Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Digital Photography General Chat

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7 Black
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 Black
Canon EOS 450D Black
Canon PowerShot A480 Silver
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7 Black 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 Black 
Canon EOS 450D Black 
Canon PowerShot A480 Silver 
Canon EOS 500D Black + 18-55mm Lens Kit 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 Black 
Canon EOS 500D Black 
Canon EOS 1000D Black + 18-55mm Lens ... 
Nikon D90 Black 
Canon Digital IXUS 100 IS Silver 
 More...Prices updated November 23rd at 10:30pm and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-03-2006, 9:26 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
mutamist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hitchin
Posts: 544
Thanks: Gave 83, Got 36
Best Ulktra Zoom Camera - Sony, Panasonic or other?

At the moment I have a HP Photosmart R817 which is a nice little camera but I have no decided that being able to 'fit in my pocket' is not the top priority - I'd much rather have a digital camera with a decent optical zoom.

The two I have thought about are the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5. I was wondering what people thought was the better camera or if there are any others that are better than the both? These are 12x Optical Zoom cameras and are around the £250ish mark.

EDIT: add in the Canon PowerShot S2 and also the Panasonic FZ7 - though that's more expensive, I think!

many thanks
__________________
Wax On, Wax Off - Blog - - - - flickr - - - - Fable Photos

Last edited by mutamist; 19-03-2006 at 11:20 AM.
mutamist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 4:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 140
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 5
I think the best Prosumer with regards to optical zoom has almost certainly got to be the 8 megapixel Samsung Pro815. It has an unprecedented X15 OPTICAL zoom.

Personally, however, I use a Fuji Finepix S5500 (10x) with a telephoto additon (1.5x) which combine to give me a similar performance, but with more glass. The Samsung is somewhat more expensive, though.

Last edited by FeiJi Fancier; 19-03-2006 at 4:58 PM.
FeiJi Fancier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 4:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bromley
Posts: 1,990
Thanks: Gave 32, Got 145
that doesnt in anyway make it the best ultra zoom camera
ush flynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 5:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 140
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 5
Well, as that's always going to be a subjective issue, my point is that both are worth considering.

There's no such thing as "best" anything - because a horse for one course maybe a donkey for another (of course, you may prefer a donkey - it's steady, and carries a heavy weight - although stubborn).

However, having read my reply, I take your point - I did say "best" - I take that back - I should have said that "worth considering is".
FeiJi Fancier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 7:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 324
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 8
either of the Panasonics, the FZ7 is alittle berter IMO, though not a huge cahnge, but the larger screen is nice,

heres alink to a thread i took some tests shots with.

Dont like the Sony..way too big.......Canon is way to expensive plus its just been replaced by the s3.

We wont be selling the new Sony H2 as jessops will have a specail Black version going for around 250.

But the Panny wins by a mile for me.

The "new" camera thread.... (Updated regularly)
cu3ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 8:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 966
Thanks: Gave 71, Got 59
am i right in thinking the samsung 815 has'ent got an image stabilizer,as having a 15x optical zoom i would have thought you would definately need one, unless you have an extremely steady hand or are going to carry a tripod around with you.
beachy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 9:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Pink Fairy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 119
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachy
am i right in thinking the samsung 815 has'ent got an image stabilizer,as having a 15x optical zoom i would have thought you would definately need one, unless you have an extremely steady hand or are going to carry a tripod around with you.
I.S. is worth a lot, but don't get zoom figures confused with actual reach... the Samsung doesn't get you any closer than most competitors, it's 420mm (35mm equiv.) at maximum, and that's par for the course for similar 'big zoom; cameras.
Pink Fairy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 10:30 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 572
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 34
The UltraZ's are quite fun. Below is one from my moon set, taken with FZ5, handheld.

http://static.flickr.com/29/97132921_9ee61f1da7.jpg

The I.S is excellent.

K.
kavster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2006, 11:16 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 324
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 8
You have to bear in mind that the Samsung starts at 28mm, unlike most of the others.

