. I think Gizmodo also made it look bigger by zooming the lens out to maximum length and attaching the hood for all their photos.
And of course there aren't many DSLR 28-400mm F2.8/5.0 lenses.
And if there were, they would be a lot bigger than the S100FS's.

Equally, find a DSLR that also takes movies.

So it isn't all as negative as gizmodo would have. But I agree with them that it is still a bit big though compared to other bridge cameras.

But it could be an ideal walk about camera if the PQ is as good as they claim.

The other negative I saw but I couldn't find any confirmation of was that it only has a "dumb" hotshoe for an external flash, which would be disappointing.
  Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 12:20 PM   #9
Ex Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Experience Points:
785, Level: 6
Points: 785, Level: 6 Points: 785, Level: 6 Points: 785, Level: 6
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 62, Got 25
Posts: 521
Re: Bridge v's D-SLR

Thanks for your input guys

That new Fuji looks like just what I'm after.
All I can find is a release date of March 08.
I wonder if that USA or here or both?
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off