 | | |
02-06-2006, 1:20 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,752
Thanks: Gave 637, Got 531 | Pentax ist DL & 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 lens
I am seriously considering a Pentax ist with kit lens for £370 at jessops, unless someone knows of a flaw?
Any views?
cheers
|
| |
02-06-2006, 1:38 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 572
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 34 |
It's an entry level DSLR, depends what you are looking for in a camera?
K.
|
| |
02-06-2006, 1:49 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,752
Thanks: Gave 637, Got 531 |
I have a panny fx9 at the moment so really an entry level would do fine.
Naturally the question of finances raises its head and I just need to confident its not a pup!
cheers
|
| |
02-06-2006, 2:19 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 572
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 34 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tontoshorse I have a panny fx9 at the moment so really an entry level would do fine.
Naturally the question of finances raises its head and I just need to confident its not a pup!
cheers | Important thing is lenses, you will be limited with 18-55 to general outdoor use. Just have a look at the prices of the lenses in the range you might end up using. Trips to the zoo or whatever and you will need 200mm or above for those long(ish) shots.
K.
|
| |
02-06-2006, 3:18 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Barnsley
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: Gave 347, Got 558 |
Lens mount is PK thats as old as the hills, therefore the choice of manual and AF lenses second hand is huge and good quality lenses can be picked up for relatively little
__________________ Si
AV Forums "Photo Competition" can be found HERE
Octobers's Photo Competition thumbnail Page HERE All opinions are mine! (unless I'm told otherwise) |
| |
02-06-2006, 3:35 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 572
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 34 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Zone Lens mount is PK thats as old as the hills, therefore the choice of manual and AF lenses second hand is huge and good quality lenses can be picked up for relatively little  | Also I think Specsavers are doing a 2for1 on Pentax lenses
K.
|
| |
02-06-2006, 3:58 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,752
Thanks: Gave 637, Got 531 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by kavster Also I think Specsavers are doing a 2for1 on Pentax lenses
K. | That'll be handy! Unless you're Pirate then you might get 4 for 2
many thanks for the comments.
|
| |
02-06-2006, 4:45 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 572
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 34 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tontoshorse That'll be handy! Unless you're Pirate then you might get 4 for 2
many thanks for the comments. | I jest mate, you will find plenty of quality lenses for it
K.
|
| |
02-07-2006, 10:41 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,752
Thanks: Gave 637, Got 531 |
Is the iso of 200 a bit limited though?
many thanks
|
| |
02-07-2006, 11:02 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Barnsley
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: Gave 347, Got 558 |
Nikons also start at iso 200 iirc, its simply how well does each respective camera's sensor handle the noise!
I've flashed (no jokes please) my 300d so it'll do iso3200, trust me, you'd only ever want to use it in an emergency, otherwise anything blown up past 6x4 looks like a picasso  350d will have less noise at iso1600 than my 300d at iso800; so really dont worry unduly over iso there are worse things to worry about
__________________ Si
AV Forums "Photo Competition" can be found HERE
Octobers's Photo Competition thumbnail Page HERE All opinions are mine! (unless I'm told otherwise) |
| |
03-07-2006, 2:22 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,752
Thanks: Gave 637, Got 531 |
Its now at £335 pay nowt for a year! read a review stating poor focusing in anything less than bright light - any views?
Main points re lenses is very true (a quick look on eb shows a huge range).
I just can't help thinking that I'll be disappointed with its performance, but its £120 quid cheaper than a 350D and an opportunity to aquire a lens or 2 for the same outlay.
Views much appreciated. |
| |
03-07-2006, 2:33 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,069
Thanks: Gave 46, Got 116 |
For 50 quid more, you can get the Nikon D50 with Kit Lens. It's usually between the Nikon and Canon cameras when people recommend them.
|
| |
03-07-2006, 2:44 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,752
Thanks: Gave 637, Got 531 |
trouble is I don't like the feel of the nikon, so thankfully its one less to consider!
|
| |
04-07-2006, 8:05 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,069
Thanks: Gave 46, Got 116 |
lol, fair enough
|
| |
04-07-2006, 9:09 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: Gave 37, Got 175 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tontoshorse Its now at £335 pay nowt for a year! read a review stating poor focusing in anything less than bright light - any views?
Main points re lenses is very true (a quick look on eb shows a huge range).
I just can't help thinking that I'll be disappointed with its performance, but its £120 quid cheaper than a 350D and an opportunity to aquire a lens or 2 for the same outlay.
Views much appreciated.  | I looked at the ISD before settling on the 350D as I have a few PK lenses kicking about. The thing is the spec of the 350D is alot better for a few £'s more so I plumped for that and haven't been disappointed yet
The range of new lenses is the same in that Sigma, Tamron etc all do lenses for both and you can get S/H lenses for both. The 18-55mm kit lense with the 350D is good as is the Sigma 70-200[?].
Best advice is to have a read of all the reviews, check the specs side by side and buy the best you can afford.
__________________ w: www.randomphotos.net #: Canon 1D Mk III - Bunch of Lenses. Bag full of other stuff :# |
| | | |