 | |
28-11-2008, 4:09 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Scotland
Posts: 55
Thanks: Gave 25, Got 0 | Sony Alpah A200 or a Cannon EOS 20D
Hi all
I want to get a DSLR i have a budget of £300
I am interested in the Cannon EOS 20D with a 18-55 IS lens which can be picked up between £250-£300
Or a
Sony Alpha A200 for £250 from Argos
Which one offers the best IQ and is good at high ISO
thanks
Last edited by senu; 28-11-2008 at 4:42 PM.
Reason: Thread tidy
|
| |
28-11-2008, 5:13 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Merseyside
Posts: 4,596
Thanks: Gave 373, Got 733 | Re: Sony Alpah A200 or a Cannon EOS 20D
Arguably, the Canon will have better high ISO than Sony . . . that said it will depend on your requirements and shooting style. If you have an f/1.7 or so 50mm for example, the ISO issue doesn't come into play so much due to the wide aperture, so lower ISOs can be used.
I'm sure you can get a better deal on the A200 than Argos though! Have you trawled EvilBay?
|
| |
29-11-2008, 6:12 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 | Re: Sony Alpah A200 or a Cannon EOS 20D
Get a newr Canon 40D - around $700 (refurb?) B&H.
Paying for old camera technology is a losing game, and poor investment if you ever decide to move forward. I have old cameras, and sooner, rather than later, their results will disappoint you. Canon has a better 'system', you can buy older autofocus and manual lenses off ebay. Only do business with 99.5% and better rated people. Take into account 50,000 sales and 99.5% is different from 500 sales and 99.5%. I have about 900 succesful transactions, that's what i base my advice on.
Buy decent lenses also, whatever you can afford. A 18-400 might be only $300, but you'll have terrible optics and major distortion, a waste of money. Try Kenrockwell for reviews.
|
| |
30-11-2008, 5:06 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Scotland
Posts: 55
Thanks: Gave 25, Got 0 | Re: Sony Alpah A200 or a Cannon EOS 20D Quote:
Originally Posted by maclove Get a newr Canon 40D - around $700 (refurb?) B&H.
Paying for old camera technology is a losing game, and poor investment if you ever decide to move forward. I have old cameras, and sooner, rather than later, their results will disappoint you. Canon has a better 'system', you can buy older autofocus and manual lenses off ebay. Only do business with 99.5% and better rated people. Take into account 50,000 sales and 99.5% is different from 500 sales and 99.5%. I have about 900 succesful transactions, that's what i base my advice on.
Buy decent lenses also, whatever you can afford. A 18-400 might be only $300, but you'll have terrible optics and major distortion, a waste of money. Try Kenrockwell for reviews. | The EOS 40D is expensive in the UK at the moment £750 (17-85 USM IS Lens) even second hand prices are £600+
My budget is only £300 the which gives me 3 choices Nikon 40, Sony a200 or the EOS 20D |
| |
30-11-2008, 6:20 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Leeds..out of Prescot
Posts: 1,765
Thanks: Gave 248, Got 531 | Re: Sony Alpah A200 or a Cannon EOS 20D
I have the 30D which I believe was only a marginal upgrade from the 20D. Bigger screen and addition of spot metering (which I hardly ever have used) are the main differences I noticed looking at the spec on dpreview.
I've had my 30D for around 3 years now and still absolutely love it. Got the Tamron 17-50 this year and it gave it a new lease of life. As has my constant learning. The camera has done what I hoped, that is allow me to grow with it and still gives me superb results when I'm on the ball. One of the nicest things about it is that it feels like a step up from the more basic models just because of the controls if nowt else. Very easy to adjust everything on the fly. All in, a very rewarding camera to use. Sure there are features on the newer models which would be nice, and I sure as hell can't afford to upgrade anyway, but the 30D still does plenty so well that it means I don't have a great need to upgrade at all.
On that basis I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the 20D if you can get one. TBH you may even be lucky enough to find a 2nd hand 30D for not much more than your budget. Though considering the (lack of) differences between the two, I'd just get whichever you find first.
__________________
James. Ignore my member status. I'm not old and know very little. I'm just very opinionated and lonely. Canon 30D, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Canon 28-105 3.5-4.5 USM II, Sigma EX 70-200 2.8 APO DG Macro flickr |
| | | |