AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

CF card format query

Post Reply
Old 20-03-2006, 7:56 AM   #1
Tumbletown
Guest
Posts: n/a
CF card format query

I have a new Canon EOS 20D with SanDisk 1.0GB Ultra II CF card. After taking a few experimental shots I re-formatted the card via the camera and now the INFO panel on the camera tells me the card's volume is only 964Mb. Of course my total picture taking capacity has dropped from about 270 to 239 as a reduction of the 40 Megs or so. Is this a fault with the card or is it normal? Some advice would be much appreciated.

Thanks

Adrian
  Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 9:10 AM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Devon, Sussex or somewhere inbetween.
Experience Points:
7,818, Level: 21
Points: 7,818, Level: 21 Points: 7,818, Level: 21 Points: 7,818, Level: 21
Activity: 4.8%
Activity: 4.8% Activity: 4.8% Activity: 4.8%
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 577
Posts: 2,383
Often new cf cards will come with some bundled software saved onto the card. You wont be able to see it on the camera and you can probably only get at it if you use a card reader instad of using the camera's USB connection but that would be my guess for the reduced storage space.
  Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 9:15 AM   #3
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hull
Experience Points:
4,576, Level: 16
Points: 4,576, Level: 16 Points: 4,576, Level: 16 Points: 4,576, Level: 16
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 35, Got 29
Posts: 185
What Tumbletown said....

I might add that with some Sandisk cards, you get a free "file recovery" utility on the card ("File Rescue" or some such name), which could prove VERY useful if you ever have an "accident" with your CF cards, so you might want to check for it using a card reader.
  Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 9:20 AM   #4
Moderator
 
Zone's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Barnsley
Experience Points:
43,109, Level: 50
Points: 43,109, Level: 50 Points: 43,109, Level: 50 Points: 43,109, Level: 50
Activity: 8.3%
Activity: 8.3% Activity: 8.3% Activity: 8.3%
Thanks: Gave 490, Got 900
Posts: 5,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbletown
Of course my total picture taking capacity has dropped from about 270 to 239 as a reduction of the 40 Megs or so.
I'd also check at what quality you have your (presumably) jpeg settings set at as Large/Fine equates to 3.6MB per capture according to steves digicams.
  Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 11:12 AM   #5
Tumbletown
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thank you all for your replies. I've just been contacted by a colleague who has directed me to several web sites about this 'problem'. It appears to be simply the difference between card manufacturers specs (1MB = 1,000,000 bytes) while operating systems use the binary system (1MB = 1,048,576 Bytes). Also the unformatted capacity and formatted capacity are different due to the way the latter is calculated by cylinders/heads/sectors and bytes per track. All interesting stuff but at least I don't have a fault!
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off