 | | |
28-05-2005, 8:46 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Ex Member
Join Date: May 2003 Location: Manchester city
Posts: 2,784
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 | Christening gift?
This is a photo of our good friends little girl jessica, who we love to bits. Sweetest little girl we've ever known.
Diane's going to be her new baby brothers godmother in a couple of weeks and i thought one of these photos would make a good gift if i get a decent modern frame. Taken at full res so it'll be a decent size (original)
Get something for liam to of course.
Do you think any of them would make a good gift with a contemporary frame?
Last edited by seany; 29-05-2005 at 1:26 AM.
|
| |
28-05-2005, 9:45 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,019
Thanks: Gave 10, Got 27 |
The first two are better than the third in my opinion... a more contemporary style of photography for a more cotemporary frame....
|
| |
29-05-2005, 8:59 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 4,113
Thanks: Gave 289, Got 425 |
I prefer the first - number two has hair across the right eye which makes it appear in shadow, and the third is more of a snapshot, plus the top of the head has been cropped (although that's true of all three)
__________________ "All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt
"It's no good saying "hold it" to a moment in real life." - Lord Snowdon |
| |
29-05-2005, 9:07 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 803
Thanks: Gave 12, Got 26 |
Number 2 looks more natural, less posed (although the comment regarding the hair is true it does not spoil the picture); better exposure/contrast too. In No 1 her face is in shadow, No 3 is very much a snapshot style of picture. I think No 2 would look great in a frame....well done
Pete.
__________________ Which will come first, Alien invasion/supervolcano eruption/asteroid impact/WW3/bird flu? Global Warming is looking like the HOT favourite CaptureMe.zenfolio.com
Last edited by technofan; 29-05-2005 at 9:20 AM.
|
| |
29-05-2005, 9:46 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Bristol.
Posts: 4,843
Thanks: Gave 679, Got 340 |
Number one, in a nice crisp silver frame. One hell of a gift. Personal, individual and something money cannot buy...
Class mate.
Pete.
|
| |
29-05-2005, 10:27 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Woodford Essex
Posts: 522
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
I'd go with the second one. Hard to tell where the focus point is on this small version. If its on the eye behind the hair its a winner.
I understand the 'arty' appeal of b+w but it would not be my choice.
|
| |
29-05-2005, 10:59 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Barnsley
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: Gave 347, Got 558 |
No1, its a nice nice bright shot, the pose looks very natural and relaxed, think her parents would be well chuffed mate.
__________________ Si
AV Forums "Photo Competition" can be found HERE
Octobers's Photo Competition thumbnail Page HERE All opinions are mine! (unless I'm told otherwise) |
| |
29-05-2005, 11:19 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bristol
Posts: 528
Thanks: Gave 184, Got 105 |
I'd also go with the first one mate its a great shot. However you know her best so its worth going with the one you think its most like her - if that makes sense  What I'm trying to say is that although I prefer the first two pics, they are all good. So if you remember her most with pigtails and that cute little grin in the 3rd picture rather than with her head on her hands in the other two, then I'd go for that one.
You could always go for one of those modern frames that have space for 3 pics and use them all |
| |
29-05-2005, 11:24 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,040
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22 |
first one!
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..
Thanks
|
| |
29-05-2005, 11:42 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Ex Member
Join Date: May 2003 Location: Manchester city
Posts: 2,784
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
Cheers fellas 1's been my fav from the start. Just wanted some opinions and thanks for giving them
Right some advice now chaps about settings for printing. I'm going to take it to jessops do i have to change the DPI (original's 72 dpi) or anything or is that only for home printing, and how large should i go with a res of 3504 x2336
if i do need to change the DPI how do i do it, i don't use PS anywhere near like i should be doing
cheers lads
|
| |
29-05-2005, 12:55 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 803
Thanks: Gave 12, Got 26 |
Seany,
Can't help with your question but here's a thought for your consideration. I get my pictures done at http://www.photobox.co.uk/index.html
It's free and easy to use, good prices and great quality....just a thought
Pete.
PS....No 2
__________________ Which will come first, Alien invasion/supervolcano eruption/asteroid impact/WW3/bird flu? Global Warming is looking like the HOT favourite CaptureMe.zenfolio.com |
| |
29-05-2005, 12:59 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Ex Member
Join Date: May 2003 Location: Manchester city
Posts: 2,784
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
Cheers mate, i do have an account with them just that i'm off to town today so i was going to bang it in jessops to see if they could do it in an hr.
Just need to know if i should change the dpi or not, will it degrade the image ect if i increase it ect
Have no clue |
| |
29-05-2005, 1:21 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Morecambe, U.K.
Posts: 1,697
Thanks: Gave 8, Got 48 |
How about a nice locket for the picture no.1.
__________________ Panasonic px80 37" Plasma, Humax PVR, Sony s350 BluRay, Marantz 7300 AV receiver, Boston Micro centre and sats with Rel sub. Homepage: The virtual presence of GrahamC |
| |
29-05-2005, 2:04 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,040
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22 |
seany keep as high res as possible when taking the image, comercial printing tends to be at a higher dpi, i keep all my images at 300dpi, as that is what commercial printing generally is done at, newspapers are circa 150dpi i think
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..
Thanks
|
| |
29-05-2005, 4:06 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Ex Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 953
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
Alternative present, which I have done before, is to buy domain name of child in question (eg. www.jessicasurname.co.uk from www.1and1.co.uk) & then redirect to free slideshow hosting s/w & upload some of your shots for starters. Register in parents names & they can decide on use of site moving forward.
This means the parents can share photos with everyone who has a computer plus the child has a domain name of her own for when she is older.
Just a thought if you want to be different |
| | | |