Yes the Samsung has what they call a Handshake Stability system in the lens.
cu3ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 5:24 PM   #10 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
petrolhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,325
Thanks: Gave 81, Got 34
I will be selling a Finepix S5500 ( still under warranty) very soon and also have the TCON17 Tele
__________________
better to go in a blaze of glory than to fade away
petrolhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 5:58 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
mutamist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hitchin
Posts: 544
Thanks: Gave 83, Got 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by kavster
The UltraZ's are quite fun. Below is one from my moon set, taken with FZ5, handheld.

http://static.flickr.com/29/97132921_9ee61f1da7.jpg

The I.S is excellent.

K.
That's an awesome photo - thanks for sharing.

Thanks for all the replies people - I think the FZ7 is the one Ill go for but I have a couple of weeks until i will be buying it so I can still be persuaded otherwise!
__________________
Wax On, Wax Off - Blog - - - - flickr - - - - Fable Photos
mutamist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 6:20 PM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 572
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by mutamist
That's an awesome photo - thanks for sharing.

Thanks for all the replies people - I think the FZ7 is the one Ill go for but I have a couple of weeks until i will be buying it so I can still be persuaded otherwise!
Cool

Pop on over to the DPreview forums, link to Panasonic forum below:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1033

There are a ton of photos with all the FZs in there, macros with the Oly MCONs, Nikon 4T/6T, and TCONs so you can see a wide variety of shots, also standard

The Sony and Canon forums on there are useful too.

Hope that helps,

K.
kavster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 7:47 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 140
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pink Fairy
I.S. is worth a lot, but don't get zoom figures confused with actual reach... the Samsung doesn't get you any closer than most competitors, it's 420mm (35mm equiv.) at maximum, and that's par for the course for similar 'big zoom; cameras.
Interesting, not being a photography expert (just an educated point and shooter really), I'd not really considered the thought that lens reach might be anything other than 15 times closer than no zoom at all.

Am I right in believing that what you're saying is that this camera (the Pro815) starts with a wider angle view than most, and therefore the lens may be more flexible than many, giving it good telephoto reach, but a noticeably better wide angle starting point with no zoom applied?
FeiJi Fancier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 8:19 PM   #14 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Coventry
Posts: 4,085
Thanks: Gave 107, Got 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by petrolhead
I will be selling a Finepix S5500 ( still under warranty) very soon and also have the TCON17 Tele
will the tele adaptor fit my s9(5)000?
__________________
Relysis 40 inch LCD, Harman Kardon AVR 630, MCPC (Silverstone case, IMON, Tosh HDDVD-ROM, E2200@2.5GHz, 4670 ultimate, 3GB, 80GB 2.5" drive, Sweetspot SDI card,Happauge HVR4000, Win 7 Enterprise), Kef XQ5/XQ2C/Q2DS/Q8S, Cyrus aca7.5, PSXR, CD6, Quad 303 x 3, Sky+ 250 SDI
SeanT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2006, 10:16 PM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Pink Fairy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 119
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeiJi Fancier
Interesting, not being a photography expert (just an educated point and shooter really), I'd not really considered the thought that lens reach might be anything other than 15 times closer than no zoom at all.

Am I right in believing that what you're saying is that this camera (the Pro815) starts with a wider angle view than most, and therefore the lens may be more flexible than many, giving it good telephoto reach, but a noticeably better wide angle starting point with no zoom applied?

Yep, the zoom figure 8x, 10x , 12x or whatever just describes the focal length coverage of the lens, not how much closer the subject will be in the final image compared to your standard view of it (by which i mean your naked eye or about 50mm focal length in 35mm film equivillant).

If you are buying a camera for it's telephoto capabilities, always look at the quoted 35mm equivillant figure for the lens, not the zoom figure like 10x.

15x is quite dramatic coverage, giving a good spread from genuine wide angle to good telephoto... but there's often an optical compromise with increased zoom coverage.
Pink Fairy is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
camera, panasonic, sony, ulktra, zoom
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting