 | |
13-01-2009, 9:19 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 167
Thanks: Gave 65, Got 18 | A Question....
Will a 10 Meg camera only take 10 Meg photos if the lighting etc is right to do so ?
|
| |
13-01-2009, 9:30 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,996
Thanks: Gave 617, Got 895 | Re: A Question....
Will take a 10 meg picture whenever you click the shutter regardless of conditions
__________________
Panasonic TH50PX60,Nikon D300 & 12-24 DX, tamron 17-50 & 90mm 2.8, 70-300mm VR, Epson stylus pro 9800 printer.
|
| |
13-01-2009, 9:32 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,469
Thanks: Gave 35, Got 535 | Re: A Question.... Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Harry Will a 10 Meg camera only take 10 Meg photos if the lighting etc is right to do so ? | Actually, that's quite an interesting question. If you don't have enough light, you need to turn up the sensor sensitivity (either manually or automatically), and this increases sensor 'noise' (random dots). You can't really see this noise too much unless you start looking at the image up close, so what this means is you can't print the image very large, and you can't crop it heavily. It's effectively a 'lower megapixel' image, because although it's still a 10MP image, it's fuzzy if you view it up close.
So, there is a big difference 10 million pixels, and 10 million USABLE pixels. So, when choosing a camera, high ISO performance is becoming more important than pixel count.
|
| |
13-01-2009, 10:08 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Burnham, Bucks
Posts: 241
Thanks: Gave 20, Got 63 | Re: A Question.... Don’t confuse the number of pixels of the camera’s light-sensitive screen with the size of the pictures which are stored on the memory card. The 10 million pixels on the screen are compressed by the camera into a JPEG file whose size depends on what you have told it to use: high, medium or low compression, say. The higher the compression, the lower the underlying resolution. On my 10Meg 400D, a 2gb card will hold about 440 low, 766 medium or 1350 high compression images. Uncompressed, it would hold about 50. To answer your question, from one point of view the camera always takes 10 Meg pictures; from another point of view it never does. The ambient conditions are largely irrelevant (but see Yandros’ comment). |
| |
13-01-2009, 4:57 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 167
Thanks: Gave 65, Got 18 | Re: A Question....
Yeah well im getting roughly 4 meg photos with it being set on 10 meg |
| |
13-01-2009, 5:07 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: London
Posts: 626
Thanks: Gave 12, Got 74 | Re: A Question....
Are you saying you get 4 MegaByte pictures from 10 MegaPixel photos?
We refer both as "Meg", but they're completely different. The Meg just means "Million". As in millions of bytes, or millions of pixels.
MegaByte is the filesize on your computer.
MegaPixel is the number of pixels the camera sensor uses (For example a 1600x1200 is 1600x1200/1000000=2 So this would be 2 million pixels, or 2 MegaPixels).
|
| |
13-01-2009, 5:15 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 167
Thanks: Gave 65, Got 18 | Re: A Question....
Yes i am.
So its all good the way it is ?
|
| |
13-01-2009, 5:28 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,469
Thanks: Gave 35, Got 535 | Re: A Question.... Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Harry Yes i am.
So its all good the way it is ? | Yes. jpg files are compressed, so about 4Mb is about right.
|
| |
13-01-2009, 5:59 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: London
Posts: 626
Thanks: Gave 12, Got 74 | Re: A Question....
It's fine.
You'll actually notice that simple pictures (big uniform blocks of colour, not much texture etc) will have smaller filesizes, and very complex pictures will have larger file sizes.
All of them will still be 10 MegaPixel though.
|
| |
13-01-2009, 6:03 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 167
Thanks: Gave 65, Got 18 | Re: A Question....
Thanks guys
Out of interest, does the black tint on the outside of some photos just mean a lack of light ? I just use Intelligent Auto on my Lumix.
|
| |
13-01-2009, 6:09 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,996
Thanks: Gave 617, Got 895 | Re: A Question.... Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Harry Thanks guys
Out of interest, does the black tint on the outside of some photos just mean a lack of light ? I just use Intelligent Auto on my Lumix. | I think your referring to a vignette (could be wrong). Most lenses cause a picture to get darker in the corners of images it's easily fixed in photoshop afterwards.
__________________
Panasonic TH50PX60,Nikon D300 & 12-24 DX, tamron 17-50 & 90mm 2.8, 70-300mm VR, Epson stylus pro 9800 printer.
|
| |
13-01-2009, 6:11 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,469
Thanks: Gave 35, Got 535 | Re: A Question.... Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Harry Thanks guys
Out of interest, does the black tint on the outside of some photos just mean a lack of light ? I just use Intelligent Auto on my Lumix. | I think what you're describing is vignetting. All lenses do it to some extent. Vignetting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
| | | |