Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon @ Convergent AV I also entered this one in the print competition on Monday. I was really pround of it. It had no direct political intention but it was a comment on society and the way we treat the homeless and mentally ill...and how the way we treat folk affects the way they behave and think. The shot was heavily processed in the end to make it unsettling to look at as it's subject is uncomfortable. I named it Sign of the Times. We had been told that naming of prints or slides is important as it informs the judge of your intention with the image. The judge on Monday saw the picture (printed out A3 size) and gave it nice comments about seeing something out of the ordinary and that it was well spotted. He also thought it wasn't a pleasant image to view....and that it was probably lit by flash or headlights....he failed completely to read the signs and to work out what they said. He thought it was a picure of a rubbish tip. I still got a good mark....but I felt dejected that the purpose of the work was missed. |
This is the beauty of the clubs. We could have discussed your shots for ages after the pub, seriously and to take the **** (artist), but at the end of the day, it was a good shot, that probaby deserved a bit more (at least a 9), but the judge missed the message, and gave a slightly different opinion to it that you had intended.
Was it a Freudian slip when he started off saying "This photo is rubbish", it was his little joke.
And a picutrue of an out of focus Dragonfly getting the same mark !!!!! very subjective views i feel.
It does make for a good conversation though.