Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Digital Photography General Chat

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7 Black
Canon EOS 450D Black
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 Black
Canon PowerShot A480 Silver
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7 Black 
Canon EOS 450D Black 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 Black 
Canon PowerShot A480 Silver 
Canon EOS 500D Black + 18-55mm Lens Kit 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 Black 
Canon EOS 500D Black 
Canon EOS 1000D Black + 18-55mm Lens ... 
Nikon D90 Black 
Canon Digital IXUS 100 IS Silver 
 More...Prices updated November 22nd at 8:30am and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2007, 11:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fleet, Hampshire
Posts: 705
Thanks: Gave 340, Got 210
The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Evening all,

Spent a fantastic day at the Hawk Conservancy Trust near Andover in Hampshire today. It was a beautiful clear day which made for a very relaxing time as well as a burnt face and lots of blown highlights! Oh well. It was great fun all the same.

Anyway, here are the images that I've loaded onto my Flickr:

1. Intense


2. Eagle Eyes


3. African Fish Eagle


4. Bald Eagle


5. Incoming Owl


6. Landed Owl


7. Hunting Owl


8. Claws


9. Secretary


10. Mind the Rocks


11. Bright Out


12. Tawny Owl


13. Eye of the Owl


14. African Fish Eagle Claws


15. African Fish Eagle Soaring


16. Majestic


17. Final Approach


18. Successful Landing


19. Deserved Reward


20. Damn


I am absolutely gutted about number 20! Missed focus and not enough DOF to save me. Oh well, I'll learn for next time ... maybe.

Lots of images but C&C welcomed and appreciated if you feel like it on any of them.

Cheers.
__________________
Keith
5DII + BG-E6 | 17-40 f4 | 24-70 f2.8 | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8 IS | 100 f2.8 Macro | 135 f2 | 580EXII | 430EXII | 2x430EX | ST-E2 | Manfrotto 055 MF4 & 322RC2
flickr
ksten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 7:44 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
PaulBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Surrey UK
Posts: 1,629
Thanks: Gave 51, Got 87
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Some beauties there - I've been there too its a great place to see birds of prey & they put on great shows!
Paul
__________________
"I can't complain but sometimes I still do - Life's been good to me so far"
Gadget List: AV - Denon Kef REL Pioneer Sky+
DSLR - Between cameras at the mo
For Sale:
PaulBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 8:21 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jomike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frimley, Surrey
Posts: 1,646
Thanks: Gave 309, Got 316
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

I really enjoyed the African Fish Eagle shots (pity about the last one being OOF). It brings back memories of camping in a place called Mtunzini on the KwaZulu Natal north coast in South Africa where there were a breeding pair of Fish Eagles. The sight and sound of these magnificent birds will always be with me. The call of the Fish Eagle is considered to be one of the distinctive sounds of the African bush.

Mike
__________________
Mike

My flickr
jomike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 9:21 AM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Puli's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: surrey
Posts: 227
Thanks: Gave 114, Got 61
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

There is some cracking good shots there. Pics of the flying Owl and the Eagles eyes are the best for me.

What sort of PP work did you do on the Eagles eyes to get them so clear?...(If any of course!!)

I know what you mean about the last one but the rest are lovely. I did some a while back but none flying as it was too windy. There so Photogenic would like to go again when flying......

Paul.
Puli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 11:45 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Gizmo 76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Apps are Calling :-S
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: Gave 189, Got 205
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Some superb captures indeed, great work

Fav's out of all of them, in list form

#4 - Awesome pose, detail and lighting, yeah maybe a little blown out on the top of the head, but I still love the shot.

#3 & #6 - Just are quality shots, with very good composition and great detail.

#13 - Great close up which shows plenty of detail again!!

#18 - You obviously have done this a few times before Great timing and composition.

#17 - Really like the eagle is flying into the space on the right, so great composition, another thumbs up!

#19 - I'd like to see more of the trainer's hand, but once again still a cracking shot.


And the others not mention are by no means bad shots, all are very good.

