 | | |
01-08-2006, 4:19 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 76
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 8 |
That things huge
apparently there's only 10 in existance, weighs 16kg and has a price tag of approx $90k. Good old google :D
Regards
Steve
Last edited by Sound Fm; 01-08-2006 at 4:22 PM.
|
| |
01-08-2006, 4:22 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bromley
Posts: 1,990
Thanks: Gave 32, Got 145 |
when i first started working at Tecno (anyone remember them?) They had a couple of Canon lenses on the system for around 40k. I believe this 1200mm lens is around the same but dont hold me to that. I know there arent many in circulation so you arent likely to find it on froogle |
| |
01-08-2006, 4:30 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,069
Thanks: Gave 46, Got 116 |
That's certainly a beast of a lens! You'd probably need a small truck to carry the lens and the tripod for it
__________________ Canon 40d | Canon 24-105mm F4 L | Sigma 17-70mm | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Canon 50mm f1.4 | 430EX - (Flickr) Xbox 360 | Hitachi 28LD5200 | Humax 9200T | Onkyo 515 + Mordaunt Short 902i |
| |
01-08-2006, 6:04 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 784
Thanks: Gave 56, Got 51 |
you got that right, tripod is well chunky |
| |
01-08-2006, 6:37 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 1,707
Thanks: Gave 18, Got 43 |
I'm sure there's more than 10 in existence, although the last one i saw on the market did go for nearly $90,000 and i know they *used* to be built to order.
Rumour going round is that that they have stopped making it, but apparantly this is only because the last guy who wanted to buy one had to pull out of the sale due to a nasty divorce.
Oh the internet rumours....
Oh and the picture in the post above mine is actually a canon camcorder, and the converter for EF lenses automatically adds like another 7x to the equivalent 35mm focal length. What's he looking at!!
|
| |
01-08-2006, 7:11 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bromley
Posts: 1,990
Thanks: Gave 32, Got 145 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by SeaneyC
Oh and the picture in the post above mine is actually a canon camcorder, and the converter for EF lenses automatically adds like another 7x to the equivalent 35mm focal length. What's he looking at!! | Erm... can you possibly provide me with proof of that mate? The EF adaptor for the XL1 comes in at about £260 but doesnt multiply the focal length at all, they do however make a 1.6x converter. Not sure where you got 7x from surely that would be able to take photos of a man on the moon
|
| |
01-08-2006, 7:12 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 136
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 1 |
Leica do some big lenses too.. |
| |
01-08-2006, 7:47 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 1,707
Thanks: Gave 18, Got 43 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by ush flynn Erm... can you possibly provide me with proof of that mate? The EF adaptor for the XL1 comes in at about £260 but doesnt multiply the focal length at all, they do however make a 1.6x converter. Not sure where you got 7x from surely that would be able to take photos of a man on the moon | Well if i'm not mistaken, the sensor on the xl1 is like 1/3 or 1/4" isn't it?
Compared to 35mm this is about 6x unless i'm completely out?
|
| |
01-08-2006, 10:39 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,040
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by busterboy Leica do some big lenses too.. |
dont think much of the image quality thougH! that pick is clearly not taken with a leica is it!
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..
Thanks
|
| |
01-08-2006, 10:53 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,069
Thanks: Gave 46, Got 116 |
Holy smokes! Look at the size of the tripod head plate on the Leica lens!
__________________ Canon 40d | Canon 24-105mm F4 L | Sigma 17-70mm | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Canon 50mm f1.4 | 430EX - (Flickr) Xbox 360 | Hitachi 28LD5200 | Humax 9200T | Onkyo 515 + Mordaunt Short 902i |
| |
02-08-2006, 7:05 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: Gave 37, Got 175 |
LOL my 400 seems sooo small compared to those beasts LOL
__________________ w: www.randomphotos.net #: Canon 1D Mk III - Bunch of Lenses. Bag full of other stuff :# |
| |
02-08-2006, 7:54 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,811
Thanks: Gave 61, Got 113 |
1200mm...PAH!!!
Try 2000mm
2000mm f/11 Reflex-Nikkor
A prototype model of this remarkable lens was officially shown at Photokina in 1968 as this MirrorNikkor lens has the longest focal length - 2000mm - which ranked among the longest focal length of all telephoto lenses in 35mm SLR photography. The magnification is 40 times that of a normal 50mm lens, with an extrremely narrow angle of view 1° 10'. It is of the catadioptric type, with two mirrors and three lenses, which accounts for its fairly compact size. The lens barrel is 598mm long. The lens was supplied with a AY-1 mount which made the lens seemed more like a telescope when the lens is mounted onto it.
PS
"News just in"...it has managed to find the missing Beagle probe on "ur anus"...
__________________
AKA "fulabeer"
Last edited by Paul D; 02-08-2006 at 7:58 AM.
|
| |
02-08-2006, 9:23 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bromley
Posts: 1,990
Thanks: Gave 32, Got 145 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by SeaneyC Well if i'm not mistaken, the sensor on the xl1 is like 1/3 or 1/4" isn't it?
Compared to 35mm this is about 6x unless i'm completely out? | Ah tell you what your absolutley right! the xl1 had the bigger sensor of 1/3" and the xl2 had a smaller but denser sensor. The magnification on the XL lenses was around 1.1 to 1.3 but when using EOS lenses the magnification on the XL1 was 7.8x
Using it on this 1200mm lens would effectively make it into a telescope!
9360mm!! apparently they used them for surveilance
|
| |
02-08-2006, 10:06 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: Gave 37, Got 175 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by ush flynn 9360mm!! apparently they used them for surveilance |
Of what the moon  That would be one mad lense
__________________ w: www.randomphotos.net #: Canon 1D Mk III - Bunch of Lenses. Bag full of other stuff :# |
| | | |