 | | |
22-04-2005, 6:26 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 1,703
Thanks: Gave 26, Got 44 | A Couple More 'Hot' 100-400 L Pictures.....
Two more from the 'ol 100-400 L taken today.
Difficult lighting with a diffuse cloud layer....
First, a Wonky Landing,
Second, Michael Howard Tory leader leaving Cranfield in the campaign chopper after visiting Milton Keynes this afternoon...
You won't see it in this reduced image, but he's looking out of the rear window...
Last edited by Johndm; 19-08-2005 at 11:46 PM.
|
| |
25-04-2005, 9:15 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Guest |
Helicopter could have done with a longer exposure so you are not freezing the rotors.
| |
| |
25-04-2005, 9:21 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 576
Thanks: Gave 3, Got 63 |
I quite like as is... perceptible movement...not complete frozen, not a blur.
|
| |
25-04-2005, 10:33 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Ex Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 953
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Johndm Second, Michael Howard Tory leader leaving Cranfield in the campaign chopper after visiting Milton Keynes this afternoon...
You won't see it in this reduced image, but he's looking out of the rear window... | he's looking out the window thinking "Jesus that guys pointing a bazooka at us  " ....
Very sharp shots.
|
| |
25-04-2005, 1:51 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Guest | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tyefi I quite like as is... perceptible movement...not complete frozen, not a blur. | It just looks to me like it's suspended from a crane. There's not enough sense of dynamic for my liking.
| |
| |
25-04-2005, 6:22 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 1,703
Thanks: Gave 26, Got 44 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DJW he's looking out the window thinking "Jesus that guys pointing a bazooka at us  " ....
Very sharp shots. | LOL....
I seem to get far more anxious looks from pilots these days...
It seems the White Drainpipe is much more noticable from the air than my old skinny black job.. |
| |
25-04-2005, 6:33 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 1,703
Thanks: Gave 26, Got 44 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by mighty_boosh Helicopter could have done with a longer exposure so you are not freezing the rotors. | Ahhh.....a new aviation photog specialist?
As I said, these were under difficult conditions, as the hazy cloud plays all sorts of havoc with exposure, as it acts like a massive diffuser.
Needed to be up at 1/500th, as lens was at max 640mm zoom. Was experimenting to see what aperture resulted with Exposure Compensation +2/3, ISO upped to 200.
Exif below...
Have a look here if you like aircraft...... http://www.airliners.net/search/phot...nct_entry=true
File Name
IMG_5792.JPG
Camera Model
Canon EOS 300D DIGITAL
Shooting Date/Time
22/04/2005 16:42:12
Shooting Mode
Shutter-Priority AE
Tv( Shutter Speed )
1/500
Av( Aperture Value )
10
Metering Mode
Evaluative Metering
Exposure Compensation
+2/3
ISO Speed
200
Lens
100.0 - 400.0 mm
Focal Length
400.0 mm
Image Size
3072x2048
Image Quality
Fine
Flash
Off
White Balance Mode
Auto
AF Mode
AI Focus AF
Parameters Settings
Contrast Mid. High
Sharpness Mid. High
Color saturation Mid. High
Color tone 0
Color Space
sRGB
File Size
1695 KB
Drive Mode
Continuous shooting
Regards
|
| |
25-04-2005, 7:45 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Guest | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Johndm Ahhh.....a new aviation photog specialist? | Not really a specialist, just enjoy photography. I've recently been able to afford a DSLR, up to now I've been film except for my digital compact.
I think it may have been possible to get away with stopping the shutter down to 1/320 with an apperture of f8. I know the rule of thumb is shutter speed greater than focal length to avoid camera shake, but I have regularly gotten away with 1/200 at 300mm. I'm not sure whether it is correct or not to take the 1.6 factor into account when using that rule, so 1/320 won't be that far off at 400mm.
| |
| |
25-04-2005, 7:57 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: jewellery Quarter, Birmingham
Posts: 375
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 5 |
I think the first pilot is drunk and like the second shot, but agree it could have done with some extra dynamism ideally. Super sharp tho'.
|
| |
25-04-2005, 8:09 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,040
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22 |
Tory leader?????
the second shot could really have done with a fireball (the tory-choper) making contact with the blair filled labour bus, NOW THAT WOULD BE A SHOT AND A HALF!
bet you howard would still be moaning about blair lying, and tony blair would be real pissy cuz yet another person had mentioned the war....
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..
Thanks
|
| |
25-04-2005, 8:18 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: jewellery Quarter, Birmingham
Posts: 375
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 5 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by mr jones the second shot could really have done with a fireball (the tory-choper) making contact with the blair filled labour bus, NOW THAT WOULD BE A SHOT AND A HALF! | Have you been celebrating PNE in the play offs already  still a point to get!!!
|
| |
25-04-2005, 9:01 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 1,703
Thanks: Gave 26, Got 44 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by mighty_boosh Not really a specialist, just enjoy photography. I've recently been able to afford a DSLR, up to now I've been film except for my digital compact.
I think it may have been possible to get away with stopping the shutter down to 1/320 with an apperture of f8. I know the rule of thumb is shutter speed greater than focal length to avoid camera shake, but I have regularly gotten away with 1/200 at 300mm. I'm not sure whether it is correct or not to take the 1.6 factor into account when using that rule, so 1/320 won't be that far off at 400mm. | Panning needs to be spot on perfect to get a good amount of keepers at 1/320, although IS does do a good job sometimes...still need to be smooth though..
1.6 crop needs to be added, so I'm panning at 640mm with the chopper shot, even with IS, 1/320 is gonna be risky, especially as I wanted the shot, so 1/500 gave me a dead cert.
I'll be at Old Warden next Sunday, the display line will be much closer, so will be attempting to get the Spitfire in flight at 1/90 while panning.....IS on of course. |
| |
25-04-2005, 9:02 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,040
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22 |
PNE? oh yeh thats football, not interested in footy at all
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..
Thanks
|
| |
25-04-2005, 10:26 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Guest | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Johndm 1.6 crop needs to be added, so I'm panning at 640mm with the chopper shot, even with IS, 1/320 is gonna be risky, especially as I wanted the shot, so 1/500 gave me a dead cert. | I'm really not sure you need to take into account the 1.6 crop because it is not changing the properties of the lens, it's as if you were taking a full frame image and just ignoring the outer edges - the amount of shake will be unchanged.
| |
| |
26-04-2005, 7:16 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 576
Thanks: Gave 3, Got 63 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by mighty_boosh I'm really not sure you need to take into account the 1.6 crop because it is not changing the properties of the lens, it's as if you were taking a full frame image and just ignoring the outer edges - the amount of shake will be unchanged. | I always figured the 1/focal length guide was based around noticeable "shake" for a given field of view. And that as such you'd probably want to use 35mm equivalent focal lengths to preserve the rule, as moving to the smaller sensor you'd effectively narrowed the fov?
Anyway i agree the 1/focal length guide is just that a rough guide.
|
| | | |