Your PP'ing work is really well done, perfect sharpness, great colours, really enjoyed looking
__________________
Xbox Live Gamertag - Giz 76
R & P Design <-- MY NEW SITE - UPDATED 25/11/09
My Home Cinema Setup
Flickr
Gizmo 76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ruislip, London
Posts: 3,790
Thanks: Gave 1,025, Got 885
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Hi ya


Some very nice shots there. Really do like 3 & 6 out of the portrait ones, but 19 really stands out for me.


Cheers Holo
__________________
Canon 40d, Canon 400d, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, Canon 50mm f/1.8,Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8, Canon 100mm f/2 Sigma 100-300 f4 Canon 430EX Speedlite
Holowlegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 4:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fleet, Hampshire
Posts: 705
Thanks: Gave 340, Got 210
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Thanks for the comments everyone.

PaulBoy - yes, the shows were excellent and very entertaining.

Mike - you are very lucky to have seen these creatures in the wild. I've not been to a place like this before so was in awe of these birds. The flying demonstrations really showed their power and grace.

Puli - in answer to your question about the Eagle Eyes photograph, I generally have the same workflow with all my photographs but depending on the subject the extent to which I do things will vary. A summary is:

- I shoot everything in RAW.
- I use Canon DPP to browse the RAW files, selecting those which are my favourite and have a good chance at turning out well (I physically move these to a separate directory)
- I go through the selected files, change the white balance if necessary, set the picture style to faithful, leave colour tone at 0, usually increase saturation up a couple of steps, set sharpness to 0 then adjust the exposure if necessary (By eye and using the histogram).
- Then I transfer to photoshop.
- If necessary I use Noise Ninja to reduce noise whilst trying to maintain sharpness (no sharpening is done yet though).
- At this point I may crop the image if necessary. I genearlly keep a 3:2 to match the uncropped aspect ratio, but I have done the occasional square crop too.
- I may clone / heal any blemishes (e.g. sensor dirt etc).
- I look at levels and curves to see if I would like to change anything. Generally I do as the faithful picture style usually looks pretty flat.
- I may dodge and burn areas of the image (E.g. the pupils and catchlights).
- Depending upon the image I may selectively lift the curves in any dark portions (In this example, this is what I did for the Eagle Eyes).
- The dodging and curves adjustments sometimes pushes the colour saturation too far so, again for the eagle eyes, I selectively reduced the saturation of the eyes as they looked too red even though they were bloodshot.
- When I'm happy with the colour balance, saturation, brightness and contrast of the image I will finally apply some USM as no in camera sharpening had been done. Again, this may be selectively done - e.g. around the eyes.
- Finally, I change to 8-bit mode and save as level 12 JPG before uploading to flickr.

That looks like a lot now I've gone through it all but I actually think that the major task in the whole workflow is going through all the images and deciding which ones to leave and which ones to PP. Most images are then processed in a few minutes although some difficult ones I can spend much longer on! For now I enjoy the PP as much as making the photographs so I'm happy to spend time in front of my computer.

Gizmo - I don't know about having done this a few times before! I just made extensive use of the continuous drive on my camera! The eagle was really pleased with itself having landed on the glove successfully and let out a loud and triumphant call to much applause from the audience!

Holo - thanks for the comments. It means a lot coming from the master of bird photography!

Before I go, a final couple from the day:

21. Returning Harris Hawk


22. Harris Hawk


Cheers.
__________________
Keith
5DII + BG-E6 | 17-40 f4 | 24-70 f2.8 | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8 IS | 100 f2.8 Macro | 135 f2 | 580EXII | 430EXII | 2x430EX | ST-E2 | Manfrotto 055 MF4 & 322RC2
flickr
ksten is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks from:
Puli (04-06-2007)
Old 03-06-2007, 7:16 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: BHX
Posts: 61
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 10
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Keith,
They are all good shots. No 19 is a fab image for me. I personally think that you got the crop right otherwise your eye may wander to keeper's hand.
What lens did you use?

dingle
dingle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 7:59 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fleet, Hampshire
Posts: 705
Thanks: Gave 340, Got 210
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Thanks Dingle.

The lens was a Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM.

Cheers.
__________________
Keith
5DII + BG-E6 | 17-40 f4 | 24-70 f2.8 | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8 IS | 100 f2.8 Macro | 135 f2 | 580EXII | 430EXII | 2x430EX | ST-E2 | Manfrotto 055 MF4 & 322RC2
flickr
ksten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 8:20 PM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
Posts: 14,225
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 2,078
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Very impressive collection.. even the one that got away!

Im sure you know DPP has noise reduction which seems to work well on the Canon RAW files without softening.
However since you have Ninja .. why not use it
The colour tone from #14-18 seems a bit different ( in a nice way) to those before and after.. Do you stick to "faithful" in camera or DPP?

Altogether very accomplished (IMO) birds always seem to move too fast for me
However I suspect it would be much harder if the lens didnt have IS
__________________
S3Stuff


Opinions expressed by myself are not necessarily those of AV Forums..or even mine!

Last edited by senu; 03-06-2007 at 8:22 PM.
senu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 8:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
Liquid101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aberystwyth
Posts: 4,114
Thanks: Gave 329, Got 1,159
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Nice work.

I think the close up portrait shots work well. Very intense.

I actually quite like No 20. I can't put my finger on why exactly. Perhaps because the spot just in front of the eagle is sharp, suggests that there is something waiting to be caught.

Anyway, nice work. You've handled the moving targets and focussing very nicely indeed
__________________
flickr
Liquid101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 8:41 PM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fleet, Hampshire
Posts: 705
Thanks: Gave 340, Got 210
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Thanks Senu.

The different colour tones in those images were caused by my PP in Photoshop. I didn't do the same amount of burning and colour balance / saturation changes on all the photographs, hence the differences. In isolation I was happy with the skies but put next to each others the differences become obvious.

I used IS on the portrait shots but didn't on the birds in flight shots - not even in mode 2. Instead I opted for pushing the ISO and ensuring that the shutter speed was sufficient to remove any camera shake. The reason for this was that the birds were often coming from unexpected directions (especially with multiple birds flying simultaneously) so I didn't have chance to do a nice pan most of the time.

Cheers.
__________________
Keith
5DII + BG-E6 | 17-40 f4 | 24-70 f2.8 | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8 IS | 100 f2.8 Macro | 135 f2 | 580EXII | 430EXII | 2x430EX | ST-E2 | Manfrotto 055 MF4 & 322RC2
flickr
ksten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 8:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fleet, Hampshire
Posts: 705
Thanks: Gave 340, Got 210
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Thanks Liquid. It was a fun day and would recommend it to anyone.

Cheers.
__________________
Keith
5DII + BG-E6 | 17-40 f4 | 24-70 f2.8 | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8 IS | 100 f2.8 Macro | 135 f2 | 580EXII | 430EXII | 2x430EX | ST-E2 | Manfrotto 055 MF4 & 322RC2
flickr
ksten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2007, 10:46 AM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Nike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: bournemouth, UK.
Posts: 651
Thanks: Gave 8, Got 17
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Lovely pics, I had already seen some of them on your flickr a/c.
I have Libertys Raptor Centre a stones throw from me; this has inspired me to revisit them with the new camera
__________________
Panny PWD7, Pio AX5ai-s, Pio 757ai, Panny E65, Tannoy 638/623/MXR/BK XLS-200.
Rega P3/Ortofon 540 MkII/MF X-LPS/X-PSU, MF X-Ray.


flickr
Nike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2007, 11:11 AM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fleet, Hampshire
Posts: 705
Thanks: Gave 340, Got 210
Re: The Hawk Conservancy Trust (56k warning)

Excellent, looking forward to seeing them when you've been.
__________________
Keith
5DII + BG-E6 | 17-40 f4 | 24-70 f2.8 | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8 IS | 100 f2.8 Macro | 135 f2 | 580EXII | 430EXII | 2x430EX | ST-E2 | Manfrotto 055 MF4 & 322RC2
flickr
ksten is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
56k, conservancy, hawk, trust, warning
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:39 AM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting